Skip to main content

Student Voice(s) on the Enactment of the Research-Teaching Nexus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter offers a students’-eye view of the relationship between teaching and research through a meta-analysis of enquiries undertaken by student researchers in nine disciplinary areas in which students interviewed academics about their perceptions of the research-teaching nexus. Analysis of these investigations reveals a range of views held by academics (even within the same department) about the value of linking teaching and research. The analysis also demonstrates the value of partnering ‘students-as-researchers’ rather than simply conducting ‘research on students’. As a consequence of considering students as partners here, we offer a modification to the idea that the scholarship of teaching should necessarily be student-centred, but rather that students and staff should share a discipline-centred gaze.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamsson, B.-E. (2013). Acquiring and sharing knowledge: Exploring the links between research and teaching in social science and public policy. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsson, B.-E., Cleary, S., Hall, R., Kwok, A. Y. H., Lynch, S., Varambhia, A., … Kinchin, I. M. (2012, June 19). Students as co-researchers of the curriculum. Paper presented at the 6th Excellence in Teaching Conference, King’s College London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2011). Separating the ‘teaching’ from the ‘academic’: Possible unintended consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C. B. (2012). Strategic curriculum change: Global trends in universities. London: Routledge and SRHE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29, 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J., & Maunder, R. (2014). Going URB@N: exploring the impact of undergraduate students as pedagogic researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(2), 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, S. (2013). Perceptions of collaboration in research and teaching in a School of Biomedical Sciences. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A., & Alter, Z. (2011). What is and what can be: How a liminal position can change learning and teaching in higher education. Anthropology and Education, Quarterly, 42(1), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, J. (2009). Learning in research-intensive environments: Do students benefit? LTEA Conference, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCarlo, S. E. (2009). The Claude Bernard distinguished lecture: Too much content, not enough thinking, and too little FUN! Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotterer, R. L. (2002). Student-faculty collaborations, undergraduate research, and collaboration as an administrative model. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 90, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, L., & Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://escalate.ac.uk/8242.

  • Feldman, A., Divoll, K. A., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Science Education, 97(2), 218–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education. London: UCL Press. Retrieved from http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=630699.

  • Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2013). Challenging frameworks for understanding teaching practices in higher education: The end or the beginning? Qualitative Research in Education, 2(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (2013). Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery: From university intention to student perception. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2013). Reframing teaching relationships: From student-centred to subject-centred learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(7), 773–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., Breen, R., & Lindsay, R. (2003). Reshaping teaching in higher education: Linking teaching with research. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaartinen-Koutaniemi, M., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Personal epistemology of psychology, theology and pharmacy students: A comparative study. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiko, C. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (Eds.). (2013). Student perspectives on research-rich teaching. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6 (Special Issue), 1–98. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244483439_student_perspectives_on_research-rich_teaching.

  • Kandiko, C. B., & Mawer, M. (2013). Student expectations and perceptions of higher education. Report for the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M. (2016). Visualising powerful knowledge to develop the expert student: A knowledge structures perspective on teaching and learning at university. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M., Hatzipanagos, S., & Turner, N. (2009). Epistemological separation of research and teaching among graduate teaching assistants. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2007). The myth of the research-led teacher. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 13(1), 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M., Kingsbury, M., & Buhmann, S. Y. (2018). Research as pedagogy in academic development. In E. Medland, R. Watermeyer, A. Hosein, I. M. Kinchin, & S. Lygo-Baker (Eds.), Pedagogical peculiarities: Conversations at the edge of university teaching and learning (pp. 49–67). Rotterdam: Brill and Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J., Bowe, J., Sprake, J. A., & Kinchin, I. M. (2011). In vivo laboratory practicals in research-led teaching: An example using glucose tolerance tests in lean and obese mice. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 64(2), 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, A. Y. H. (2013). Research-teaching links in the School of Arts and Humanities: An enquiry-based learning approach. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W. (2004). Integrating research and teaching strategies: Implications for institutional management and leadership in the United Kingdom. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. (2013). Research-teaching links at the Institute of Psychiatry. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, M. (2014). A critical evaluation of recent progress in understanding the role of the research-teaching link in higher education. Higher Education, 67(3), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2013). Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 24, 8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 19–32). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. W. (2013). Developing a new framework for conceptualizing “student-centered learning”. The Educational Forum, 77(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L., & Sandover, S. (2010). Beyond ‘listening’ to the student voice: The undergraduate researcher’s contribution to the enhancement of teaching and learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 7(2). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp.vol7/iss2/4.

  • Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., & Bond, C. H. (2001). Experiences of the relation between teaching and research: What do academics value? Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2012). Researching higher education (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2016). Examining the research/teaching nexus. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varambhia, A. (2013). Perception of research-teaching links in Natural and Mathematical Sciences. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburgh, A., Elen, J., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). Investigating the myth of the relationship between teaching and research in higher education: A review of the empirical research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(5), 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. (2013). An international comparison between the research-teaching links at two Schools of Law. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickenden, J. (2013). Investigating research-teaching links in the undergraduate School of Medicine: Ownership as a means of rebalancing student objectives. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worton, J. M. (2013). How do we learn? Disciplinary ways of thinking and their roles within the undergraduate curriculum at King’s College London Dental School. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led teaching and learning in higher education: A case. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardi, K., & Myatt, P. (2014). Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: A cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported in part through the King’s-Warwick Project funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian M. Kinchin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kinchin, I.M., Kandiko Howson, C.B. (2019). Student Voice(s) on the Enactment of the Research-Teaching Nexus. In: Lygo-Baker, S., Kinchin, I., Winstone, N. (eds) Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20823-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20824-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics