Abstract
The mass demonstrations which culminated in Roh Tae Woo’s Democratic Declaration of 29 June 1987 put an end to 26 years of military-based authoritarian rule. During the summer of 1987, South Korea (hereinafter Korea) appeared to be on the brink of major political and economic upheaval. Democratisation triggered off an unprecedented wave of labour unrest and a united democratic opposition seemed destined for victory in the forthcoming December presidential elections. Instead, the opposition fragmented and lost allowing Roh to hang on to power. The ruling party of the authoritarian era eventually merged with two of the opposition parties. In economic development, there was a continuation of the policy of gradual opening first initiated in the early 1980s. The aftermath of Korean democratisation contrasted sharply with the leadership and economic changes that followed the democratisation of Latin America and Eastern Europe in the 1980s. This article will explain why post-democratisation Korea followed a more graduated path of political and economic reform paying particular attention to the legacy of authoritarian industrialisation. It will then go on to assess the impact of societal activation on the economic policy agenda and the potential for Korea to combine a democratic polity with market-conforming intervention on the postwar Japanese pattern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For example, see Alice Amsden, Asia’s Next Giant. South Korea and Late-Industrialization (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).
Robert Wade, Governing the Market (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990) whilst focusing on Taiwan also identifies Korea as a ‘governed market’ political economy of a similar type.
Won-mo Dong, ‘The Democrat-isation of South Korea: What Role does the Middle Class Play?’ in James Cotton (ed.), Korea under Roh Tae Woo (Sydney: George Allen and Unwin, 1993) pp. 74–91.
James Cotton, ‘From Authoritarianism to Democracy in South Korea’ in Political Studies 37 (1989) applies the modernisationist argument to the Korean case.
Gary Wynia, The Politics of Latin American Development (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1984) pp. 57–8;
Guillermo O’Donnell and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986) pp. 51–2.
See Dae Jung Kim, Mass Participatory Economy: A Democratic Alternative for Korea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University-University Press of America, 1985).
Hak-kyu Sohn, Authoritarianism and Opposition in South Korea (London: Routledge, 1989) pp. 132–6 notes the support for labour reform by tradtitionally conservative civic and religious leaders by 1977.
Asia Monitor Resource Centre, ‘Min-ju No-jo: South Korea’s New Trades Unions’ in Asia Labour Monitor (Hong Kong: AMRC, 1987) pp. 63–5.
The Daewoo Motor strike of 1985 demonstrated the militancy of skilled blue-collar workers when it came to wage demands. Asia Watch Committee, Human Rights in Korea (Washington DC: Asia Watch Report, 1986) pp. 258–9.
Chi Ha Kim, Cry of the People and Other Poems (Hayama: Autumn Press, 1974).
Jung En Woo, Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialisation (New York: Columbia University Press: 1991) pp. 198–200.
Roh Tae Woo, ‘Joint Declaration on Creating a New Era: Launching a New National Political Party’ (Speech 22 January 1990) in Roh Tae Woo, Korea: A Nation Transformed. Selected Speeches (Oxford: Pergamon, 1990) pp. 171–5.
Bruce Cumings, ‘The Abortive Abertura: South Korea in the Light of Latin American Experience’ in New Left Review 173 (1989) p. 25.
The following section draws from my discussion ‘From Relative Autonomy to Consensual Development: The Case of South Korea’ in Political Studies, 43 (December 1995).
Eric A. Nordlinger, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981) argues that public officials can successfully diverge from societal preferences even in well established liberal democracies (US, Britain, Scandinavia).
Government of the Republic of Korea, Summary Draft of the Fifth Five Year Economic and Social Development Plan (Seoul: Economic Planning Board, 1981).
Alice H. Amsden and Yoon-Dae Euh, ‘Republic of Korea’s Financial Reform: What are the Lessons?’, UNCTAD Discussion Paper 30 (April 1990) pp. 13–14.
For example, Nam Duck Woo, ‘Economic Response to Globalisation Challenge’ in The Korea Economic Daily (4 January 1995) argued excessive bureaucratic impetus and concern with market failure were holding back liberalisation. Such a statement was particularly significant in view of Nam having been once closely identified with President Park’s interventionist policies.
Kap-Yun Lee, ‘Democratisation, Party Failure, and the Emergence of the Unification National Party’ in Korea and World Affairs, 18 (1994) pp. 749–71 attributes the rise and decline of the UNP to personality and popular protest against the incompetence of ruling politicians.
George E. Ogle, South Korea: Dissent within the Economic Miracle (London: Zed Books, 1990).
Mario F. Bognanno, ‘Korea’s Industrial Relations at Turning Point’ KDI Working Paper 8816 (Seoul: Korea Development Institute, 1988) pp. 33–4, 75–82.
Keun Lee and Chung H. Lee, ‘Sustaining Economic Development in South Korea: Lessons from Japan’ in The Pacific Review, 5 (1992) pp. 20–2.
Presidential Commission on Economic Restructuring, Realigning National Priorities (Seoul: 1988) pp. 101–48.
For the seminal work on state/business relations in postwar Japan, see Chalmers Johnson, MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982).
On Japan see T. J. Pempel and Keiichi Tsunekawa, ‘Corporatism without Labour: The Japanese Anomaly’ in Philippe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (eds), Trends towards Corporatist Intermediation (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979) and
Karel van Wolferen, The Enigma of Japanese Power (London: Macmillan, 1989).
Donald S. MacDonald, ‘South Korea’s Politics since Liberation’ in Donald N. Clark (ed.), Korea Briefing 1993 (Boulder, CI: Westview, 1993) pp. 17–18.
Frederic C. Deyo (ed), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1987).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kong, T.Y. (1997). Democratisation and its Aftermath: Transition and Continuity in South Korea. In: Kim, D.H., Kong, T.Y. (eds) The Korean Peninsula in Transition. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25141-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25141-4_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25143-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25141-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)