Skip to main content

Object Choices: Taste and Fetishism in Flaubert’s L’Education sentimentale

  • Chapter
  • 37 Accesses

Part of the book series: Warwick Studies in the European Humanities ((WSEH))

Abstract

My title is a loose play on words since ‘object’ choice in psychoanalytic discourse refers to the grammatical sense of object and has nothing to do with material things. Yet erotic choices in Flaubert are invariably mediated or accompanied by the investment of affect in material objects connected with the loved person, and critics have variously explored the function of fetishism in the construction of characters’ psychologies, and in motivating the presence of movement of objects in the novels.1 Fetishism is here used partly in the fairly unspecified sense of a Bachelardian emotional investment in objects, exploited by a descriptive writer for symbolic or generally poetic potential.2 But it is also used in the explicitly Freudian sense of a neurotic structure — the elevation of part of the body or an item of clothing to the status of magic substitute for the maternal phallus. For the split fetishising subject, the absence of the phallus is at once acknowledged and denied in its attempt to ward off the castration anxiety supposedly entailed in a male recognition of sexual difference.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example: Charles Bernheimer, ‘Fetishism and Allegory in Bouvard et Pécuchet’, in Naomi Schor and Henry F. Majewski (eds), Flaubert and Postmodernism (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984) pp. 160–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pierre Danger, Sensations et objets dans le roman de Flaubert (Paris: Armand Colin, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jean-Pierre Duquette, Flaubert ou L’Architecture du vide (Montreal: Les Presse de l’Université de Montréal, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stirling Haig, ‘Madame Arnoux’s “Coffret”: A Monumental Case’, Romanic Review, 75 (1984) pp. 469–82

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diana Knight, Flaubert’s Characters: The Language of Illusion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Naomi Schor, ‘Fetishism and its Ironies’, Nineteenth-century French Studies,17 (Fall-Winter 1988–9) pp. 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. A. Williams, The Hidden Life at its Source: A Study of Flaubert’s ‘L’Education sentimentale’ (Hull: Hull University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For example, Gaston Bachelard, La Poétique de l’espace (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sigmund Freud, ‘Fetishism’ (1927), in On Sexuality: ‘Three Essays on the Theory of Sexualityand Other Works, ed. Angela Richards, tr. James Strachey, Pelican Freud Library, vol. 7 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977) pp. 345–57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I have found the following articles on Freudian fetishism in nineteenth-century French literature particularly helpful: Peter Brooks, ‘Le corps-récit, ou Nana enfin dévoilée’, Romantisme, 63 (1989) pp. 66–86;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Naomi Schor, ‘Female Fetishism: The Case of George Sand’, Poetics Today, 6,1–2 (1985) pp. 301–10, and ‘Salammbô Bound’, in Breaking the Chain: Women, Theory, and French Realist Fiction (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985) pp. 111–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ideological approaches to the role of objects in Flaubert have tended to focus on Madame Bovary rather than L’Education sentimentale, for example: Edward J. Ahearn, The Magic Cigar Case: Emma Bovary and Karl Marx’, in Michel Guggenheim (ed.), Women in French Litera-ture (Saratoga: Anma Libri, 1988) pp. 181–8;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Claude Duchet, ‘Romans et objets: l’exemple de Madame Bovariy’, Europe, 485–7 (1969) pp. 172–201;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michel Picard, ‘La prodigalité d’Emma Bovary’. Littérature, 3 (1973) pp. 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walter Benjamin, Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism, tr. Harry Zohn (London: Verso, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. For example Jeanne Bem, ‘Flaubert et Oedipe’, chapter 2 of Désir et savoir dans l’ceuvre de Flaubert: Etude de ‘La Tentation de Saint Antoine’ (Neuchâtel: Editions de la Baconnière, 1979) pp. 26–46.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A particularly full and persuasive account is provided in D. A. Williams, ‘Sacred and Profane in L’Education sentimentale’, Modern Language Review, 73 (1978) pp. 786–98.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freud, ‘Representation by Symbols in Dreams — Some Further Typical Dreams’, in The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), ed. Angela Richards, tr. James Strachey, Pelican Freud Library, vol. 4 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976) pp. 466–529.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I am thinking of ‘Le séminaire sur “La lettre volée” ‘, in Jacques Lacan, Ecrits I (Paris: Seuil, ‘Points’, 1970 pp. 19–75, where Lacan draws a metaphorical link between the female anatomy and the purloined letter conspicuously dangling from the mantelpiece (p. 47).

    Google Scholar 

  20. On this see again Schor, ‘Femâle Fetishism’, op. cit., and Sarah Kofman, L’Enigme de la femme: la Femme dans les textes de Freud (Paris: Galilée, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction, tr. Richard Nice (London: Routledge, 1984). The quotations that follow are from pp. 175, 241, 243 and 372 respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bourdieu, ‘L’Invention de la vie d’artiste’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 2 (March 1975) pp. 67–93, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See too Bourdieu, ‘Flaubert’s Point of View’, Critical Inquiry, 14 (Spring 1988) pp. 539–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1993 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knight, D. (1993). Object Choices: Taste and Fetishism in Flaubert’s L’Education sentimentale. In: Rigby, B. (eds) French Literature, Thought and Culture in the Nineteenth Century. Warwick Studies in the European Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11824-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics