Abstract
Design for manufacture and assembly (DFM) has typically meant that designers should tailor their designs to eliminate manufacturing difficulties and minimize manufacturing, assembly, and logistics costs. However, the capabilities of additive manufacturing technologies provide an opportunity to rethink DFM to take advantage of the unique capabilities of these technologies. As mentioned in Chap. 16, several companies are now using AM technologies for production manufacturing. For example, Siemens, Phonak, Widex, and the other hearing aid manufacturers use selective laser sintering and stereolithography machines to produce hearing aid shells; Align Technology uses stereolithography to fabricate molds for producing clear dental braces (“aligners”); and Boeing and its suppliers use polymer powder bed fusion (PBF) to produce ducts and similar parts for F-17 fighter jets. For hearing aids and dental aligners, AM machines enable manufacturing of tens to hundreds of thousands of parts, where each part is uniquely customized based upon person-specific geometric data. In the case of aircraft components, AM technology enables low-volume manufacturing, easy integration of design changes and, at least as importantly, piece part reductions to greatly simplify product assembly.
The unique capabilities of AM include: shape complexity, in that it is possible to build virtually any shape; hierarchical complexity, in that hierarchical multiscale structures can be designed and fabricated from the microstructure through geometric mesostructure (sizes in the millimeter range) to the part-scale macrostructure; material complexity, in that material can be processed one point, or one layer, at a time; and functional complexity, in that fully functional assemblies and mechanisms can be fabricated directly using AM processes. These unique capabilities enable new opportunities for customization, very significant improvements in product performance, multifunctionality, and lower overall manufacturing costs. These capabilities will be expanded upon in Sects. 17.3 and 17.4.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Design for manufacturing is typically abbreviated DFM, whereas design for manufacture and assembly is typically abbreviated as DFMA. To avoid confusion with the abbreviation for design for additive manufacturing (DFAM), we have utilized the shorter abbreviation DFM to encompass both design for manufacture and design for assembly.
References
Susman GI (1992) Integrating design and manufacturing for competitive advantage. Oxford University Press, New York
Bralla JG (ed) (1986) Handbook of product design for manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New York
Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W (1994) Product design for manufacture and assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York
Shah J, Wright PK (2000) Developing theoretical foundations of DFM. ASME design for manufacturing conference, Baltimore, MD
Rosen DW, Chen Y, Sambu S, Allen JK, Mistree F (2003) The rapid tooling testbed: a distributed design-for-manufacturing system. Rapid Prototyp J 9(3):122–132
3D Systems, Inc. http://www.3dsystems.com
Hague RJM (2006) Unlocking the design potential of rapid manufacturing. In: Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (eds) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age, Chap. 2. Wiley, Chichester
Mavroidis C, DeLaurentis KJ, Won J, Alam M (2002) Fabrication of non-assembly mechanisms and robotic systems using rapid prototyping. ASME J Mech Des 123:516–524
Kataria A, Rosen DW (2001) Building around inserts: methods for fabricating complex devices in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 7(5):253–261
Binnard M (1999) Design by composition for rapid prototyping, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Norwell
Patil L, Dutta D, Bhatt AD, Lyons K, Jurrens K, Pratt MJ, Sriram RD (2000) Representation of heterogeneous objects in ISO 10303 (STEP). Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Mechanical Engineering Division, Orlando, FL, November, pp 355–364
Boeing Corp. http://www.boeing.com
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ashby MF, Evans A, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn
Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2001) Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids 49(8):1747–1769
Wang J, Evans AG, Dharmasena K, Wadley HNG (2003) On the performance of truss panels with Kagome cores. Int J Solids Struct 40:6981–6988
Wang A-J, McDowell DL (2003) Optimization of a metal honeycomb sandwich beam-bar subjected to torsion and bending. Int J Solids Struct 40(9):2085–2099
Nguyen J, Park S-I, Rosen DW (2013) Heuristic optimization method for cellular structure design of light weight components. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(6):1071–1078
Kytannen J (2006) Rapid manufacture for the retail industry. In: Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (eds) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age, Chap. 18. Wiley, Chichester
Rosen DW (2007) Computer-aided design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Comput Aided Des Appl 4(5):585–594
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Research Group, Nottingham University, UK. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/3dprg/index.aspx
Beaman JJ, Atwood C, Bergman TL, Bourell D, Hollister S, Rosen D (2004) Assessment of European Research and Development in Additive/Subtractive Manufacturing, final report from WTEC panel. http://wtec.org/additive/report/welcome.htm
Ensz M, Storti D, Ganter M (1998) Implicit methods for geometry creation. Int J Comput Geom Appl 8(5, 6):509–536
Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (1999) Meshfree simulation of deforming domains. Comput Aided Des 31(7):459–471
Zeid I (2005) Mastering CAD/CAM. McGraw-Hill, New York
Rvachev VL, Sheiko TI, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (2001) Transfinite interpolation over implicitly defined sets. Comput Aided Geom Des 18:195–220
Michell AGM (1904) The limits of economy of material in frame structures. Philos Mag 8:589–597
Dewhurst P, Srithongchai S (2005) An Investigation of minimum-weight dual-material symmetrically loaded wheels and torsion arms. ASME J Appl Mech 72:196–202
Baldick R (2006) Applied optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Qi X, Wang MY, Shi T (2013) A method for shape and topology optimization of truss-like structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 47:687–697
Patel J, Choi S-K (2012) Classification approach for reliability-based topology optimization using probabilistic neural networks. Struct Multidisc Optim 45(4):529–543
Bendsoe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1(193–202):1989
Sigmund O (2001) A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:120–127
Rozvany GIN (2009) A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 37:217–237
Suresh K (2013) Efficient generation of large-scale pareto-optimal topologies. Struct Multidisc Optim 47:49–61
Wei P, Wang MW (2009) Piecewise constant level set method for structural topology optimization. Int J Numer Meth Engng 78:379–402
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B. (2015). Design for Additive Manufacturing. In: Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_17
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2112-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2113-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)