Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Mediation Effect of Psychological Safety on the Relationship Between Interactional Injustice and Innovative Work Behavior

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being

  • 543 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to uncover the role of psychological safety on the relationship between interactional injustice and innovative work behavior. Psychological safety as one of the indicators of psychological well-being can yield positive individual- and organizational-level outcomes. Although a number of studies focused on the antecedents of innovative work behavior, studies that address innovative work behavior through an integrative approach remain scarce. The results of this study show that the interactional injustice perceptions of employees hinder their innovative behavior by diminishing their psychological safety. Thus, this current study denotes the detrimental role of interactional injustice in the psychological safety and discretionary behaviors of individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams JS (1963) Towards an understanding of inequity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67(5):422–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 267–299

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal UA (2014) Linking justice, trust and innovative work behavior to work engagement. Person Rev 43(1):41–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal UA, Bhargava S (2014) The role of social exchange on work outcomes: a study of Indian managers. Int J Human Resour Man 25(10):1484–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz ND (1989) The creative environment scales: work environment inventory. Creat Res J 2(4):231–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J 39(5):1154–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C (1982) The executive mind and double-loop learning. Organ Dyn 11(2):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee S, Budhwar PS, Chen ZX (2002) Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model. Int J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav 23(3):267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Avey JB, Wernsing TS, Luthans F (2008) Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. J Appl Behav Sci 44(1):48–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Walumbwa FO, Luthans F, May DR (2004) Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadersh Q 15(6):801–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav 24(1):45–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi A, Kumar K, Rani E (2009) Organizational justice perceptions as predictor of job satisfaction and organization commitment. Int J Bus Manag 4(9):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsade SG, Gibson DE (2007) Why does affect matter in organizations? Acad Manag Perspect 21(1):36–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsky A, Kaplan SA (2007) If you feel bad, it’s unfair: a quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions. J Appl Psychol 92(1):286–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ (2005) Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In: Greenberg J, Colquitt JA (eds) Handbook of organizational justice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, pp 85–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ (2015) Interactional justice: looking backward and looking forward. In: Oxford handbook of justice in work organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ, Moag JS (1986) Interactional communication criteria of fairness. J Organ Behav 9:289–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies RJ, Shapiro DL (1987) Interactional fairness judgments: the influence of causal accounts. Soc Justice Res 1(2):199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JW, Scott KD, Burroughs SM (2000) Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. J Manag 26(6):1113–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SP, Leigh TW (1996) A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. J Appl Psychol 81(4):358–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 6(1):3–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne ZS, Cropanzano R (2001) History of organizational justice: the founders speak. In: Cropanzano R (ed) Advances in organizational justice: From theory to application, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerman J, Cropanzano R, Vandenberghe C (2007) The benefits of justice for temporary workers. Group Organ Manag 32(2):176–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright S, Holmes N (2006) The meaning of work: the challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Hum Resour Dev Rev 16(2):199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio WF (2006) 10 global performance management systems. In: Stahl GL, Björkman I (eds) Handbook of research in international human resource management. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp 345–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassar V, Buttigieg SC (2015) Psychological contract breach, organizational justice and emotional well-being. Pers Rev 44(2):217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano WG (2013) Practices for engaging the 21st century workforce: challenges of talent management in a changing workplace. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE (2001) The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86(2):278–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MS, Bernerth JB, Walter F, Holt DT (2010) Organizational justice and individuals’ withdrawal: unlocking the influence of emotional exhaustion. J Manag Stud 47(3):367–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Greenberg J (2003) Organizational justice: a fair assessment of the state of the literature. In: Greenberg J (ed) Organizational behavior: the state of the science. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 165–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86(3):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Rodell JB, Long DM, Zapata CP, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ (2013) Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J Appl Psychol 98(2):199–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Ambrose ML (2001) Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda. Adv Organ Justice 12(284):119–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano RS, Ambrose ML (2015) Organizational justice: where we have been and where we are going. In: The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag 31(6):874–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Wright TA (2001) When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: a review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consult Psychol J Pract Res 53(3):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, Rupp DE (2001) Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. J Vocat Behav 58(2):164–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Prehar CA, Chen PY (2002) Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Org Manag 27(3):324–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Bowen DE, Gilliland SW (2007) The management of organizational justice. Acad Manag Perspect 21(4):34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Anthony EL, Daniels SR, Hall AV (2017) Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann 11(1):479–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton JE, Heaphy ED (2003) The power of high-quality connections. Posit Organ Scholarsh: Found New Disciplines 3:263–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q 44(2):350–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC (2004) Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: a group-level lens. In: Kramer RM, Cook KS (eds) Trust and distrust in organizations: dilemmas and approaches. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 239–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q 46(4):685–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1976) Social exchange theory. Annu Rev Sociol 2(1):335–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassina NE, Jones DA, Uggerslev KL (2008) Meta-analytic tests of relationships between organizational justice and citizenship behavior: testing agent-system and shared-variance models. J Organ Behav: J Occup Organ Psychol 29(6):805–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer JA, Sousa-Poza A (2009) Does job satisfaction improve the health of workers? New evidence using panel data and objective measures of health. Health Econ 18(1):71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger R, Konovsky MA (1989) Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Acad Manag J 32(1):115–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Mark Res 18(3):382–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox S, Spector PE (1999) A model of work frustration–aggression. J Organ Behav 20(6):915–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S, Klinger RL, Pezeshkan A, Vracheva V (2017) Psychological safety: a meta-analytic review and extension. Pers Psychol 70(1):113–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George JM, Zhou J (2007) Dual tuning in a supportive context: joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad Manag J 50(3):605–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman D, Boyatzis RE, McKee A (2013) Primal leadership: unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong Y, Cheung SY, Wang M, Huang JC (2012) Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. J Manag 38(5):1611–1633

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Social Rev 25:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, Ashford SJ (2008) The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res Organ Behav 28:3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J (1987) A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad Manag Rev 12:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J (1990) Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Manag 16:399–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory BT, Osmonbekov T, Gregory ST, Albritton MD, Carr JC (2013) Abusive supervision and citizenship behaviors: exploring boundary conditions. J Manag Psychol 28(6):628–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Singh S (2015) Leadership and creative performance behaviors in R&D laboratories: examining the mediating role of justice perceptions. J Leadersh Org Stud 22(1):21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaphy ED, Dutton JE (2008) Positive social interactions and the human body at work: linking organizations and physiology. Acad Manag Rev 33(1):137–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics R, Ghauri P (eds) New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 277–319

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James K (1993) The social context of organizational justice: cultural, intergroup and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In: Cropanzano R (ed) Justice in the workplace: approaching fairness in human resource management. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 21–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O (2000) Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol 73(3):287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Acad Manag J 44(5):1039–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O (2004) How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. J Organ Behav 25(2):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O, Van Yperen NW (2004) Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader- member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Acad Manag J 47(3):368–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manag J 33(4):692–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatepe OM (2015) Do personal resources mediate the effect of perceived organizational support on emotional exhaustion and job outcomes? Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 27(1):4–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark R, Carmeli A (2009) Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. J Organ Behav: J Occup Organ Psychol 30(6):785–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karriker JH, Williams ML (2009) Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: a mediated multifoci model. J Manag 35(1):112–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel M, Kratzer J, Schultz C (2012) Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creat Innov Manag 21(2):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan K, Abbas M, Gul A, Raja U (2015) Organizational justice and job outcomes: moderating role of Islamic work ethic. J Bus Ethics 126(2):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard MA, Roberson L, Rymph D (1996) Promoting fairness through subordinate training: the impact of communication style on manager’s effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert EG, Hogan N, Griffin ML (2007) The impact of distributive and procedural justice on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. J Crim Justice 35(6):644–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle JJ, Rupp DE, Brockner J (2007) Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: the target similarity model. J Manag 33(6):841–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Farh CI, Farh JL (2012) Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad Manag J 55(1):71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losada M, Heaphy E (2004) The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: a nonlinear dynamics model. Am Behav Sci 47(6):740–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans F (2002) Positive organizational behavior: developing and managing psychological strengths. Acad Manag Perspect 16(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ (2007) Psychological capital: investing and developing positive organizational behavior. Posit Organ Behav 1(2):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans F, Avey JB, Patera JL (2008) Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Acad Manag Learn Educ 7(2):209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu X (2016) Effect of organizational justice on work engagement with psychological safety as a mediator: evidence from China. J Soc Behav Pers 44(8):1359–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie JP (1997) The road to “root cause”: shop-floor problem solving at three auto assembly plants. Manag Sci 43(4):479–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey WH, Schneider B, Barbera KM, Young SA (2011) Employee engagement: tools for analysis, practice, and competitive advantage, vol 31. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire H (2002) Psychological contracts: are they still relevant. Career Dev Int 7(3):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason W, Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods 44(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000) Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad Manag J 43(4):738–748

    Google Scholar 

  • May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM (2004) The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J Occup Organ Psychol 77(1):11–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer JD, Salovey P (2007) Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test. Multi-Health Systems Incorporated, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron E, Erez M, Naveh E (2004) Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? J Organ Behav 25(2):175–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon H, Kamdar D, Mayer DM, Takeuchi R (2008) Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations. J Appl Psychol 93(1):84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman RH (1991) Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J Appl Psychol 76(6):845–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman RH, Niehoff BP, Organ DW (1993) Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Empl Responsib Rights J 6(3):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad Manag J 42(4):403–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff BP, Moorman RH (1993) Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad Manag J 36(3):527–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Notz WW, Starke FA (1987) Arbitration and distributive justice: equity or equality? J Appl Psychol 72(3):359–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1982) Reliability of measurement. In: Encyclopedia of educational research, vol 4. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J Exp Soc Psychol 45(4):867–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ DW (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ DW, Konovsky MA (1989) Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. J Appl Psychol 74:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ DW, Ryan K (1995) A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Pers Psychol 48(4):775–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Chen M, Hao Z, Bi W (2018) The effects of organizational justice on positive organizational behavior: evidence from a large-sample survey and a situational experiment. Front Psychol 8:2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci G, Chandler J (2014) Inside the Turk: understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 23(3):184–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parzefall MR, Seeck H, Leppänen A (2008) Employee innovativeness in organizations: a review of the antecedents. Finn J Bus Econ 2(08):165–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB (1997) The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: a review and suggestions for future research. Hum Perform 10:133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40(3):879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42(1):185–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quebbeman AJ, Rozell EJ (2002) Emotional intelligence and dispositional affectivity as moderators of workplace aggression: the impact on behavior choice. Hum Resour Dev Rev 12(1):125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RW (2007) Energizing others in work connections. In: Dutton JE, Ragins BR (eds) Exploring positive relationships at work: building a theoretical and research foundation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego A, Sousa F, Pina e Cunha M, Correia A, Saur-Amaral I (2007) Leader self-reported emotional intelligence and perceived employee creativity: an exploratory study. Creat Innov Manag 16(3):250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego A, Sousa F, Marques C, e Cunha MP (2012) Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. J Bus Res 65(3):429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp DE, Cropanzano R (2002) The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 89(1):925–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional intelligence. Imagin Cogn Pers 9(3):185–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH, Bennis WG (1965) Personal and organizational change through group methods: the laboratory approach. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M, Dörfel M (1999) Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. Eur J Soc Psychol 29(4):443–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol Assoc 55(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley CE (1995) Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Acad Manag J 38(2):483–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons AL (2011) The influence of openness to experience and organizational justice on creativity. Creat Res J 23(1):9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki DP, Folger R (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J Appl Psychol 82(3):434–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spell CS, Arnold TJ (2007) A multi-level analysis of organizational justice climate, structure, and employee mental health. J Manag 33(5):724–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, Sonenshein S, Grant AM (2005) A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ Sci 16(5):537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney PD, McFarlin DB (1997) Process and outcome: gender differences in the assessment of justice. J Organ Behav 18:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MS, Tracy KB, Renard MK, Harrison JK, Carroll SJ (1995) Due process in performance appraisal: a quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Adm Sci Q 40:495–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab AG, Takeuchi R, Taylor MS (2005) Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: the role of contract violations. Acad Manag J 48(1):146–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thamhain HJ (2003) Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Manag 33(3):297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut JW, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler TR, Bies RJ (1990) Beyond formal procedures: the interpersonal context of procedural justice. In: Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 77–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa FO, Schaubroeck J (2009) Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. J Appl Psychol 94(5):1275–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne SJ, Shore LM, Bommer WH, Tetrick LE (2002) The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange. J Appl Psychol 87:590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MA (1990) The social psychology of innovation in groups. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 309–335

    Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Andersen NR (1996) Innovation in top management teams. J Appl Psychol 81(6):680–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, GriYn RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18:293–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young LD (2012) How to promote innovative behavior at work? The role of justice and support within organizations. J Creat Behav 46(3):220–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, George JM (2001) When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Acad Manag J 44(4):682–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui AS, Pearce JL, Porter LW, Hite JP (1995) Choice of employee-organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors. In: Ferris GR (eds) Research in personnel and human resources management. JAI Press, Greenwich, Vol: 13, pp 117–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey

    Ayca Kubra Hizarci Payne & Alev Katrinli

Authors
  1. Ayca Kubra Hizarci Payne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alev Katrinli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayca Kubra Hizarci Payne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Woodbury University, North Hills, CA, USA

    Satinder Dhiman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Payne, A.K.H., Katrinli, A. (2020). The Mediation Effect of Psychological Safety on the Relationship Between Interactional Injustice and Innovative Work Behavior. In: Dhiman, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02470-3_47-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02470-3_47-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02470-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02470-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation