Skip to main content

Ethnicity and Other Demographics Associated with Perceived Police Fairness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policing and Minority Communities
  • 66k Accesses

Abstract

Past research suggests that ethnicity influences perceptions of the fairness and legality of police action. However, most studies focused on Black and White individuals with less attention to Hispanics, most studies did not control for other demographics, and most studies gave no consideration for differences according to region of the United States. The present study examines how perceptions of police fairness in home and vehicle searches differ according to ethnicity (Black, White, Hispanic), while controlling for other demographics (gender, age, income, prior legal experience), with separate analyses for individuals from the Southwest (Texas) and the Northwest (Pennsylvania). Participants included 334 Texas university students and 643 Pennsylvania university students who completed anonymous surveys to provide demographics and to rate how “reasonable and therefore legal” were eight home search cases and seven vehicle search cases reviewed by the Supreme Court. T-tests revealed that the two regions were similar in perceived police fairness for home searches, but Texas individuals perceived more police fairness in vehicle searches. ANCOVAs conducted separately by region revealed that White individuals perceived more police fairness in both home and vehicle searches than did Black or Hispanic individuals, but only in Pennsylvania. Additionally, more police fairness was reported by individuals who were older (in Pennsylvania), with more income (in Pennsylvania), and with more prior legal experience (in Texas). Present results suggest that ethnicity may not be the primary demographic associated with perceptions of police fairness, with learned personal and regional experiences just as important as predictors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alpert, G. P., MacDonald, J., & Dunham, R. G. (2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology, 43(2), 407–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, D., & Mendelsohn, H. (1969). Minorities and the police: Confrontation in America. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1958). Ethnicity prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V. K. (2011). Racial disparity in police stop and searches in England and Whales. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckler, K., Unnever, J. D., & Cohen, F. T. (2008). Perceptions of injustice revisited: A test of Hagan et al.’s comparative conflict theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 31(1), 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, L., & Garcia, V. (2005). Ethnicity and satisfaction with the police in a small city. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durán, R. J. (2009). Legitimated oppression: Inner-city Mexican American experiences with police gang enforcement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607313057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S. (2008). A critique of the outcome test in racial profiling research. Justice Quarterly, 25(136), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S., & Calnon, J. M. (2004). Comparing benchmark technologies for policecitizen contacts: Traffic stop data collection for the Pennsylvania state police. Police Quarterly, 7, 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S., & Johnson, R. (2006). Toward a better understanding of racial and ethnic disparities in search and seizure rates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 605–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, T. W. (2010). The intersection of defendants’ ethnicity, gender, and age in prosecutorial decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Payne, M. R., & Shedd, C. (2005). Ethnicity, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S., Perry, H., & Vile, M. (2004). Black cities, white cities: Evaluating the police. Political Behavior, 26, 4568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, K. (2016). Border checkpoints and substantive due process: Abortion rights in the border zone. Yale Law Journal, 125(6), 1744–1756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, Y., Frank, J., & Browning, S. (2000). The attitudes of juveniles toward the police. Policing, 23, 3753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. L., & Jacobs, D. (2005). Minority threat and police strength from 1980 to 2000: A fixedeffects analysis of nonlinear and interactive effects in large cities. Criminology, 43(3), 731–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. K. (2009). Free to leave? An empirical look at the fourth Amendment’s seizure standard. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(1), 51–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahm, C. F., Papp, J., & Rubino, L. (2016). Police shootings in black and white: Exploring newspaper coverage of officer-involved shootings. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 21, 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mast, M. S. (2004). Men are hierarchal, women are egalitarian: An implicit gender stereotype. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murty, K., Roebuck, J., & Smith, J. (1990). The image of the police in black Atlanta communities. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Will more black cops matter? Officer race and police-involved homicides of black citizens. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017). A bird’s eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, N. L. (2012). The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Investigating the relationship between fear of falling and white collar crime. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 362–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task force report: The police. Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojek, J., Rosenfeld, R., & Decker, S. (2012). Policing ethnicity: The racial stratification of searches in police traffic stops. Criminology, 50(4), 993–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments (p. 1567). Beverly Hills: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, M. S., Correll, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2012). The world is not black and white: Racial bias in the decision to shoot in a multiethnic context. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01749.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, A. M., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2005). Global and neighborhood attitudes toward the police: Differentiation by ethnicity and type of contact. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 391–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. W., & Holmes, M. (2003). Community accountability, minority threat, and police brutality: An examination of civil rights criminal complaints. Criminology, 41(4), 1035–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Ethnicity, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40(2), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., Tuch, S. A., & Skogan, W. A. (2008). Police-community relations in a majority black city. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 398–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6.1 Descriptive statistics of study variables for participants from Texas (N = 334) and Pennsylvania (N = 643)
Table 6.2 Results of 3 × 2 ANCOVAs to examine demographic variables associated with perceived police fairness in home searches, shown separately for Texas students (N = 334) and Pennsylvania students (N = 643)
Table 6.3 Results of 3 × 2 ANCOVAs to examine demographic variables associated with perceived police fairness in vehicle searches, shown separately for Texas students (N = 334) and Pennsylvania students (N = 643)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Can, S.H. (2019). Ethnicity and Other Demographics Associated with Perceived Police Fairness. In: Albrecht, J.F., den Heyer, G., Stanislas, P. (eds) Policing and Minority Communities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19181-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19182-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics