Abstract
French social theory has long been fashionable, if not dominant, on the academic left in anglophone countries. In the mid 1970s, for example, Althusserian Marxism and Lacanian psychoanalysis came close to defining the range of options open to radical social theory in Britain. Since the demise of these orthodoxies, attention has come to focus on the work of a diverse group of writers which includes Baudrillard, Deleuze, Foucault, Lyotard and their epigones. These writers would all (more or less) reject Marxist models of radical theory and practice, but would all (more or less) claim credentials as radical theorists. Indeed, each makes a strong claim that a wholly new kind of radical theory is now required, a claim which draws on a diffused but potent belief that massive historical shifts and dislocations are underway in culture and society. Whitebook’s reaction to these ‘postmodernist’ themes captures the fin de siècle atmosphere. ‘While the announcement that Minerva’s owl is about to depart may be premature, one is increasingly struck by the sense of living in the closing of an epoch’ (Whitebook, 1982, p. 53).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
ADORNO, T. (1973), Negative Dialectics, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
ATKINSON, J. M. and HERITAGE, J. (eds) (1984), Structures of Social Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BAUDRILLARD, J. (1980), ‘Forgetting Foucault’, Humanities in Society, 3.1, pp. 87–111.
BAUDRILLARD, J. (1983), In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, New York, Semiotext(e).
BAUDRILLARD, J. (1983a), ‘The Ecstasy of Communication’, in Foster (ed.), op. cit.
BAUMAN, Z. (1987), Legislators and Interpreters, Cambridge, Polity Press.
BELL, D. (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York, Basic Books.
BERNSTEIN, J. (ed.) (1985), Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.
BLUM, A. (1974), Theorizing, London, Heinemann.
BLUMENBERG, H. (1983), The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
BUTLER, C. (1980), After the Wake, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CALLINICOS, A. (1982), Is There a Future for Marxism?, London, Macmillan.
CUTLER, A. et al. (1978), Marx’s ‘Capital’ and Capitalism Today, Volume 2, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
DURKHEIM, E. (1964), The Rules of Sociological Method, New York, Free Press.
EAGLETON, T. (1985), ‘Capitalism, Modernism and Postmodernism’, New Left Review, 152, pp. 60–73.
FOSTER, H. (1983), ‘Post-Modernism: a Preface’, in Foster (ed.), op. cit.
FOSTER, H. (ed.) (1983), The Anti-Aesthetic, Port Townsend, Bay Press.
FOUCAULT, M. (1970), The Order of Things, London, Tavistock.
FOUCAULT, M. (1984), ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Rabinow (ed.), op. cit.
GIDDENS, A. (1982), Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, London, Macmillan.
GILBERT, N. and MULKAY, M. (1984), Opening Pandora’s Box, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
GLUCKSMANN, A. (1980), The Master Thinkers, Brighton, The Harvester Press.
GOULDNER, A. (1976), The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology, London, Macmillan.
GUATTARI, F. (1984), Molecular Revolution, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
HABERMAS, J. (1979), Communication and the Evolution of Society, London, Heinemann.
HABERMAS, J. (1981), ‘Modernity versus Postmodernity’, New German Critique, 22, pp. 3–14.
HABERMAS, J. (1982), ‘A Reply to My Critics’ in Thompson & Held (eds), op. cit.
HABERMAS, J. (1984), Reason and the Rationalization of Society, London, Heinemann.
HABERMAS, J. (1985), ‘Neoconservative Cultural Criticism: etc’, in Bernstein (ed.), op. cit.
HABERMAS, J. (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.
HAMLYN, D. (1970), The Theory of Knowledge, London, Macmillan.
HASSAN, I. (1985), ‘The Culture of Post Modernism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 2.3, pp. 119–31.
HINDESS, B. (1977), Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences, Brighton, Harvester Press.
HINDESS, B. and HIRST, P. (1977), Mode of Production and Social Formation, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
HIRST, P. (1979), On Law and Ideology, London, Macmillan.
HONNETH, A. (1985), ‘An Aversion against the Universal: etc’, Theory, Culture & Society, 2.3, pp. 147–56.
HUYSSEN, A. (1984), ‘From Counter Culture to Neo-Conservatism and Beyond: Stages of the Post Modern’, Social Science Information, 23, pp. 147–56.
JAMESON, F. (1983), ‘Post-Modernism and Consumer Society’, in Foster (ed.), op. cit.
JAMESON, F. (1984), ‘Post-Modernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism’, New Left Review, 146, pp. 53–92.
KANT, I. (1952), The Critique of Judgement, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
KILMINSTER, R. (1982), ‘Theory and Practice in Marx and Marxism’, in Parkinson (ed.), op. cit.
KNORR-CETINA, K. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
KROKER, A. (1985), ‘Baudrillard’s Marx’, Theory, Culture & Society, 2.3, pp. 69–83.
LASH, S. (1985), ‘Postmodernity and Desire’, Theory & Society, 14, pp. 1–33.
LYOTARD, J.-F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
LYOTARD, J.-F. (1984a), ‘Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism’ in Lyotard (1984), op. cit.
MARGOLIS, J. (1986), Pragmatism Without Foundations, Oxford, Blackwell.
MARX, K. (1973), Grundrisse, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
MARX, K. (1975), Early Writings, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
MULKAY, M. (1985), The Word and the World, London, Allen & Unwin.
MULKAY, M., ASHMORE, M. and PINCH, T. (1987), ‘Measuring the Quality of Life: etc’, Sociology, 21, pp. 541–64.
O’NEILL, J. (1972), Sociology as a Skin Trade, London, Heinemann.
O’NEILL, J. (1986), ‘Sociological Nemesis: Parsons and Foucault on the Theraputic Disciplines’, in Wardell and Turner (eds), op. cit.
O’NEILL, J. (1986a), ‘The Disciplinary Society: from Weber to Foucault’, British Journal of Sociology, 37, pp. 42–60.
PARKINSON, G. (ed.) (1982), Marx and Marxisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
RABINOW, P. (ed.) (1984), The Foucault Reader, New York, Random House.
RORTY, R. (1982), The Consequences of Pragmatism, Brighton, Harvester Press.
ROSE, G. (1984), Dialectic of Nihilism, Oxford, Blackwell.
ROSEN, S. (1969), Nihilism, New Haven, Yale University Press.
RYAN, M. (1982), Marxism and Deconstruction, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
SANDYWELL, B., et al. (1975), Problems of Reflexivity and Dialectic in Sociology, London, Rouledge & Kegan Paul.
SMART, B. (1983), Foucault, Marxism and Critique, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
THOMPSON, J. and HELD, D. (eds) (1982), Habermas: Critical Debates, London, Macmillan.
TOURAINE, A. (1971), The Post-Industrial Society, New York, Random House.
WARDELL, M. and TURNER, S. (eds) (1986), Sociological Theory in Transition, Boston, Allen & Unwin.
WHITEBOOK, J. (1982), ‘Saving the Subject: etc.’, Telos, 50, pp. 79–102.
WOOLGAR, S. (ed.) (1987), Knowledge and Reflexivity, London, Sage.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1990 Stephen Crook
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crook, S. (1990). The End of Radical Social Theory? Radicalism, Modernism and Postmodernism. In: Boyne, R., Rattansi, A. (eds) Postmodernism and Society. Communications and Culture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20843-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20843-2_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-47511-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20843-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)