Skip to main content

In Vivo Embryo Culture Device

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The INVO procedure using the INVOcell device is a simple technique of human assisted reproduction. The fertilization of the oocytes and the early development of the embryos occur in the INVOcell device placed into the vaginal cavity for an in vivo incubation. The vaginal cavity plays the role of the CO2 incubator by supplying the temperature and gas environment needed for the embryo development. Capital equipments found in a complex IVF laboratory are not necessary as gametes and embryos are not stored in the laboratory. The INVO procedure can be performed in a medical office setting. INVO is a proven technology that showed clinical pregnancy rates equivalent to conventional IVF when using a prototype. This chapter presents the preliminary results obtained in combining mild ovarian stimulation with INVO using the new designed INVOcell device. The low cost of the INVO procedure and its large availability allow the treatment of a significant portion of infertile couples in the world who could not access any reproductive technology before. The more natural in vivo conception of the embryos with the participation of the patients has generated more interest in INVO from the infertile population and specialized physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Taymor M, Ranoux C, Gross G. Natural oocyte retrieval with intravaginal fertilization: a simplified approach to in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:888–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ranoux C, Foulot H, Aubriot FX, Poirot C, Dubuisson JB, Chevallier O, Cardone V. A new in vitro fertilization technique: intravaginal culture. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:654–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frydman R, Ranoux C. INVO: a simple, low cost effective assisted reproductive technology. ESHRE Monographs, Special task force on ‘Developing countries and infertility’. Hum Reprod. 2008;163:85–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fukuda M, Fukuda K, Ranoux C. Unexpected low oxygen tension of intravaginal culture. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1293–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sterzik K, Rosenbusch B, Sasse V, Wolf A, Beier HM, Lauritzen C. A new variation of in vitro fertilization: intravaginal culture of human oocytes and cleavage stages. Hum Reprod Suppl. 1989;4(8 Suppl):83–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranoux C, Seibel MM. New techniques in fertilization: intravaginal culture and microvolume straw. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990;7:6–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freude G, Artner B, Leodolter S. Intravaginal culture—simplification of IVF. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1990;140:498–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiegerinck MAHM, Moret E, Van Dop PA, Wijnberg M, Beerendonk CDMB. Intra vaginal culture (IVC), the Eindhoven experience. In: Evers JHL, Heineman MJ, editors. Ovulation to implantation. Elsevier Science: BV; 1990. p. 349–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma S, Hewitt J. Intravaginal culture for IVF. Bombay Hosp J. 1993;35:155–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Batres F, Mahadevan M, Maris M, Miller M, Moutos D. Stimulated cycle and intravaginal culture fertilization in an office setting: a preliminary study. Poster presentation (P-196) at the annual meeting of ASRM, Cincinnati, OH; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rongieres-Bertrand C, Olivennes F, Righini C, Fanchin R, et al. Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:683–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee TH, Lin YH, Seow KM, et al. Effectiveness of cetrorelix for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surge during controlled ovarian stimulation using letrozole and gonadotropins: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:113–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Silva M, Reeves JJ. Indomethacin inhibition of ovulation in the cow. J Reprod Fertil. 1985;75:547–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nargund G, Waterstone J, Bland J. Cumulative conception and live birth rate in natural (unstimulated) IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:259–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Requina A, Herrero J, Landeras J, Navarro E, et al. Use of letrozole in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:571–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lucena E, Saa AM, Navarro DE, Lombana C, Moran A. Invo Procedure: minimally invasive IVF as an alternative treatment option for infertile couples. The Scientific World Journal. 2012; (in press).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quinn P. Use of coculture with cumulus cells in insemination medium in human in vitro fertilization (IVF). J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:270–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carrel DT, Peterson CM, Jones KP, Hatasaka HH, et al. A simplified coculture system using homologous, attached cumulus tissue results in improved human embryo morphology and pregnancy rates during in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:344–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ombelet W, Campo R, Bosmans E, Nijs M. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a first-line treatment in developing countries and methodological aspects that might influence IUI success. ESHRE Monographs, Special task force on ‘Developing countries and infertility’. Hum Reprod. 2008;2008(1):64–72. doi:10.1093/den,165:64-72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ombelet W, Nargund G. The patient from the developing world. In: Macklon NS, Greer IA, Steegers EAP, editors. Textbook of periconceptional medicine. London.: Informa Healthcare; 2009. p. 261–71.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ombelet W. False perceptions and common misunderstandings surrounding the subject of infertility in developing countries. Hum Reprod. ESHRE Monographs, Special task force on ‘Developing countries and infertility’. Hum Reprod. 2008;204:8–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Ranoux MD, MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ranoux, C. (2012). In Vivo Embryo Culture Device. In: Nagy, Z., Varghese, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Practical Manual of In Vitro Fertilization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1780-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1779-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1780-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics