Skip to main content

The Functions of Social Choice Theory

  • Chapter
Social Choice Re-examined

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

Social choice theory was intended to provide a rational framework for decisions that, for whatever reason, have to be made collectively. The paradigmatic example was election of officials, but this was intended only to exemplify the issue. Indeed, the real purpose was to analyze policy decisions. A candidate was thought of primarily as an embodiment of policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black, D. (1963) The Theory of Committees and Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda, J.-C. de (1781) ‘Mémoire sur les Elections au Scrutin’, Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, pp. 657–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • English translation de Grazia, A. (1953) ‘Mathematical Derivation of an Election System’, Isis, vol. 44, pp. 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, Marquis de (Caritat, J. A. N.) (1785) Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix (Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuit, J. (1844) ‘De la mesure de l’utilité des travaux publics’, Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, 2e Série, vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • English translation Barbach, R. H. (1952) ‘On the Measurement of the Utility of Public Works’, International Economic Papers, vol. 2, pp. 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, F. (1982) ‘Ways of Criticizing the Court’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 95, pp. 802–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, K. O. (1952) ‘A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision’, Econometrica, vol. 20, pp. 680–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1981) The Economics of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1958) ‘The Paradox of Voting and the Congressional Rules for Voting on Amendments’, American Political Science Review, vol. 52, pp. 349–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. (1941) ‘A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 9, pp. 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, M. L. (1994) ‘The Misguided Renaissance of Social Choice’, Yale Law Review, vol. 103, pp. 1219–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1997 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arrow, K.J. (1997). The Functions of Social Choice Theory. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A., Suzumura, K. (eds) Social Choice Re-examined. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25849-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics