Skip to main content

Equity-in-Quality: Towards a Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 500 Accesses

Chapter 2 dealt with the evolution of equity and quality issues in both education and mathematics education and came to the conclusion that equal access to quality education, which includes mathematics education, has become the focus of research and policy-making. Equity and quality are not only research issues which cut across different disciplines but are conceived as major determinants of socioeconomic and human development in both industrial and developing countries, as evidenced by the annual reports of the United Nations Development Program(UNDP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atweh, B., Forgas, H., & Nebres, B. (Eds.). (2001). Socio-cultural research on mathematics education-An international perspective. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne, R., & L. Stiefel. (1984). The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological, and empirical dimensions. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. (Ed.). (2003). Which way social justice in mathematics education? Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, I. (2007). Some tensions in mathematics education for democracy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, http://www.montanamath.org/TMME Monograph 1, 49–62.

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspctives on activity theory (pp. 19–38), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E., & Luque, J. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics Education Review, 22, 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurdak, M., & Shahin I. (1999). An ethnographic study of the computational strategies of a group of young street vendors in Beirut. Educational Studies in Mathematics Education, 40, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurdak, M. (2006). Impact of student, teacher, school factors on achievement in mathematics and science based on TIMSS 2003 Arab Countries Data. Beirut: UNESCO Regional Office in Beirut (130 pages), (limited distribution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). New York: M. E. Sharpe, Armonk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, A. (2007). Mathematical marginalisation and meritocracy: Inequity in an English classroom. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 1, 35–48 http://www.montanamath.org/TMME

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PISA. (2005). School factors related to quality and equity: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secada, W., Fennema, E., & Byrd-Adajian, L. (1995). New directions for equity in mathematics education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2007). 0n the origins of social justice: Darwin, Freire, Marx and Vivekananda. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 1, 1–6 http://www.montanamath.org/TMME

  • UNESCO. (2005). Education for all-the quality imperative, summary. Paris: UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P., & Zeverbergen, R.(Eds.). (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinchenko V. P., & Gordon V. M. (1981). Methodological problems in analyzing activity’, In Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). NY: M.E. Sharpe, Armonk.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Jurdak .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag US

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jurdak, M. (2009). Equity-in-Quality: Towards a Theoretical Framework. In: Toward Equity in Quality in Mathematics Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0558-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics