Skip to main content

Species Concepts

The Tested, the Untestable, and the Redundant

  • Chapter
Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution

Part of the book series: Advances in Primatology ((AIPR))

Abstract

The Random House College Dictionary of 1968 gives as the first of several listed definitions of the word theory: “a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena.” It is in this sense that I will use the concept of theory in this chapter. I would like to add that all sorts of connections between carefully tested concepts, which serve as units of thought and which have objectively established perceptual bases in reality, are usually built into a framework that is often called a theory. These theories, and others within them, are all ultimately tested against sundry aspects of objective reality. The methodology itself employed in taxonomic practice, which is an invented human activity and not a reality of nature, should be based on, follow, or fall out of the tested (not merely testable) theories of evolutionary biology.

Concepts of method designate systematic courses of action devised by men for the purpose of achieving certain goals... [these]... represent part of man’s conceptual equipment. Epistemology is a science devoted to the discovery of the proper methods of acquiring and validating knowledge.

Ayn Rand (1966, p. 36)

If a taxon is defined (as a morphospecies) in such a way that it coincides with the phenon, the taxonomist may facilitate the task of sorting specimens, but this activity will result in “species” that are biologically, and hence scientifically, meaningless. The objective of a scientifically sound concept of the species category is to facilitate the assembling of phena into biologically meaningful taxa on the species level.

Mayr and Ashlock (1991, p. 24)

In the time dimension, therefore, species can only be defined arbitrarily or with reference to compartment limits set by contemporary organisms, or organisms from some other, arbitrarily selected transect of time-character space.

Andersson (1990, p. 378)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersson, L. 1990. The driving force: species concepts and ecology. Taxon 39:375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, J. D. 1990. Metaspecies and modes of speciation in the analysis of faunal turnover of Judithian-Clarkforkian mammals. J Vert. Paleo 9:13A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ax, P. 1987. The Phylogenese System The Systematization of Organisms on the Basis of their Phylogenesis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J. 1977. Adaptation and the comparative method, in: Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, M. K. Hecht, P. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), NATO Adv. Inst. Sci. A 14:57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J. 1979. A synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change—a reductionistic approach. Bull. Cam. Mus. 13:20–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J. 1981. Functional-adaptive analysis in evolutionary classification. Am Zool 21:5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J. 1986. Species concepts, speciation, and macroevolution, in: Modern Aspects of Species, K. Iwatsuki, P. H. Raven, and W. J. Bock (eds.), pp. 31–57. Tokyo Univ. of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J. and von Wahlert, G. 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19:269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. A., Orr, H. A., and Futuyma, D. J. 1988. Do we need a new species concept? Syst. Zool. 37:190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr Ornith. 1:159–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Phil. Sci. 55:238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M. J. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4:317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M.J. 1990a. Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson’s version of cladistics. Cladistics 6:61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M.J. 1990b. Phylogenetic systematics and species revisited Cladistics 6:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1985. The ontology of species, in: E S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 17–20. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Method and Theory in Comparative Biology Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Novacek, M.J. 1985. Systematics and paleobiology. Paleobiology 11:65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T 1991. Classical and molecular phylogenetics. Boll. Zool. 58:289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M. K. and Edwards, J. L. 1977 The methodology of phylogenetic inference above the species level, in: M. K. Hecht, P. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, NATO Adv. Inst. Ser A, 14:3–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellog, D. 1988. “And then a miracle occurs”—weak links in the chain of arguments from punctuation to hierarchy. Biol. Phil. 3:3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1988. The why and how of species Biol Phil. 3:431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. and Ashlock, P. D. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickevich, M. F. and Weller, S.J. 1990. Evolutionary character analysis: tracing character change on a cladogram. Cladistics 6:137–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B. D. and Brandon, R. N. 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Phil. 2:397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, N. A. 1986. A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Syst. Zool. 35:110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 21–29. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A. 1966. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology The Objectivist, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, D. and Crowe, T. M 1987 The recognition species concept: is it really an alternative? South Afr. J. Sci. 83:530–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoble, M. J. 1985. The species in systematics, in: E S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 31–34. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1951. The species concept. Evolution 5:285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuessy, T. F. 1980. Cladistics and plant systematics: problems and prospects. Introduction. Syst. Bot. 5:109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuessy, T. F. 1987. Explicit approaches for evolutionary classification. Syst. Bot. 12:251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F. S. 1991. The unresolved world between taxonomy and population biology: what is, and what is not, macroevolution? J. Hum. Evol. 20:271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F. S. and Bock, W. J. 1991. Evolutionary theory and systematics: relationships between process and patterns. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-Forsch. 29:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. M. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. M. 1988. Species, sets, and the derivative nature of philosophy. Bio. Phil. 3:49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S. 1985. Introductory comments on species and speciation, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. ix–xviii. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S. and Eldredge, N. 1984. Individuals, hierarchies and processes: toward a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 10:146–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Q. D. and Nixon, K. C. 1990 Another way of looking at the species problem: a reply to de Queiroz and Donoghue. Cladistics 6:77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willman, R. 1985. Die Art in Raum und Zeit. Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willman, R. 1989. Evolutionary or biological species? Abh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 28:95–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szalay, F.S. (1993). Species Concepts. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (eds) Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3747-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3745-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics