Skip to main content

Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Quantitative Trait

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1666))

Abstract

Model-free methods of linkage analysis for quantitative traits are a class of easily implemented, computationally efficient and statistically robust approaches to searching for linkage to a quantitative trait. By “model-free” we refer to methods of linkage analysis that do not fully specify a genetic model (i.e., the causal allele frequency, and penetrance functions). In this chapter we briefly survey the methods that are available, and then we discuss the necessary steps to implement an analysis using the programs GENIBD, SIBPAL and RELPAL in the S.A.G.E. (Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology) software suite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Haseman JK, Elston RC (1972) The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet 2:3–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elston RC, Buxbaum S, Jacobs KB, Olson JM (2000) Haseman and Elston revisited. Genet Epidemiol 19:1–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shete S, Jacobs KB, Elston RC (2003) Adding further power to the haseman and elston method for detecting linkage in larger sibships: weighting sums and differences. Hum Hered 55:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang T, Elston RC (2004) A modified revisited Haseman-Elston method to further improve power. Hum Hered 57:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amos CI (1994) Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 54:535–543

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Almasy L, Blangero J (1998) Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 62:1198–1211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Allison DB, Neale MC, Zannolli R, Schork NJ, Amos CI, Blangero J (1999) Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure. Am J Hum Genet 65:531–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sham PC, Purcell S (2001) Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs. Am J Hum Genet 68:1527–1532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen WM, Broman KW, Liang KY (2004) Quantitative trait linkage analysis by generalized estimating equations: unification of variance components and Haseman-Elston regression. Genet Epidemiol 26:265–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldgar DE (1990) Multipoint analysis of human quantitative genetic variation. Am J Hum Genet 47:957–967

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang T, Elston RC (2005) Two-level Haseman-Elston regression for general pedigree data analysis. Genet Epidemiol 29:12–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange KL, Little RJA, Taylor JMG (1989) Robust statistical modeling using the T distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 84:881–896

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blangero J, Williams JT, Almasy L (2000) Robust LOD scores for variance component-based linkage analysis. Genet Epidemiol 19:S8–S14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen WM, Broman KW, Liang KY (2005) Power and robustness of linkage tests for quantitative traits in general pedigrees. Genet Epidemiol 28:11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR (2001) Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 30:97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cardon LR, Smith SD, Fulker DW, Kimberling WJ, Pennington BF, DeFries JC (1994) Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6. Science 266:276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardon LR, Smith SD, Fulker DW, Kimberling WJ, Pennington BF, DeFries JC (1995) Quantitative trait locus for reading disability: correction. Science 268:1553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goode EL, Jarvik GP (2005) Assessment and implications of linkage disequilibrium in genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite panels. Genet Epidemiol 29:S72–S76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kong X, Murphy K, Raj T, He C, White PS, Matise TC (2004) A combined linkage-physical map of the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 75:1143–1148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Matise TC, Chen F, Chen W, De La Vega FM, Hansen M, He C, Hyland FCL, Kennedy GC, Kong X, Murray SS (2007) A second-generation combined linkage–physical map of the human genome. Genome Res 17:1783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinha R, Gray-McGuire C (2008) Haseman Elston regression in ascertained samples: importance of dependent variable and mean correction factor selection. Hum Hered 65:66–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris NJ (2009) Multivariate and structural equation models for family data. Hum Hered 70:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan J. Morris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Morris, N.J., Stein, C.M. (2017). Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Quantitative Trait. In: Elston, R. (eds) Statistical Human Genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1666. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7273-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7274-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics