Skip to main content

Overcoming Knowledge Stickiness in International Business Simulation Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A business simulation game can make learning fun, but what makes it effective in fostering knowledge transfer to the actual work setting? A thematic analysis of qualitative responses from a diverse sample of former participants of an international strategy business simulation game uncovered meaningful pedagogical practices that enable classroom-workplace knowledge transfer of four critical higher-order cognitive skills, namely (1) the ability to articulate, (2) the ability to simplify information, (3) the ability to strategize, and (4) the ability to ‘think out of the box.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adobor, H., & Daneshfar, A. (2006). Management simulations: Determining their effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 25(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramenko, A. (2012). Enhancing students’ employability through business simulation. Education + Training, 54(5), 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, T., & Carton, T. C. (2008). From rhetoric to reality: Business games as educational tools. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 9(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, P., Philipse, R., & Ziefle, M. (2016). Projecting efficacy and use of business simulation games in the production domain using technology acceptance models. In C. Schlick & S. Trzcieliński (Eds.), Advances in ergonomics of manufacturing: Managing the enterprise of the future (pp. 607–620). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. (2003). Use of business simulation games in Hong Kong. Simulation & Gaming, 34(3), 358–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookall, D., & Thorngate, W. (2009). Acting, knowing, learning, simulating, gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 40(1), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, D., & Brown, F. W. (2000). Using a business simulation to teach applied skills: The benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 330–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fripp, J. (1997). A future for business simulations? Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(4), 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. S., & Korth, S. J. (1997). Classroom strategies that facilitate transfer of learning to the workplace. Innovative Higher Education, 22(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner, A., Quesada-Pallarés, C., & Knogler, M. (2014). Digital simulation-based training: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1097–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. (2016). Design and effectiveness of a self-study pedagogical approach to using a simulation game in the classroom. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 43(1), 136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, P., & Hodkinson, P. (2009). Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning. British Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., Lu, J., & Showanasai, P. (2010). Learning to lead organizational change: Assessment of a problem-based simulation in Thailand. Educational Review, 62(4), 467–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeton, M. T., & Tate, P. J. (1978). Learning by experience—What, why, how. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Newman, R. (2009). Evaluating business simulation software: Approach, tools and pedagogy. On the Horizon, 17(4), 368–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Talent Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacruz, A. J., & Américo, B. L. (2018). Debriefing’s influence on learning in business game: An experimental design. Brazilian Business Review, 15(2), 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mala, D. (2017, April 7). Thai students still lag the rest: The ability to learn, analyse and think critically is sadly lacking in Thailand. The Bangkok Post. Retrieved March 7, 2019, from https://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/news/1228212/thai-students-still-lag-the-rest

  • Martin, D., & McEvoy, B. (2003). Business simulations: A balanced approach to tourism education. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15(6), 336–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B. W., Dale, K. M., Fraccastoro, K. A., & Moss, G. (2011). Improving transfer of learning: Relationship to methods of using business simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 42(1), 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, R. J. (1991). Business computerized simulation: The Australian experience. Simulation & Gaming, 22(1), 36–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muramatsu, J., Krabuanrat, T., Pongpanich, C., & Fujioka, T. (2013). Exploring current status of the usage of business simulation games in Thai’s business school. 広島大学マネジメント研究, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselwhite, C. (2006). University executive education gets real. American Society of Training and Development, 60(5), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the National Education Commission (2003). Education in Thailand 2002/2003. Amarin Printing and Publishing. Retrieved March 10, 2019, from http://lms.bks.ac.th/lms/ebook/pdf/education03/pdf.pdf

  • Pongpanich, C., Krabuanrat, T., & Tan, K. H. (2009). Educator insight on simulations and games: A comparative study between business schools in Thailand and the UK. On the Horizon, 17(4), 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M., Burns, D., Lu, X., & Winsor, R. (2015). Knowledge and skills transfer between MBA and workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(3), 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogmans, T. (2016). Effective use of business simulation games in international business courses. AIB Insights, 16(2), 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdá, B.-C., & Alsina, Á. (2017). Knowledge-transfer and self-directed methodologies in university students’ learning. Reflective Practice, 19(5), 573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, G., & Cragin, J. (2015). Game on: Virtual reality in international business education. In V. Tara & M. Gonzalez-Perez (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of experiential learning in international business (pp. 401–417). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulation on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldy, T. G. (2009). Learning organization and transfer: Strategies for improving performance. The Learning Organization, 16(1), 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J., & Luethge, D. (2003). The impact of involvement on performance in business simulations: An examination of Goosen’s ‘know little’ decision-making thesis. Journal of Education for Business, 79(2), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016, November 10). Getting back on track: Reviving growth and securing prosperity for all. Thailand Systematic Country Diagnostic. Retrieved March 10, 2019, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/855161479736248522/pdf/110396-REVISED-v1-4-26-WB-TH-SCD-REPORT-BOOKLET-159PAGE-RevisedApr26.pdf

  • Zantow, K., Knowlton, D. S., & Sharp, D. C. (2005). More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(4), 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olimpia C. Racela .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thoumrungroje, A., Racela, O.C., Chintakananda, A. (2019). Overcoming Knowledge Stickiness in International Business Simulation Games. In: Gonzalez-Perez, M.A., Lynden, K., Taras, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Learning and Teaching International Business and Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20415-0_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics