Abstract
The Random House College Dictionary of 1968 gives as the first of several listed definitions of the word theory: “a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena.” It is in this sense that I will use the concept of theory in this chapter. I would like to add that all sorts of connections between carefully tested concepts, which serve as units of thought and which have objectively established perceptual bases in reality, are usually built into a framework that is often called a theory. These theories, and others within them, are all ultimately tested against sundry aspects of objective reality. The methodology itself employed in taxonomic practice, which is an invented human activity and not a reality of nature, should be based on, follow, or fall out of the tested (not merely testable) theories of evolutionary biology.
Concepts of method designate systematic courses of action devised by men for the purpose of achieving certain goals... [these]... represent part of man’s conceptual equipment. Epistemology is a science devoted to the discovery of the proper methods of acquiring and validating knowledge.
Ayn Rand (1966, p. 36)
If a taxon is defined (as a morphospecies) in such a way that it coincides with the phenon, the taxonomist may facilitate the task of sorting specimens, but this activity will result in “species” that are biologically, and hence scientifically, meaningless. The objective of a scientifically sound concept of the species category is to facilitate the assembling of phena into biologically meaningful taxa on the species level.
Mayr and Ashlock (1991, p. 24)
In the time dimension, therefore, species can only be defined arbitrarily or with reference to compartment limits set by contemporary organisms, or organisms from some other, arbitrarily selected transect of time-character space.
Andersson (1990, p. 378)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersson, L. 1990. The driving force: species concepts and ecology. Taxon 39:375–382.
Archibald, J. D. 1990. Metaspecies and modes of speciation in the analysis of faunal turnover of Judithian-Clarkforkian mammals. J Vert. Paleo 9:13A.
Ax, P. 1987. The Phylogenese System The Systematization of Organisms on the Basis of their Phylogenesis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Bock, W.J. 1977. Adaptation and the comparative method, in: Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, M. K. Hecht, P. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), NATO Adv. Inst. Sci. A 14:57–82.
Bock, W.J. 1979. A synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change—a reductionistic approach. Bull. Cam. Mus. 13:20–69.
Bock, W. J. 1981. Functional-adaptive analysis in evolutionary classification. Am Zool 21:5–20.
Bock, W. J. 1986. Species concepts, speciation, and macroevolution, in: Modern Aspects of Species, K. Iwatsuki, P. H. Raven, and W. J. Bock (eds.), pp. 31–57. Tokyo Univ. of Tokyo Press.
Bock, W.J. and von Wahlert, G. 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19:269–299.
Coyne, J. A., Orr, H. A., and Futuyma, D. J. 1988. Do we need a new species concept? Syst. Zool. 37:190–200.
Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr Ornith. 1:159–187.
de Queiroz, K. 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Phil. Sci. 55:238–259.
de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M. J. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4:317–338.
de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M.J. 1990a. Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson’s version of cladistics. Cladistics 6:61–75.
de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M.J. 1990b. Phylogenetic systematics and species revisited Cladistics 6:83–90.
Futuyma, D.J. 1986. Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Eldredge, N. 1985. The ontology of species, in: E S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 17–20. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Method and Theory in Comparative Biology Columbia University Press, New York.
Eldredge, N. and Novacek, M.J. 1985. Systematics and paleobiology. Paleobiology 11:65–74.
Ghiselin, M. T 1991. Classical and molecular phylogenetics. Boll. Zool. 58:289–294.
Hecht, M. K. and Edwards, J. L. 1977 The methodology of phylogenetic inference above the species level, in: M. K. Hecht, P. Goody, and B. M. Hecht (eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution, NATO Adv. Inst. Ser A, 14:3–51.
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Kellog, D. 1988. “And then a miracle occurs”—weak links in the chain of arguments from punctuation to hierarchy. Biol. Phil. 3:3–28.
Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Mayr, E. 1988. The why and how of species Biol Phil. 3:431–441.
Mayr, E. and Ashlock, P. D. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mickevich, M. F. and Weller, S.J. 1990. Evolutionary character analysis: tracing character change on a cladogram. Cladistics 6:137–170.
Mishler, B. D. and Brandon, R. N. 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Phil. 2:397–414.
Neff, N. A. 1986. A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Syst. Zool. 35:110–123.
Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 21–29. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
Rand, A. 1966. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology The Objectivist, Inc., New York.
Raubenheimer, D. and Crowe, T. M 1987 The recognition species concept: is it really an alternative? South Afr. J. Sci. 83:530–534.
Scoble, M. J. 1985. The species in systematics, in: E S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 31–34. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
Simpson, G. G. 1951. The species concept. Evolution 5:285–298.
Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.
Stuessy, T. F. 1980. Cladistics and plant systematics: problems and prospects. Introduction. Syst. Bot. 5:109–111.
Stuessy, T. F. 1987. Explicit approaches for evolutionary classification. Syst. Bot. 12:251–262.
Szalay, F. S. 1991. The unresolved world between taxonomy and population biology: what is, and what is not, macroevolution? J. Hum. Evol. 20:271–280.
Szalay, F. S. and Bock, W. J. 1991. Evolutionary theory and systematics: relationships between process and patterns. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-Forsch. 29:1–39.
Van Valen, L. M. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233–239.
Van Valen, L. M. 1988. Species, sets, and the derivative nature of philosophy. Bio. Phil. 3:49–66.
Vrba, E. S. 1985. Introductory comments on species and speciation, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. ix–xviii. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria
Vrba, E. S. and Eldredge, N. 1984. Individuals, hierarchies and processes: toward a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 10:146–171.
Wheeler, Q. D. and Nixon, K. C. 1990 Another way of looking at the species problem: a reply to de Queiroz and Donoghue. Cladistics 6:77–81.
Wiley, E. O. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27:17–26.
Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
Willman, R. 1985. Die Art in Raum und Zeit. Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.
Willman, R. 1989. Evolutionary or biological species? Abh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 28:95–110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szalay, F.S. (1993). Species Concepts. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (eds) Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3747-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3745-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive