Abstract
This chapter offers a theoretical discussion of the relationship between educational reforms and learning in the Asia-Pacific region. Several reasons are discussed explaining why it is difficult to ascertain the linkage between educational reforms and learning. A consistent theoretical framework is needed to guide the discussion. The chapter argues that Activity Theory is a potential candidate. We discuss how educational reforms are understood from this specific perspective. Two conceptual linkages between educational reforms and learning are discussed. The chapter ends with a discussion of four critical lenses integral to an activity theory perspective that help exploring the linkage between reform and learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barab, S., Schatz, S. & Scheckler, R. (2004). Using activity theory to conceptualise online community and using online community to conceptualise activity theory. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 11(1), 25–47.
Cheng, Y. C. (2003). Trends in educational reform in the Asia-Pacific region. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Cheng, Y. C., Chow, K. W. & Tsui, K. T. (Eds.) (2001). New Teacher Education for the Future: International Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education & Kluwer Academic.
Cheng, Y. C. & Townsend, T. (2000). Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational Change and Development in Asia-Pacific Region: Challenges for the Future (pp. 317–344). The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publisher.
Cole, M. (1998). Can cultural psychology help us think about diversity?. Mind, Culture & Activity, 5(4), 291–304.
Cole, M., Engeström, Y. & Vasquez, O. A. (Eds.) (1997). Mind, Culture and Activity: Seminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, D. & Wilson, B. (1995). Make a difference with, not for, students: A plea to researchers and reformers. Educational Researcher, 24(June/July), 12–17.
Creemers, B. & van der Werf, G. (2000). Economic viewpoints in educational effectiveness: Cost-effectiveness analysis of an educational improvement project. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 11(3), 361–384.
Daniel, H. & Cole, T. (2002). The development of provision for young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties: An activity theory analysis. Oxford Review of Education, 28 (2 & 3), 311–329.
Education Commission (2000). Learning for Life, Learning Through Life: Reform Proposals for the Education System in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Elmore, R. F. (1995). Structural reform and educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 23–26.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity Theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity Theory as a framework for analysing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisa-tion. Journal of Education & Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. London: Cassell.
Green, A. (1999). Education and globalisation in Europe and East Asia: Convergent and divergent trends. Journal of Educational Policy, 14(1), 55–71.
Hallinger, P., & Kantamara, P. (2001). Exploring the cultural context of school improvement in Thailand. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 12(4), 385–408.
Harker, R., & Tymms, P. (2004). The effects of student composition on school outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 15(2), 177–199.
Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Using technology in higher education: An Activity Theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 77–83.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity Theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 17–44). MA: MIT Press.
Law, W. W. (2003). Globalization as both threat and opportunity for the Hong Kong teaching profession. Journal of Educational Change, 4(2), 149–179.
Law, W. W. (2004). Translating globalization and democratization into local policy: Educational reform in Hong Kong and Taiwan. International Review of Education, 50(5–6), 497524.
Lee, M. N. N. (1999). Education in Malaysia: Towards Vision 2020. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 10(1), 86–98.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Levin, B. (2001). Reforming Education: From Origins to Outcomes. New York: Routledge/Falmer.
Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2004). An activity-theoretical approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools: Orienting activities and learner autonomy. Computers & Education, 43, 215–236.
Lo, L. N. K. (1999). Raising funds and raising quality for schools in China. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 10(1), 31–54.
Luke, A., & Hogan, D. (2006). Redesigning what counts as evidence in educational policy: The Singapore model. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2006: Education Research and Policy: Steering the Knowledge-based Economy (pp. 170–184). New York: Routledge.
Maclean, R. (2001). Educational change in Asia: An Overview. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 189–192.
Maclean, R. (2002). Secondary education reform and educational research in the Asia-Pacific region. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 1, 79–98.
Morris, P. (2002). Promoting curriculum reforms in the context of a political transition: An analysis of Hong Kong's experience. Journal of Education Policy, 17(1), 13–28.
Morris, P. & Scott, I. (2003). Educational reforms and policy implementation in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 18(1), 71–84.
Roth, W.-M. (2004). Activity Theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 11(1), 1–8.
Tan, C. & Ng, P. T. (2007). Dynamics of change: Decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Educational Change, 8(2), 155–168.
Queensland College of Teachers (2006). Professional Standards for Queensland Teachers. Brisbane: Queensland College of Teachers.
Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S. & Reynolds, D. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research (pp. 160–186). London: Falmer Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (Eds.). (2002). Learning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education. London: Blackwell.
Yu, H. (2005). Implementation of school-based management in Hong Kong: Recent development and future challenges. Journal of Educational Change, 6(3), 253–275.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ng, CH. (2009). Exploring the Linkage Between Reforms and Learning in the Asia-Pacific Region: An Activity Theory Perspective. In: Ng, Ch., Renshaw, P.D. (eds) Reforming Learning. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3024-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3024-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3002-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3024-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)