Skip to main content

Concentrating Fruit Juices by Reverse Osmosis

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Polymer Science and Technology ((POLS,volume 13))

Abstract

The difference between reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration lies principally in the retention characteristics of the membranes. With respect to food processing, ultrafiltration membranes are able to retain protein-sized molecules, whereas reverse osmosis membranes retain lower molecular weight solutes such as sodium chloride or sucrose. In order to concentrate fruit juice, it is necessary to retain sugars, e.g., disaccharides such as sucrose (molecular weight 342, typically present in fruit juices as 5% of the total weight), and monosaccharides such as glucose and fructose (MW 180, also present in fruit juices at about 5% total weight). It is also necessary to retain organic acids such as citric acid (MW 192) or malic acid (134), typically present in fruit juices at the 1 to 2% level, and various salts present at less than half a percent. In addition, it is desirable to retain trace amounts of low molecular weight (<150) aroma compounds such as alcohols, esters, aldehydes, etc.; typically there might be 100 such compounds in a fruit juice with a total concentration of less than 400 parts per million.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • D. B. Hosaka, 1978, “Concentration of Tomato Juice and Serum by Reverse Osmosis,” M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Kavanagh, 1975, New Zealand J. of Dairy Sci. and Technol, 10: 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Matsuura, A. G. Baxter, and S. Sourirajan, 1973, Acta Alimentaria Academiae Scientarium Hungaricae, 2 (2): 109–150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Merson, and A. I. Morgan, 1968, Food Technol., 22:631– 634.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Paredes, 1980, “Orange Juice Concentration by Reverse Osmosis,” M.S. Thesis, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Riley, R. L. Fox, C. R. Lyons, C. E. Milstead, M. W. Serdy, and M. Tagami, 1976, Desalination, 19: 113–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S. G. Wyllie, S. Alves, M. Filsoof, and W. G. Jennings, 1978, Headspace sampling: use and abuse, pp. 1–15 in “Analysis of Foods and Beverages: Headspace Techniques,” G. Charalambous, ed., Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merson, R.L., Paredes, G., Hosaka, D.B. (1980). Concentrating Fruit Juices by Reverse Osmosis. In: Cooper, A.R. (eds) Ultrafiltration Membranes and Applications. Polymer Science and Technology, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3162-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3162-9_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-3164-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-3162-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics