Skip to main content

Understanding G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allostery via Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Implications for Drug Discovery

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1762))

Abstract

Unraveling the mystery of protein allostery has been one of the greatest challenges in both structural and computational biology. However, recent advances in computational methods, particularly molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, have led to its utility as a powerful and popular tool for the study of protein allostery. By capturing the motions of a protein’s constituent atoms, simulations can enable the discovery of allosteric hot spots and the determination of the mechanistic basis for allostery. These structural and dynamic studies can provide a foundation for a wide range of applications, including rational drug design and protein engineering. In our laboratory, the use of MD simulations and network analysis assisted in the elucidation of the allosteric hotspots and intracellular signal transduction of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), primarily on one of the adenosine receptor subtypes, A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR). In this chapter, we describe a method for calculating the map of allosteric signal flow in different GPCR conformational states and illustrate how these concepts have been utilized in understanding the mechanism of GPCR allostery. These structural studies will provide valuable insights into the allosteric and orthosteric modulations that would be of great help to design novel drugs targeting GPCRs in pathological states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Gentry PR, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A (2015) Novel allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 290(32):19478–19488. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.662759

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenbaum DM, Rasmussen SG, Kobilka BK (2009) The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 459(7245):356–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08144

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen AA, Spalding TA (2004) Allosteric modulation of G-protein coupled receptors. Eur J Pharm Sci 21(4):407–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2003.11.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katritch V, Cherezov V, Stevens RC (2012) Diversity and modularity of G protein-coupled receptor structures. Trends Pharmacol Sci 33(1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2011.09.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choe HW, Park JH, Kim YJ, Ernst OP (2011) Transmembrane signaling by GPCRs: insight from rhodopsin and opsin structures. Neuropharmacology 60(1):52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.07.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dror RO, Dirks RM, Grossman JP, Xu H, Shaw DE (2012) Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu Rev Biophys 41:429–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sethi A, Eargle J, Black AA, Luthey-Schulten Z (2009) Dynamical networks in tRNA:protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(16):6620–6625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810961106

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao XQ, Grant BJ (2013) Domain-opening and dynamic coupling in the alpha-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. Biophys J 105(2):L08–L10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miao Y, Nichols SE, Gasper PM, Metzger VT, McCammon JA (2013) Activation and dynamic network of the M2 muscarinic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(27):10982–10987. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309755110

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825):268–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411(6833):41–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/35075138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL (2000) The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407(6804):651–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/35036627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitley MJ, Lee AL (2009) Frameworks for understanding long-range intra-protein communication. Curr Protein Pept Sci 10(2):116–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Ruvo M, Giuliani A, Paci P, Santoni D, Di Paola L (2012) Shedding light on protein-ligand binding by graph theory: the topological nature of allostery. Biophys Chem 165–166:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2012.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Atilgan AR, Akan P, Baysal C (2004) Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophys J 86(1 Pt 1):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74086-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amitai G, Shemesh A, Sitbon E, Shklar M, Netanely D, Venger I, Pietrokovski S (2004) Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol 344(4):1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagler G, Sinha S (2007) Assortative mixing in protein contact networks and protein folding kinetics. Bioinformatics 23(14):1760–1767. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brinda KV, Vishveshwara S (2005) A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. Biophys J 89(6):4159–4170. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.064485

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dokholyan NV, Li L, Ding F, Shakhnovich EI (2002) Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(13):8637–8641. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122076099

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaczor AA, Rutkowska E, Bartuzi D, Targowska-Duda KM, Matosiuk D, Selent J (2016) Computational methods for studying G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Methods Cell Biol 132:359–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2015.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee Y, Jeong LS, Choi S, Hyeon C (2011) Link between allosteric signal transduction and functional dynamics in a multisubunit enzyme: S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. J Am Chem Soc 133(49):19807–19815. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2066175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee Y, Choi S, Hyeon C (2014) Mapping the intramolecular signal transduction of G-protein coupled receptors. Proteins 82(5):727–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee Y, Choi S, Hyeon C (2015) Communication over the network of binary switches regulates the activation of A2A adenosine receptor. PLoS Comput Biol 11(2):e1004044. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004044

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buck M, Bouguet-Bonnet S, Pastor RW, AD MK Jr (2006) Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme. Biophys J 90(4):L36–L38. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.078154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16):1781–1802. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20289

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zoete V, Cuendet MA, Grosdidier A, Michielin O (2011) SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J Comput Chem 32(11):2359–2368. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38. 27–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bjarnadottir TK, Gloriam DE, Hellstrand SH, Kristiansson H, Fredriksson R, Schioth HB (2006) Comprehensive repertoire and phylogenetic analysis of the G protein-coupled receptors in human and mouse. Genomics 88(3):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.04.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dima RI, Thirumalai D (2006) Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis. Protein Sci 15(2):258–268. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.051767306

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. da Silveira CH, Pires DE, Minardi RC, Ribeiro C, Veloso CJ, Lopes JC, Meira W Jr, Neshich G, Ramos CH, Habesch R, Santoro MM (2009) Protein cutoff scanning: a comparative analysis of cutoff dependent and cutoff free methods for prospecting contacts in proteins. Proteins 74(3):727–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(79):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Networks 27:55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Park K, Kim D (2011) Modeling allosteric signal propagation using protein structure networks. BMC Bioinformatics 12(Suppl 1):S23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S1-S23

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Math 1(1):269–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01386390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Newman MEJ (2005) A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc Networks 27(1):39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brandes U (2001) A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Math Sociol 25(2):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Qin J, Xu JJ, Hu D, Sageman M, Chen H (2005) Analyzing terrorist networks: a case study of the global salafi jihad network. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3495:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Singer Y (2006) Dynamic measure of network robustness. In: IEEE 24th convention of electrical and electronics engineers, Israel, 2006, pp 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEI.2006.321105

  39. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406(6794):378–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. del Sol A, Fujihashi H, Amoros D, Nussinov R (2006) Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. Mol Syst Biol 2:2006.0019. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100063

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fritze O, Filipek S, Kuksa V, Palczewski K, Hofmann KP, Ernst OP (2003) Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(5):2290–2295. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0435715100

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shi L, Liapakis G, Xu R, Guarnieri F, Ballesteros JA, Javitch JA (2002) Beta2 adrenergic receptor activation. Modulation of the proline kink in transmembrane 6 by a rotamer toggle switch. J Biol Chem 277(43):40989–40996. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M206801200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Trzaskowski B, Latek D, Yuan S, Ghoshdastider U, Debinski A, Filipek S (2012) Action of molecular switches in GPCRs – theoretical and experimental studies. Curr Med Chem 19(8):1090–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Unal H, Karnik SS (2012) Domain coupling in GPCRs: the engine for induced conformational changes. Trends Pharmacol Sci 33(2):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2011.09.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bahar I, Lezon TR, Bakan A, Shrivastava IH (2010) Normal mode analysis of biomolecular structures: functional mechanisms of membrane proteins. Chem Rev 110(3):1463–1497. https://doi.org/10.1021/Cr900095e

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Thirumuruganandham SP, Urbassek HM (2009) Low-frequency vibrational modes and infrared absorbance of red, blue and green opsin. J Mol Model 15(8):959–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-008-0446-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Suel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R (2003) Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 10(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lockless SW, Ranganathan R (1999) Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286(5438):295–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zheng W, Brooks BR, Doniach S, Thirumalai D (2005) Network of dynamically important residues in the open/closed transition in polymerases is strongly conserved. Structure 13(4):565–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2005.01.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Third international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, San Jose, CA, May 2009. pp 361–362

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mid-career Researcher Program (NRF-2017R1A2B4010084) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun Choi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Basith, S., Lee, Y., Choi, S. (2018). Understanding G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allostery via Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Implications for Drug Discovery. In: Gore, M., Jagtap, U. (eds) Computational Drug Discovery and Design. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1762. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7756-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7756-7_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7755-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7756-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics