Abstract
Fluorescence microscopy has revolutionized the way live-cell imaging is achieved. At the same time, it is also potentially harmful to a living specimen. Therefore, the specimen must be monitored for viability and health before, during, and after imaging sessions. Methods for monitoring cell viability and health will be discussed in this chapter. Another key to successful live-cell imaging is to minimize light exposure as much as possible. A summary of strategies for minimizing light exposure including maximizing the light throughput of the microscope and the sensitivity of light detection is presented. Various fluorescence microscopy techniques are presented with a focus on how the light is delivered to the sample (i.e., light density) and pros and cons for use with living specimens. The reader is also directed to other publications that go into these topics in more detail. Methods are described on how to prepare samples for single cell migration assays, how to measure cell migration rates (e.g., bright-field, semi-automated, and automated), and how to measure focal adhesion turnover rates. Details of how to correct images for background intensity and field-illumination uniformity artifacts for quantitative imaging are also described. Overall, this chapter will be helpful to scientists who are interested in imaging live specimens using fluorescence microscopy techniques. It will be of particular interest to anyone wanting to perform quantitative fluorescence imaging, and wanting to measure cell migration rates, and focal adhesion dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clay RS, Court TH (1975) The history of the microscope. Holland Press, London
Clark G, Kasten FH (1983) History of staining, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Ellinger P, Hiert A (1929) Mikroskopische Beobachtungen an lebenden Organen mit Demonstrationen (Intravitalmikroskopie). Arch Exp Pathol Phar 147:63
Ploem JS (1967) The use of a vertical illuminator with interchangeable dichroic mirrors for fluorescence microscopy with incident light. Z Wiss Mikrosk 68:129–142
Coons AH, Kaplan MH (1950) Localization of antigen in tissue cells; improvements in a method for the detection of antigen by means of fluorescent antibody. J Exp Med 91:1–13
Kapuscinski J (1995) DAPI: a DNA-specific fluorescent probe. Biotech Histochem 70:220–233
Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802–805
Yefenof E, Klein G, Jondal M, Oldstone MB (1976) Surface markers on human B and T-lymphocytes. IX. Two-color immunoÂfluorescence studies on the association between ebv receptors and complement receptors on the surface of lymphoid cell lines. Int J Cancer 17:693–700
Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY (2005) A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods 2:905–909
Frigault MM, Lacoste J, Swift JL, Brown CM (2009) Live-cell microscopy—tips and tools. J Cell Sci 122:753–767
Lacoste J, Vining C, Zuo D, Spurmanis A, Brown CM (2011) Optimal conditions for live cell microscopy and raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS). In: Geddes CD (ed) Annual Reviews in Fluorescence 2010, Springer, New York
Lichtman JW, Conchello JA (2005) Fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods 2:910–919
Webb DJ, Brown CM (2012) Epi-fluorescence microscopy. In: Taatjes DJ, Roth J (eds) Methods in molecular biology. Springer, New York
Day RN, Schaufele F (2008) Fluorescent Âprotein tools for studying protein dynamics in living cells: a review. J Biomed Opt 13:031202
Galdeen SA, North AJ (2011) Live cell fluorescence microscopy techniques. Methods Mol Biol 769:205–222
Tsien RY (2005) Building and breeding molecules to spy on cells and tumors. FEBS Lett 579:927–932
Nishigaki T, Wood CD, Shiba K, Baba SA, Darszon A (2006) Stroboscopic illumination using light-emitting diodes reduces phototoxicity in fluorescence cell imaging. Biotechniques 41:191–197
Donnert G, Eggeling C, Hell SW (2007) Major signal increase in fluorescence microscopy through dark-state relaxation. Nat Methods 4:81–86
De AK, Goswami D (2009) A systematic study on fluorescence enhancement under single-photon pulsed illumination. J Fluoresc 19:931–937
Borlinghaus RT (2006) MRT letter: high speed scanning has the potential to increase fluorescence yield and to reduce photobleaching. Microsc Res Tech 69:689–692
Michalet X, Cheng A, Antelman J, Suyama M, Arisaka K, Weiss S (2008) Hybrid photodetector for single-molecule spectroscopy and microscopy. Proc Soc Photo Opt Instrum Eng 6862:68620F
Ockleford C (1995) The confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). J Pathol 176:1–2
Wilson T (2010) Spinning-disk microscopy systems. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010:pdb top88
Maddox PS (2008) Confocal imaging of cell division. Curr Protoc Cytom Chapter 12:Unit12 11
Wolleschensky R, Zimmermann B, Kempe M (2006) High-speed confocal fluorescence imaging with a novel line scanning microscope. J Biomed Opt 11:064011
Axelrod D (1981) Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence. J Cell Biol 89:141–145
Axelrod D (2008) Chapter 7: total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Methods Cell Biol 89:169–221
Hanley QS, Verveer PJ, Gemkow MJ, Arndt-Jovin D, Jovin TM (1999) An optical sectioning programmable array microscope implemented with a digital micromirror device. J Microsc 196:317–331
Hoebe RA, Van der Voort HT, Stap J, Van Noorden CJ, Manders EM (2008) Quantitative determination of the reduction of phototoxicity and photobleaching by controlled light exposure microscopy. J Microsc 231:9–20
Hoebe RA, Van Oven CH, Gadella TW Jr, Dhonukshe PB, Van Noorden CJ, Manders EM (2007) Controlled light-exposure microscopy reduces photobleaching and phototoxicity in fluorescence live-cell imaging. Nat Biotechnol 25:249–253
Caarls W, Rieger B, De Vries AH, Arndt-Jovin DJ, Jovin TM (2011) Minimizing light exposure with the programmable array microscope. J Microsc 241:101–110
Spector DL, Goldman RD (2010) Constructing and expressing fluorescent protein fusions. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010:pdb top87
Spector DL, Goldman RD (2010) Transfection of mammalian cells with fluorescent protein fusions. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010:pdb prot5517
Freshney IR (2005) Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique, 5th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York
Stack RF, Bayles CJ, Girard AM, Martin K, Opansky C, Schulz K, Cole RW (2011) Quality assurance testing for modern optical imaging systems. Microsc Microanal 17:598–606
Nyquist H (1928) Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Reprint as classic paper in: Proc IEEE 90(2):617–644, Feb 2002 46
Brown CM (2007) Fluorescence microscopy—avoiding the pitfalls. J Cell Sci 120:1703–1705
Webb DJ, Parsons JT, Horwitz AF (2002) Adhesion assembly, disassembly and turnover in migrating cells—over and over and over again. Nat Cell Biol 4:E97–E100
Webb DJ, Donais K, Whitmore LA, Thomas SM, Turner CE, Parsons JT, Horwitz AF (2004) FAK-Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat Cell Biol 6:154–161
Graf R, Rietdorf J, Zimmermann T (2005) Live cell spinning disk microscopy. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 95:57–75
Nayal A, Webb DJ, Brown CM, Schaefer EM, Vicente-Manzanares M, Horwitz AR (2006) Paxillin phosphorylation at Ser273 localizes a GIT1-PIX-PAK complex and regulates adhesion and protrusion dynamics. J Cell Biol 173:587–589
Zwier JM, Van Rooij GJ, Hofstraat JW, Brakenhoff GJ (2004) Image calibration in fluorescence microscopy. J Microsc 216:15–24
Wolf DE, Samarasekera C, Swedlow JR (2007) Quantitative analysis of digital microscope images. In: Methods in cell biology. Elsevier Inc, Vol 81, pp 365–396
Model MA, Blank JL (2008) Concentrated dyes as a source of two-dimensional fluorescent field for characterization of a confocal microscope. J Microsc 229:12–16
Carlton PM, Boulanger J, Kervrann C, Sibarita JB, Salamero J, Gordon-Messer S, Bressan D, Haber JE, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Matsuda A, Kner P, Uzawa S, Gustafsson M, Kam Z, Agard DA, Sedat JW (2010) Fast live simultaneous multiwavelength four-dimensional optical microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:16016–16022
Acknowledgments
Images for this chapter were collected at the McGill University Life Sciences Complex Imaging Facility funded by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and the Ministère du Développement économique, Innovation et Exportation—Québec (MDEIE) and the Cell Imaging and Analysis Network (CIAN), also funded by the CFI. Thank you to users and colleagues of CIAN, the McGill Imaging facility, MIA Cellavie, the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities, The Canadian Cytometry and Microscopy Association (CCMA) and corporate application scientists with whom we constantly interact. Thank you to everyone who read the chapter and gave us valuable constructive feedback. To Ji-Sook Lee for critical reading of the chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Lacoste, J., Young, K., Brown, C.M. (2012). Live-Cell Migration and Adhesion Turnover Assays. In: Taatjes, D., Roth, J. (eds) Cell Imaging Techniques. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 931. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-055-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-056-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols