Abstract
Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is one of the main technologies for the next generation wireless networking because of the positive impact it poses over other wireless networks having undergone rapid progress, which has inspired many applications. However, providing quality of service (QoS) assurance to MANET is hard because of the unpredictable nature of the wireless medium, contention problem amongst the channel, mobility problem and lack of central co-ordinator. Admission control is therefore seen as one of the methods for providing QoS. Admission control aim at estimating the network resource states and decides whether to admit a session without assuring more resources bandwidth space than what is available to avoid the violation of any rules that has been previously made. Some recent solution considered the MAC layer back-off impact due to collision as well as the non-synchronization between the sender and receiver when estimating the available bandwidth. None of the previous work proposed a technique that sends a HELLO packet to its one-hop neighbours which further aggregates to the rest of the nodes to retrieve the available bandwidth on a carrier sensing region, in order to limit the impact of additional overhead of the carrier sensing multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA). Also, none of the existing solution has properly addressed the channel idle time dependency between the sending node and the receiving node by differentiating the BUSY state from the SENSE BUSY states and the IDLE state caused by an empty queue. This paper, therefore reviews the bandwidth estimation techniques for admission control for MANET. The bandwidth estimation techniques for admission control have been categorized into two: active and passive estimation. An outline of each technique has been discussed as well as the proposed conceptual framework. The contribution as identified in this research work is the proposal of conceptual framework that adapts the following into the bandwidth estimation for admission control in MANET: (1) HELLO packet advertisement to one hop which further aggregates to retrieve the available bandwidth on the carrier sensing region, (2) Considering the channel idle time measurement by differentiating the channel busy state from channel sensing state and regarding an empty queue as an idle state. Future research directions are also outlined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hanzo, L., Tafazolli, R.: Admission control schemes for 802.11-based multi-hop mobile ad hoc networks: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 11(4), 78–108 (2009)
Chaudhari, S., Biradar, R.C.: Available bandwidth estimation using collision probability, idle period synchronization and waiting time. Wirel. Pers. Commun. Int. J. 83, 597–621 (2015)
Lal, C., Laxmi, V., Gaur, M.: Bandwidth-aware routing and admission control for efficient video streaming over MANETs. 21, 95–114 (2015)
Kaur, P., Singh, R.: A systematic approach for congestion control in wireless ad hoc network using Opnet. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 67(22), 1–8 (2013)
Khoukhi, L., Badis, H., Merghem-Boulahia, L., Esseghir, M.: Admission Control in Wireless ad hoc networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. (2013)
Arsan, T.: Review of bandwidth estimation tools and application to bandwidth adaptive video streaming. In: 9th International Conference on High Capacity Optical Networks and Enabling Technologies, pp. 152–156 (2012)
Li, M., Wu, Y.-L., Chang, C.-R.: Available bandwidth estimation for the network paths with multiple tight links and bursty traffic. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 36(1), 353–367 (2013)
Park, H. J., Roh, B.-H.: Accurate passive bandwidth estimation (APBE) in IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications, pp. 1–4 (2010)
Tursunova, S., Inoyatov, K., Kim, Y.-T.: Cognitive passive estimation of available bandwidth (cPEAB) in overlapped IEEE 802.11 WiFi WLANs. In: IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, pp. 448–454 (2010)
Hei, X., Bensaou, B., Tsang, D.H.K.: Model-based end-to-end available bandwidth inference using queueing analysis. Comput. Netw. 50(12), 1916–1937 (2006)
Barzuza, T., Ben Zedeff, S., Modai, O., Vainbrand, L., Wiener, Y., Yellin, E.: TREND: a dynamic bandwidth estimation and adaptation algorithm for real-time video calling. In: 18th International Packet Video Workshop, pp. 126–133 (2010)
Ali, R., Zafar, F.: Bandwidth estimation in mobile ad-hoc network (MANET). Int. J. Comput. Sci. 8(5), 331–337 (2011)
Wang, H., Lee, K., Li, E.: Timing is Everything: Accurate, Minimum Overhead. Available Bandwidth Estimation in High-speed Wired Networks, pp. 407–420 (2014)
Croce, D., Leonardi, E.: Large-scale available bandwidth measurements. Interference in current techniques. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 8(4), 361–374 (2011)
Xiao, Y., Chen, S., Li, X., Li, Y.: A new available bandwidth measurement method based on self-loading periodic streams. In: International Conference on IEEE Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCom 2007, 21–25 September 2007, pp. 1904–1907 (2007)
Ibrahim, M. F., Taib, M.N.: The deployment of end-to-end available bandwidth estimation mechanism in web-based application. In: IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 201–206 (2010)
Yuan, Z., Venkataraman, H., Muntean, G.M.: iBE: a novel bandwidth estimation algorithm for multimedia services over IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Management of Multimedia and Mobile Networks and Services: Wired–Wireless Multimedia Networks and Services Management, vol. 5842, pp. 69–80 (2009)
Prasad, R.S., Murray, M., Dovrolis, C., Claffy, K.C.: Bandwidth estimation: metrics. IEEE Netw. Meas. Tech Tools 17(6), 27–35 (2003)
Delphinanto, A., Koonen, T., Zhang, S., den Hartog, F.: Path capacity estimation in heterogeneous, best-effort, small-scale IP networks. In: IEEE 35th Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 1076–1083 (2010)
Pasztor, A., Veitch, D.: Active probing using packet quartets. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, pp. 293–305 (2002)
Downey, A.B.: Clink: A tool for estimating internet link characteristics (1999). http://rocky.wellesley.edu/downey/clink/
Downey, A.B.: Using pathchar to estimate internet link characteristics. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 241–250. ACM (1999)
Lai, K., Baker, M.: Measuring link bandwidths using a deterministic model of packet delay. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp. 283–294 (2000)
Mah, B.A.: Pchar: A tool for measuring internet path characteristics (2001). http://www.employees.org/bmah/Software/pchar/
Turrubiartes, M., Torres, D., Angulo, M., Munoz, D.: Analysis of IP network path capacity estimation using a variable packet size method. In: 15th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers, pp. 177–182 (2005)
Guerrero, C.D., Labrador, M.A.: Traceband: a fast, low overhead and accurate tool for available bandwidth estimation and monitoring. Comput. Netw. 54(6), 977–990 (2010)
Obara, H., Koseki, S., Selin, P.: Packet train pair: a fast and efficient technique for measuring available bandwidth in the internet. In: SICE Annual Conference, pp. 1833–1836 (2012)
Selin, P., Hasegawa, K., Obara, H.: Available bandwidth measurement technique using impulsive packet probing for monitoring end-to-end service quality on the internet. In: 17th Asia- Pacific Conference on Communications, pp. 518–523 (2011)
Hu, Z., Zhang, D., Zhu, A., Chen, Z., Zhou, H.: SLDRT: a measurement technique for available bandwidth on multi-hop path with bursty cross traffic. Comput. Netw. 56(14), 3247–3260 (2012)
Thouin, F., Coates, M., Rabbat, M.: Large scale probabilistic available bandwidth estimation. Comput. Netw. 55(9), 2065–2078 (2011)
Li, M., Chang, C.-R.: A two-way available bandwidth estimation scheme for multimedia streaming networks adopting scalable video coding. In: IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, pp. 1–6 (2009)
Lao, L., Dovrolis, C., Sanadidi, M.Y.: The probe gap model can underestimate the available bandwidth of multihop paths. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 36(5), 29–34 (2006)
Paul, A., Tachibana, A., Hasegawa, T.: An enhanced available bandwidth estimation technique for an end-to-end network path. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 13(4), 768–781 (2016)
Paul, A., Tachibana, A., Hasegawa, T.: Implementation Design of Available Bandwidth Measurement Scheme: A Proxy based Approach, pp. 257–262. ACM (2016)
Li, M., Claypool, M., Kinicki, R.: WBest: a bandwidth estimation tool for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, Montreal, Canada, pp. 374–381 (2008)
Yang, T., Jin, Y., Chen, Y., Jin, Y.: RT-WABest: a novel end-to-end bandwidth estimation tool in IEEE 802.11 wireless network. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 13(2) (2017)
Hu, N., Steenkiste, P.: Estimating available bandwidth using packet pair probing (No. CMUCS- 02-166). School of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2002)
Hu, N., Steenkiste, P.: Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 21(6), 879–894 (2003)
Tunali, T., Anar, K.: Adaptive available bandwidth estimation for internet video streaming. Signal Process. Image Commun. 21(3), 217–234 (2006)
Sedighizad, M., Seyfe, B., Navaie, K.: MR-BART: multi-rate available bandwidth estimation in real-time. J. Netw.Comput. Appl. 35(2), 731–742 (2012)
Nam, S.Y., Kim, S., Park, W.: Analysis of minimal backlogging-based available bandwidth estimation mechanism. J. Comput. Commun. 35(4), 431–443 (2012)
Calafate, C.T., Manzoni, P., Malumbres, M.P.: Supporting soft real-time services in MANETs using distributed admission control and IEEE 802.11e technology. In: 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, pp. 217–222 (2005)
Hoang, V. D., Shao, Z., Fujise, M.: A new solution to estimate the available bandwidth in MANETs. In: IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 2, pp. 653–657 (2006)
Ekelin, S., Nilsson, M., Hartikainen, E., Johnsson, A., Mngs, J.-E., Melander, B., et al.: Realtime measurement of end-to-end available bandwidth using Kalman filtering. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (2006)
Bergfeldt, E., Ekelin, S., Karlsson, J.M.: Real-time available-bandwidth estimation using filtering and change detection. Comput. Netw. 53(15), 2617–2645 (2009)
Lin, H., Liu, M., Zhou, A., Liu, H., Li, Z.C.: A novel hybrid probing technique for end-to-end available bandwidth estimation. In: IEEE 35th Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 400–407 (2010)
Farooq, M., Kunz, T.: Proactive bandwidth estimation for IEEE 802.15.4-based networks. In: Proceedings of the 77th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2013), pp. 1–5 (2013)
Gupta, D., Wu, D., Mohapatra, P., Chuah, C.-N.: Experimental comparison of bandwidth estimation tools for wireless mesh networks. In: IEEE Proceedings of INFOCOM, pp. 2891–2895, October 2009
Zhao, H., Garcia-Palacios, E., Wei, J., Xi, Y.: Accurate available bandwidth estimation in IEEE 802.11-based ad hoc networks. Comput. Commun. 32(6), 1050–1057 (2009)
Nam, S.Y., Kim, S.J., Lee, S., Kim, H.S.: Estimation of the available bandwidth ratio of a remote link or path segments. Comput. Netw. 57(1), 61–77 (2013)
Brakmo, L.S., Peterson, L.L.: TCP Vegas: End-to-end congestion avoidance on a global internet. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13(8), 1465–1480 (1995)
Casetti, C., Gerla, M., Mascolo, S., Sanadidi, M.Y., Wang, R.: TCP Westwood: congestion control with faster recovery. J. Wirel. Netw. 8(5), 467–479 (2002)
Sarr, C., Chaudet, C., et al.: Bandwidth estimation for IEEE 802.11-based ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 7(10), 1228–1241 (2008)
Yan, Z., Dapeng, W., Bin, W., Muqing, W., Chunxiu, X.: A novel call admission control routing mechanism for 802.11e based multi-hop MANET. In: 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, pp. 1–4 (2008)
Peng, Y., Yan, Z.: Available bandwidth estimating method in IEEE802.11e based mobile ad hoc network. In: 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 2138–2142 (2012)
de Renesse, R., Ghassemian, M., Friderikos, V., Aghvami, A.H.: QoS enabled routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Fifth IEEE International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies, pp. 678–682 (2004)
Yang, Y., Kravets, R.: Contention aware admission control for ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 4(4), 363–377 (2005)
de Renesse, R., Ghassemian, M., Friderikos, V., Aghvami, A.H.: Adaptive admission control for ad hoc and sensor networks providing quality of service. Technical report, King College, London (2005)
Lei, L., Zhang, T., Zhou, L., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Luo, C.: Estimating the available medium access bandwidth of IEEE 802.11 ad-hoc networks with concurrent transmission. IEEE Trans.veh. Technol. 64(2), 689–701 (2015)
Farooq, M., Kunz, T.: BandEst: measurement-based available bandwidth estimation and flow admission control algorithm for IEEE 802.15.4-based wireless multimedia networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015 (2015)
Adarbah, H.Y., Linfoot, S., Arafeh, B., Duffy, A.: Effect of physical and virtual carrier sensing on the AODV routing protocol in noisy MANETs. In: IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp. 508–509 (2013)
Vaidya, N.: On physical carrier sensing in wireless ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, pp. 2525–2535 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aina, F., Yousef, S., Osanaiye, O. (2019). Bandwidth Estimation for Admission Control in MANET: Review and Conceptual MANET Admission Control Framework. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R., Kapoor, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2018. FTC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 881. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02683-7_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02683-7_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02682-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02683-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)