Conceptual design is a vital part of the design process during which designers first envision new ideas and then synthesize them into physical configurations that meet certain design specifications. In this research, a suite of computational tools is developed that assists the designers perform this non-trivial task of navigating the design space for creating conceptual design solutions. The methodology is based on automating the function-based synthesis paradigm by combining various computational methods. Accordingly, three nested search algorithms are developed and integrated that mimic a designer's decision-making at various stages of conceptual design. The implemented system provides a method for automatically generating novel alternative solutions to real design problems. The application of the approach to the design of an electromechanical device shows the method's range of capabilities, and how it serves as a comparison to human conceptual design generation and as a tool suite to complement the skills of a designer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pahl G, W Beitz (1996) “Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach,” Springer Verlag.
Mittal S, Dym C, Morjara M (1985) “PRIDE: An Expert System for the Design of Paper Handling Systems”, IEEE Computer, Vol.19:7, pp. 102–114. 22.
Qian L., Gero JS, (1996) “Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design”, AIEDAM Vol. 10, pp. 289–312.
Bhatta S, Goel A, Prabhakar S (1994) “Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model-Based Approach,” Proceedings of the AI in Design, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 57–74.
Hundal M (1990) “A Systematic Method for Developing Function Structures, Solutions and Concept Variants,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25:3, pp.243–256.
Ward AC, WP Seering, (1989) “The performance of a mechanical design compiler”, ASME, Design Engineering Vol 17, pp. 89–97.
Bracewell RH, Sharpe JEE (1996) “Functional Description Used in Computer Support for Qualitative Scheme Generation- “Schemebuilder ”, Artificial I n-telligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 10:4, pp. 333–345.
Chakrabarti A, Bligh T (1996) “An Approach to Functional Synthesis of Mechanical Design Concepts: Theory, Applications and Emerging Research Issues,” AIEDAM, 10, pp.313–331.
Campbell M, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2000) “Agent-based Synthesis of ElectroMechanical Design Configurations”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 122:1, pp. 61–69.
Wang K, Yan J, (2002) “An Analytical Approach to Functional Design,” Proceedings of ASME 2002 DETC, Montreal, CA.
Sridharan P, MI Campbell (2005)A Study on the Grammatical Construction of Function Structures. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing,. 19(3): p. 139–160.
Agarwal M, J Cagan (1998) “A Blend of Different Tastes: The Language of Coffee Makers”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 205–226.
Shea, K., J. Cagan, and S.J. Fenves, 1997, “A Shape Annealing Approach to Optimal Truss Design with Dynamic Grouping of Members”, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol 119, No. 3, pp. 388–394.
Brown, K.N., and J. Cagan, 1997, “Optimized Process Planning by Generative Simulated Annealing”, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 11, pp.219–235.
Schmidt L, Cagan J (1995) “Recursive Annealing: A Computational Model for Machine Design”, Research in Engineering Design, 7:2, pp. 102–125.
Starling AC, K Shea (2003) “A Grammatical Approach to Computational Generation of Mechanical Clock Designs”, Proceedings of ICED 03 International Conference on Engineering Design. Stockholm, Sweden.
Starling AC, K. Shea (2005) “Virtual Synthesizers for Mechanical Gear Systems,” Proceedings of ICED 05 International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia.
Wielinga BJ, Schreiber AT (1997) “Configuration Design Problem Solving” Technical Report University of Amsterdam, Department of Social Science Informatics.
Carlson-Skalak S, White MD, Teng Y (1998) “Using an Evolutionary Algorithm for Catalog Design”, Research in Engineering Design
Campbell MI, (2007) The official GraphSynth Site,http://www.graphsynth. com,University of Texas at Austin
Carlson SE (1996) “Genetic Algorithm Attributes for Component Selection”, Research in Engineering Design
Kurtoglu T, MI Campbell (2008) “Automated Synthesis of Electromechancial Design Configurations from Empirical Analysis of Function to Form Mapping,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 19, available online.
Tamhankar MS, MI Campbell (2007) “An Intelligent and Efficient Tree Search Algorithm for Computer-Aided Component Selection”. ASME DETC07/DAC-34587, Las Vegas.
Design Repository, Design Engineering Lab, University of Missouri Rolla
McMaster-Carr®, McMaster-Carr Supply Company,www.mcmaster.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kurtoglu, T., Swantner, A., Campbell, M.I. (2008). Automating the Conceptual Design Process: From Black-box to Component Selection. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)