Skip to main content

The Making of a Participatory Action Researcher

  • Chapter
Doing Psychology Critically

Abstract

The type of research that we advocate in this chapter is not focused on the creation of ‘knowledge for knowledge’s sake’. We believe that research that claims to be value-neutral and objective runs the risk of reinforcing the societal status quo (Prilleltensky, 1994). Rather, we are concerned with research that advances knowledge that helps to create social change for the benefit of marginalized people (Kirby and McKenna, 1989; Nelson, Ochocka et al., 1998). People who are poor and disempowered are rarely the beneficiaries of research. That is to say, research is done ‘on’ disadvantaged people, not ‘with them’. Research should benefit not just researchers, but also those who remain silent through the process of research priority-setting. In this chapter, we begin with a description of research that reflects the values and concepts of the critical psychology approach that we set forth in Part I. Next, we describe how to conduct such research. We end the chapter with a discussion of training strategies for this type of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 Isaac Prilleltensky and Geoffrey Nelson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prilleltensky, I., Nelson, G. (2002). The Making of a Participatory Action Researcher. In: Doing Psychology Critically. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1462-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics