Abstract
Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are considered as the emerging components for Industry 4.0, the state-of-the art and standard CPS architecture playing the major role in understanding the nature of the industrial landscape. The key problem with traditional CPS architectures is that they are not up-to-mark and convincing to fulfil the needs of smart industries, as they merely consider vertical and horizontal integration with three components (i.e., human, cyber and physical components) integration. Currently, CPS lack adopting and highlighting the key interfacing elements which are vital for Industry 4.0. So, to remedy these problems and bridge the gap between concepts and implementing, this paper proposes to enhance the 3C CPS architecture based on the traditional 3C one for Industry 4.0 by adopting the main interfacing elements such as connectors, protocols, and sub-elements, for example human, cyber and physical parts. Hence, it can be said that the proposed enhanced 3C CPS architecture plays a significant role and will be considered as a guideline and application for future smart manufacturing CPS systems and industries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sadiku, M.N., Wang, Y., Cui, S., Musa, S.M.: Cyber-physical systems: a literature review. Eur. Sci. J. 13(36), 1–7 (2017)
Lu, Y.: Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 6, 1–10 (2017)
Bagheri, B., Yang, S., Kao, H.A., Lee, J.: Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3), 1622–1627 (2015)
Jiang, J.R.: An improved cyber–physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0 smart factories. In: 2017 International Conference on ICASI, pp. 918–920. IEEE (2017)
Pirvu, B.C., Zamfirescu, C.B., Gorecky, D.: Engineering insights from an anthropocentric cyber–physical system: a case study for an assembly station. Mechatronics 34, 147–159 (2016)
Thramboulidis, K.: A cyber–physical system-based approach for industrial automation systems. Comput. Ind. 72, 92–102 (2015)
Sodhro, A.H.: Convergence of IoT and Product Lifecycle Management in Medical Health Care, Future Generation Computer Systems: Special Issue on Emerging Edge-of-Things Computing: Opportunities and Challenges. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2018)
Hummel, V., Hyra, K., Ranz, F., Schuhmacher, J.: Competence development for the holistic design of collaborative work systems in the Logistics Learning Factory. Procedia CIRP 32, 76–81 (2015)
Sodhro, A.H., Kumar, A., Sodhro, G.H.: 5G-based transmission power control mechanism in fog computing for IoT devices. MDPI Sustain. 10(4), 1–17 (2018)
Holtewert, P., Wutzke, R., Seidelmann, J., Bauernhansl, T.: Virtual fort knox federative, secure and cloud-based platform for manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 7, 527–532 (2013)
Fang, C., Liu, X., Pardalos, P.M., Pei, J.: Optimization for a three-stage production system in the Internet of Things: procurement, production and product recovery, and acquisition. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 83(5–8), 689–710 (2016)
Gradišar, D., Glavan, M., Strmčnik, S., Mušič, G.: ProOpter: An advanced platform for production analysis and optimization. Comput. Ind. 70, 102–115 (2015)
Spöcker, G., Schreiner, T., Huwer, T., Arntz, K.: Programming of adaptive repair process chains using repair features and function blocks. J. Comput. Des. 3, 53–62 (2016)
Cheng, L., Wang, T., Hong, X., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Liu, J.: A study on the architecture of manufacturing internet of things. Int. J. Model. 23(1), 8–23 (2015)
Sodhro, A.H., Sekahri, A., Ouzrout, Y.: Energy-efficiency comparison between data rate control and transmission power control algorithms for wireless body sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. (IJDSN) 14(1), 1–18 (2018)
Toro, C., Barandiaran, I., Posada, J.: A perspective on knowledge based and intelligent systems implementation in Industry 4.0. Procedia Comput. Sci. 60, 362–370 (2015)
Berger, C., Hees, A., Braunreuther, S., Reinhart, G.: Characterization of cyber–physical sensor systems. Procedia CIRP 41, 638–643 (2016)
Lesjak, C., Ruprechter, T., Haid, J., Bock, H., Brenner, E.: A secure hardware module and system concept for local and remote industrial embedded system identification. In: Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2014)
Wan, J., et al.: Software-defined industrial internet of things in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Sens. J. 16(20), 7373–7380 (2016)
Sodhro, A.H., Li, Y.: Medical quality-of-service optimization in wireless telemedicine system using optimal smoothing algorithm. E-Health Telecommun. Syst. Netw. (ETSN) J. 2(1), 1 (2013)
Sodhro, A.H., Fortino, G.: Energy management during video transmission in WBSNs. In: 14th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Calabria, Italy, May 16–18 (2017)
Kashevnik, A., Teslya, N., Padun, B., Kipriyanov, K., Arckhipov, V.: Industrial cyber–physical system for lenses assembly: configuration workstation scenario. In: 2015 17th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), pp. 62–67 (2015)
Spath, D., Gerlach, S., Hämmerle, M., Schlund, S., Strölin, T.: Cyber–physical system for self-organised and flexible labour utilisation. Personnel 50, 22 (2013)
Grangel-González, I., Halilaj, L., Coskun, G., Auer, S., Collarana, D., Hoffmeister, M.: Towards a semantic administrative shell for industry 4.0 components. In: 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 230–237 (2016)
Gölzer, P., Cato, P., Amberg, M.: Data processing requirements of Industry 4.0-use cases for big data applications. ECIS 2015 research-in-progress papers. Paper 61, ISBN: 978-3-00-050284-2. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2015_rip/61 (2015)
Niggemann, O., Henning, S., Schriegel, S., Otto, J., Anis, A.: Models for adaptable automation software: an overview of plug-and-produce in industrial automation. In: 11th MBEES Workshop, pp. 73–82 (2015)
Schmitt, M., Orfgen, M., Zühlke, D.: Dynamic reconfiguration of intelligent field devices by using modular software applications. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3), 561–566 (2015)
Rosenberg, E., Haeusler, M. H., Araullo, R., Gardner, N.: Smart architecture-bots and Industry 4.0 principles for architecture. Fabrication Robots, vol. 2. eCAADe 33. http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/ecaade2015_155.content.pdf (2015)
Colombo, A.W., Karnouskos, S., Kaynak, O., Shi, Y., Yin, S.: Industrial cyberphysical systems. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 11(1), 6–16 (2017)
Urbina, M., Astarloa, A., Lázaro, J., Bidarte, U., Villalta, I., Rodriguez, M.: Cyber–physical production system gateway based on a programmable SoC platform. IEEE 5, 20408–20417 (2017)
Knezic, M., Dokic, B., Ivanovic, Z.: Theoretical and experimental evaluation of ethernet powerlink PollResponse chaining mechanism. IEEE Trans. 13, 923–933 (2017)
Ahmadi, A., Cherifi, C., Cheutet, V., Ouzrout, Y.: A review of CPS 5 components architecture for manufacturing based on standards. In: SKIMA, International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Intelligent Management and Applications, Colombo, Sri-Lanka (2017)
Acknowledgment
This research work has been supported by the SmartLink Project, Erasmus Mundus Program. The authors would like to thank SmartLink Project and Université Lumière Lyon2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ahmadi, A., Sodhro, A.H., Cherifi, C., Cheutet, V., Ouzrout, Y. (2019). Evolution of 3C Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0. In: Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., Cavalieri, S. (eds) Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing. SOHOMA 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 803. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03003-2_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03003-2_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03002-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03003-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)