Skip to main content

Factors Influencing Gripping Capacity of Chuck Jaws

  • Chapter

Summary

This paper presents the results of an extensive programme of research into the factors affecting the gripping capacity of chuck jaws. Various parameters were investigated and from the experimental results a computer program has been produced, enabling the rapid establishment of the parameters giving the ‘best’ grip situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thornley R H and Wilson B (1972) A review of some of the principles involved in chuck design Production Engineer, 51, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moiseev and Yu I (1981) How forces affect radial offset of parts set up in three jaw self aligning chucks Russian Eng. Journal, 60, 7, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuznetsov and Yu N (1981) Developments in collet-type clamping mechanisms Soviet Engineering Research, 1, 2, 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anon An objective comparison of the gripping pressure of the Pratt Garnet chuck (M-4976) and the Collet Mechanism SE-10682.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodchild N D (1982) A study of the dependence of the torque transmission capacity of chuck jaws on radial gripping force. B.Sc. Thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowden F R and Tabor D (1950) The Friction and Lubrication of Solids Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baker H J (1966) The applicability of flow pressure and hardness concepts in the estimation of workpiece retention and similar effects Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 6, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson B (1978) Workholding design philosophy and application Workholding and Toolholding for machine tools seminar. M.T.I.R.A.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kalajdzic M J and Soloja V B (1979) Rotational Speed Limits for basic types of chucks Annals of C.I.R.P. 297-301, January.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rajeswaren R (1966) A study of some aspects of workholding and positioning in relation to indention and flow pressure M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson D (1967) An investigation of idealised chuck jaw face form with relation to axial and tangential sliding M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cadwallder J and Pandy P C (1973) The relation between the radial gripping force and the Torque-Transmission capacity of chuck jaws M.T.I.R.A. research report No. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett A P (1983) A wedge indentation model for the grip of a chuck jaw 24th M.T.D.R. Conf., 355-360.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

P. F. McGoldrick

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Statham, A. (1986). Factors Influencing Gripping Capacity of Chuck Jaws. In: McGoldrick, P.F. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing Technology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1355-8_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1355-8_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1357-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1355-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics