Skip to main content

For a Personal Foundation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Is God the Best Explanation of Things?
  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter begins our inquiry into whether the foundation of existence is personal. Rasmussen seeks to uncover relevant clues. The bulk of the chapter is about four clues: (i) organized complexity, (ii) consciousness, (iii) morality, and (iv) reason. Rasmussen gives a Bayesian assessment of each of these and suggests why they independently point to a common root: intentional powers of a foundational mind. Rasmussen then adds a new, deductive argument for the same result. This argument is an extension of his argument from arbitrary limits. This deduction follows a path from (i) no arbitrary, unexplained limits, to (ii) a maximally powerful foundation, and then to (iii) a foundation with intentional powers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more on this subject, see, for example, Wagner’s Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle .

  2. 2.

    Lightman (2011), p. 3.

  3. 3.

    Collins (2003).

  4. 4.

    For reasons why the laws themselves are immaterial, see Jaworski (2016).

  5. 5.

    One argument against the very possibility of awareness from non-awareness comes from the indeterminacy problem, with material configurations being unable to determine which particular thing one is thinking. See Ross (2008), Chapter 6. See also a version of my counting argument for this same problem (Rasmussen 2018).

  6. 6.

    Thanks to Robin Collins and Ben Bavar for comments on previous drafts.

References

  • Collins, Robin. 2003. “God, Design, and Fine-Tuning.” In God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, edited by R. M. Bernard, 54–65. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, William. 2016. “Why Materialism Is False, and Why It Has Nothing to Do with the Mind.” Philosophy 91 (2): 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightman, Alan. 2011. “The Accidental Universe.” Harper’s. https://harpers.org/archive/2011/12/the-accidental-universe/.

  • Rasmussen, Joshua. 2018. “Against Non-reductive Physicalism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose, Angus J. L. Menuge, and J. P. Moreland, 328–339. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, James. 2008. Thought and World: The Hidden Necessities. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. 2014. Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rasmussen, J. (2019). For a Personal Foundation. In: Is God the Best Explanation of Things?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23752-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics