Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

Abstract

Some healthcare education and patient safety professionals view their interactions with industry representatives as merely transactional, that the only purpose of corporations is simply to design, advertise, and sell goods. This simplified view can lead to the simulation industry being dismissed as a necessary evil, a source of loaned or promotional products, or a source of income to institutions and special interest groups. However, the role of commercial enterprise is much more expansive than this in practice, as the majority of companies and their representatives are true stakeholders who wish to promote best practices in education and safe patient care. Despite the often altruistic and complementary nature of the work performed by corporations that focus on simulation products and services, a healthcare simulation technology specialist may not understand the value and role of industry in this field. This creates the potential for misunderstandings between the stakeholders and can lead to unmet expectations, as even the best customer and supplier relationships can become strained at times. This chapter outlines the role and goal of industry in the education and patient safety environment, benefits for developing relationships with industry stakeholders, and an understanding of the sometimes unseen services that they provide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AACOM:

American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

AAMC:

Association of American Medical Colleges

AMA:

American Medical Association

AOA:

American Osteopathic Association

CEO:

Chief Executive Officer

CFO:

Chief Financial Officer

CIO:

Chief Information Officer

CMO:

Chief Medical Officer

CMS:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

COO:

Chief Operating Officer

CRADA:

Combined Research and Development Agreement

CTO:

Chief Technology Officer

FAQs:

Frequently Asked Questions

HSTS:

Healthcare Simulation Technology Specialist

IoM:

Institute of Medicine

PPSA:

Physician Payments Sunshine Act (2010)

RFP:

Request for Proposal

RFQ:

Request for Quote

SBARA:

Situation, Background, Assessment, and Required Assistance

SIGs:

Special Interest Groups

SVP:

Senior Vice President

TT:

Technology Transfer

VP:

Vice President

References

  1. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Standards for commercial support. [Online] http://www.accme.org/accreditation-rules/standards-for-commercial-support. Available from: http://www.accme.org/accreditation-rules/standards-for-commercial-support

  2. Council on Osteopathic Continuing Medical Education. Accreditation requirements for category 1 CME sponsors. [Online] https://osteopathic.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/cme-accreditation-requirements.pdf. American Osteopathic Association; 2018.

  3. American Medical Association. AMA conflict of interest policy. [Online] https://www.ama-assn.org/ama-conflict-interest-policy; 1999.

  4. American Nurses Association. Conflict of interest policy. [Online] https://www.nursingworld.org/~497a1a/globalassets/ana/leadership%2D%2Dgovernance/conflict-of-interest-policy-and-financial-disclosure-form-2018.pdf; 2017.

  5. American Nurses Credentialling Center. Volunteers’ Conflict of Interest Disclosure. [Online] https://www.nursingworld.org/~4a18b2/globalassets/certification/ancc-vol-opportunities/ancc-volunteer-conflict-of-interest-and-financial-disclosure.pdf; 2012.

  6. Association of American Medical Colleges. Conflicts of Interest and Transparency Initiatives. [Online] https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/research/coi/; 2018. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/research/coi/

  7. Association of American medical Society Executives. AAMSE conflict of interest policy and procedure. [Online] https://www.aamse.org/page/conflict_of_interest. Available from: https://www.aamse.org/page/conflict_of_interest

  8. Council of Medical Specialty Societies. Code for interactions & code signers. [Online] https://www.aamse.org/page/conflict_of_interest. Available from: https://www.aamse.org/page/conflict_of_interest

  9. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Partnership compact. [Online] http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Memberships/Patient-Safety-Coalition/Pages/background.aspx. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Memberships/Patient-Safety-Coalition/Pages/background.aspx

  10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Conflict of interest disclosures. [Online] https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/conflict-of-interest-disclosures; 2018. Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/conflict-of-interest-disclosures

  11. Fineberg HV. Conflict of interest: why does it matter? JAMA. 2017;317(17):1717–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colleges AoAM. Industry funding of medical education: report of an AAMC task force. [Online] https://www.aamc.org/download/482220/data/industryfundingofmedicaleducation.pdf. AAMC, Washington, DC; 2008.

  13. Lichter A, McKinney R, Anderson T, Breese E, Brennan N, Butler D, et al. Harmonizing reporting on potential conflicts of interest: a common disclosure process for health care and life sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2012. https://nam.edu/perspectives-2012-harmonizing-reporting-on-potential-conflicts-of-interest-a-common-disclosureprocess-for-health-care-and-life-sciences/

  14. Pew Charitable Trusts. Conflicts-of-interest policies for academic medical centers: recommendations for best practices. [Online] https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/0001/01/01/conflictsofinterest-policies-for-academic-medical-centers; 18 Dec 2013.

  15. Convey.org. Convey global disclosure system. [Online] http://www.convey.org/. Available from: http://www.convey.org/

  16. Transparency and Program Integrity – transparency reports and reporting of physician ownership or investment interests. S 301. Sect. 6002; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pizzo PA, Lawley TJ, Rubenstein AHJJ. Role of leaders in fostering meaningful collaborations between academic medical centers and industry while also managing individual and institutional conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1729–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams R. What is a sales funnel? The guide to building an automated selling machine. [Online] https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/296526. Entrepreneur.com. 2017. Available from: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/296526

  19. Miller Heiman Group. Professional selling skills. [Online] https://www.millerheimangroup.com/uk/training/foundational-selling/professional-selling-skills/. Available from: https://www.millerheimangroup.com/uk/training/foundational-selling/professional-selling-skills/.

  20. Walker G. IT problem management (Harris Kern’s enterprise computing institute series). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32(3):167–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Additional Recommended Readings

  • Doyle T, Carovano RG, Anton J. Successful simulation center operations: an industry perspective. In: Kyle RR, Murray WB, editors. Clinical simulation: operations, engineering and management. Boston: Elsevier; 2008. p. 479–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LaCombe DM, Whiteside GA. Working with vendors. In: Palaganas JC, Maxworthy JC, Epps CA, Mancini ME, editors. Defining excellence in simulation programs. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. p. 343–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowksi W. Success with clinical simulation = assessment + planning + implementation. In: Kyle RR, Murray WB, editors. Clinical simulation: operations, engineering and management. Boston: Elsevier; 2008. p. 471–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham A. Whiteside .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whiteside, G.A. (2019). Role and Goal of Industry in Education and Patient Safety. In: Crawford, S., Baily, L., Monks, S. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Operations, Technology, and Innovative Practice. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15378-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15378-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15377-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15378-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics