Skip to main content

The Importance of Species Taxa in Paleoanthropology and an Argument for the Phylogenetic Concept of the Species Category

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Primatology ((AIPR))

Abstract

Paleoanthropology attempts to describe the diversity of extinct primate forms, to interpret this diversity in a phylogenetic framework based on the distribution of shared evolutionary novelties, and to explain the emergence and transformation of novelties in terms of a positive causal relationship between changes in structure/function and enhanced organismal fitness (i.e., adaptation). These components may be viewed as a sequence of steps toward a “complete” explanation of evolutionary change, each step logically contingent on those preceding it. Thus, hypotheses seeking to explain the adaptive basis of evolutionary morphological change necessarily depend on the prior acceptance of a hypothesis of vectored phylogenetic change. In turn, a phylogenetic hypothesis must be grounded in some theoretical concept of the units of diversity, among which the pattern of phylogenetic relationships is sought.

Assuming for the moment that history could be analyzed completely into a single set of atomistic elements, there are infinitely many ways these elements can be organized into historical sequences. The role of the central subject is to form the main strand around which the historical narrative is woven... The important feature of central subjects is that from the point of view of the historical narrative associated with them, they are individuals. The identity and continuity of such individuals can be and must be determined independently of the events that make up the narrative.

David Hull (1975, p. 255)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, P. 1984. An alternative interpretation of the characters used to define Homo erectus Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 69:167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J. 1979. The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change: a reductionist approach. Bull. Carnegie Mus Nat. Hist. 13:20–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, G. 1990. The occurrence of some controversial Homo erectus cranial features in the Zhoukoudian and East African hominids. Acta Anthropol. Simca 9:350–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, R., and Robinson, J. T. 1950. Further evidence of the structure of the Sterkfontein ape-man Plesianthropus Transvaal Mus. Mem. 4:11–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. J. 1960. Animal Species and Their Evolution Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, A. T 1989. Variations within Homo habdis, in: Hominidae: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Human Paleontology, pp. 175–181. Jaca Book, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A. 1988. Some thoughts on the Black Skull: An archeologist’s assessment of WT-17000 (A. boisei) and systematics in human paleontology. Am Anthropol 90:357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., and Lindly, J. M. 1989. The case for continuity: observations on the biocultural transition in Europe and western Asia, in: P. Mellars, and C. Stringer (eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives in the Origins of Modern Humans, pp 626–676. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. J. 1977. The Cranium of the Swartkrans Hominid SK 847 and its Relevance to Human Origins. Ph.D. thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. J. 1988. A new Australopithecus cranium from Sterkfontein and its bearing on the ancestry of Paranthropus, in: F. E. Grine (ed.), Evolutionary Biology of the “Robust” Australopithecines, pp. 285–292. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. J. 1990. Observations on some restored hominid specimens in the Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, in: G. H. Sperber (ed.), From Apes to Angels: Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Phillip V. Tobias, pp. 135–151. Wiley-Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr Ormthol 1:159–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1987. Species concepts and the ontology of evolution. Biol. Philos. 2:329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1989a. Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation, in: D. Otte and J. A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences, pp. 28–59. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1989b. Species as entities in biological theory, in: M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, pp. 31–52. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Philos. Sci. 55:238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst Zool 39:307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. C., and Wood, B. A. 1982. Basicranial anatomy of Plio-Pleistocene hominids from East and South Africa. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 59:157–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delson, E. 1993. How many species of Homo in Europe? NATO Scientific Affairs Division Advanced Research Workshop: “Les Premiers Peuplements Humains de l’Europe” (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1985. Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feibel, C., Brown, F. H., and McDougall, I. 1989 Stratigraphie context of fossil hominids from the Omo Group deposits: northern Turkana basin, Kenya and Ethiopia. Am. J Phys. Anthropol. 78:595–622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghisehn, M. T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem. Syst. Zool. 23:536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. 1984. “Definition,” “character,” and other equivocal terms. Syst. Zool 33:104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. 1987. Species concepts, individuality and objectivity. Biol. Philos. 2:127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häuser, C. L. 1987. The debate about the biological species concept: a review. Zool. Syst Evolut.-Forsch. 25:241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hublin, J. J. 1986. Some comments on the diagnostic features of Homo erectus. Anthropos (Brno) 23:175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1975. Central subjects and historical narratives. Hist. Theory 14:253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1976. Are species really individuals? Syst. Zool. 25:174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1978. A matter of individuality. Philos. Sci. 45:335–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1987. Genealogical actors in ecological roles. Biol. Philos. 2:168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, D. C., Masao, F. T., Eck, G. G., White, T. D., Walter, R. C., Kimbel, W. H., Asfaw, B., Manega, P., Ndessokia, P., and Suwa, G. 1987. A new partial skeleton of Homo habilis from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 327:205–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. E. 1991. On the autapomorphic traits of Homo erectus. J. Hum. Evol. 20:375–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. H. 1986. Calvarial Remains of Australopithecus afarensis: A Comparative Phylogenetic Study. Ph.D. thesis, Kent State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. H. 1991. Species, species concepts and hominid evolution. J . Hum. Evol. 20:355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. H., and Rak, Y. 1985. Functional morphology of the asterionic region in extant homi-noids and fossil hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 66:31–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. H., and White, T. D. 1988. Variation, sexual dimorphism and the taxonomy of Australopithecus, in: F. E. Grine (ed.), Evolutionary Biology of the “Robust” Australopithecines, pp. 175–192. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. K., White, T. D., and Johanson, D. C. 1984. Cranial morphology of Australopithecus afarensis: a comparative study based on a composite reconstruction of the adult skull. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 64:337–388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. G. 1990. Species as historical individuals. Biol. Philos 5:417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, R. E., Walker, A., Ward, C. V., and Grausz, H. M. 1989. A partial skeleton of a gracile hominid from the upper Burgi Member of the Koobi Fora Formation, East Lake Turkana, Kenya, 167–173. Hominidae. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Human Paleontology. Jaca Book, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. E., Pilbeam, D. R., and Wood, B. A. 1988. A probabilistic approach to the problem of sexual dimorphism in Homo habilis a comparison of KNM-ER 1470 and KNM-ER 1813.J. Human Evol. 17:503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1963 Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1969. The Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, Species and Evolution Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKitrick, M. C., and Zink, R. M. 1988. Species concepts in ornithology. Condor 90:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. A. 1991. Does brain size variability provide evidence of multiple species in Homo habilis?Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 84:385–398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., and Platnick, N. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C., and Wheeler, Q. D. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6:211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. 1985. The recognition concept of species, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speaation, pp. 21–29. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picq, P. G. 1990. L’Articulation Temporo-mandibulaire des Hominidés. CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rak, Y. 1983. The Australopitheane Face. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire, G. P. 1984. Comparison of Homo erectus from Africa and southeast Asia. Cour. Forsch-Inst. Senckenberg 69:83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire, G. P. 1990. The Evolution of Homo erectus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. T 1958. Cranial cresting patterns and their significance in the Hominoidea. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 16:397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. D-, and Brown, T. M. 1986. Gradual evolution and species discrimination in the fossil record, in: K. M. Flanagan and J. A. Lillegraven (ed.), Vertebrates, Phytogeny and Philosophy. Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, Special Paper3, pp. 119–130. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, T. 1987. Definition and diagnosis in the phylogenetic system. Syst. Zool. 36:208–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1961. The Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. H., and Paquette, S. P. 1989. The adaptive basis of Neandertal facial form, with some thoughts on the nature of modern human origins, in: E. Trinkaus (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans Biocultural Adaptations in the Later Pleistocene, pp. 181–210. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 1980. Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. Philos Sci. 47:350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Splitter, L. J. 1988. Species and identity. Philos. Sci 55:323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, C. B. 1984. The definition of Homo erectus and the existence of the species in Africa and Europe. Cour. Forsch-Inst. Senckenberg 69:131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, C. B. 1986 The credibility of Homo habilis, in: B. A Wood, L. B. Martin, and P. Andrews (eds.), Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 266–294. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester-Bradley, P. C. 1956. The new paleontology, in: P. C. Sylvester-Bradley (ed.), The Species Concept in Palaeontology, pp. 1–8. The Systematics Association, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F. S. 1989. Comment on “Human fossil history and evolutionary paradigms” by D. R. Pilbeam, in: M. K. Hecht (ed.), Evolutionary Biology at the Crossroads, pp. 145–148. Queens College Press, Flushing, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F. S., and Bock, W. J. 1991. Evolutionary theory and systematics: relationships between process and patterns. Z Zool. Evolut-Forsch 29:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. 1986. Species recognition in human paleontology.J. Hum. Evol. 15:165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. 1991 What was the Human Revolution? J. Hum. Evol. 20:77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, R. S. 1987. Geographic variation: a synthesis of cause, data, pattern, and congruence in relation to subspecies, multivariate analysis and phylogenesis. Boll Zool 54:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E. 1990. Cladistics and the hominid fossil record. Am. J. Phys Anthropol 83:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., and Chamberlain, A. 1989. Speciation, morphological change and the status of African Homo erectus. J Hum. Evol 18:115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. M. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S. 1985. Introductory comments on species and speciation, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. ix–xviii. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. C., and Leakey, R. E. 1978. The hominids of East Turkana. Sci. Am. 239:44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, R. C., Manega, P. C., Hay, R. L., Drake, R. E., and Curtis, G. H. 1991. Laser-fusion 40Ar/39Ar dating of Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 354:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenehcs Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1989. Kinds, individuals and theories, in: M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, pp. 289–300. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willman, R. 1989. Evolutionary or biological species? Abh. Natunuiss. Ver. Hamburg 28:95 – 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., and Brown, W. L. 1953. The subspecies concept and its taxonomic application. Syst. Zool 2:97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. A. 1984. The origin oi Homo erectus Cour. Forsch-Inst Senckenberg 69:99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. A. 1985. Early Homo in Kenya, and its systematic relationships, in: E. Delson (ed.), Ancestors. The Hard Evidence, pp. 206–214. Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, B. A., and Uytterschaut, H. 1987. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. III. Mandibular premolar crowns. J. Anat 154:121–156.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kimbel, W.H., Rak, Y. (1993). The Importance of Species Taxa in Paleoanthropology and an Argument for the Phylogenetic Concept of the Species Category. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (eds) Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3747-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3745-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics