Skip to main content

A General Psychology of Intergroup Relations

  • Chapter
Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”
  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

For the sake of continuity with the immediately preceding chapters I shall assume, as did Marx himself at many points in his writing, the existence of a mode of production, such as capitalism, which has been in existence long enough that traditional groupings from previous social formations have been largely broken down, but not long enough that the majority of producers have organized themselves as a group/ “class-for-itself”. However, conceiving of individuals as chickens and groups as eggs is only an analytical device. Groups are also chickens. Indeed, as we saw in Chapter 1, for Marx the most primeval chickens — and those most important for historic change — are groups rather than individuals, and on numerous occasions we shall have to acknowledge this fact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The interpretation of Marx on ideology employed here is closer to Bhikha Parekh’s (Marx’s Theory of Ideology (London: Croom Helm, 1982))

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Joe McCarney’s (The Real World of Ideology (Sussex/N.J.: Harvester/Humanities Press, 1980)) than to Althusser’s (“Ideology … ,” op. cit.).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See George Lichtheim, Marxism: An historical and critical study (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961) pp. 187–90,

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Geoffrey Kay, The Economic Theory of The Working Class (London: Macmillan, 1979) pp. 44–53, 72–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For one critique of this conception, see Hillel Ticktin’s “The contradictions of Soviet society and Professor Bettleheim” Critique, 1976, No. 6 (Spring), pp. 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On the other hand, there is some evidence that individuals who have coercive power over others (for example, fathers in families) have less insight into those they rule than the latter have into the ruler (for example, see Darwin Thomas, David Franks and Janet Colonico, “Role-taking and power in social psychology” American Sociological Review, vol. 37 (October 1972), pp. 605–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrington Moore is a case in point. See his Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt (White Plains, N.Y.: Sharpe, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen Wood argues this point forcefully in his “The Marxian critique of justice” pp. 3–41 in Marshall Cohen, Thomas Nagel and Thomas Scanlon (eds), Marx, Justice and History (Princeton University Press, 1980) pp. 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James H. Davis has reviewed this literature in Group Performance (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969) Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On the effects of anonymity and “diffusion of responsibility” see, for example, Leon Festinger, A. Pepitone and T. M. Newcomb, “Some consequences of deindividuation in a group” (Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 47 (1952) pp. 382–9.),

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. and Bibb Latané and John Darley, The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. H. Mowrer, Learning Theory and Behavior (New York: Wiley, 1960).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Although Martin Seligman does not use the term, parts of his analysis of Helplessness (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975. E.g., pp. 37–40.) appear to rely upon this process.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See David Gold, Clarence Lo and Erik Olin Wright, “Recent developments in Marxist theories of the capitalist state” Monthly Review, vol. 27 (October, November 1975) pp. 29–43; 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. For reviews of later developments in these debates see Robert Jessop’s The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  16. and Martin Carnoy’s The State and Political Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. For a secondary account, see Henry Collins and Chimen Abramsky, Karl Marx and the British Labour Movement (London: Macmillan, 1965) Chapter 13, and pp. 298–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 W. Peter Archibald

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Archibald, W.P. (1989). A General Psychology of Intergroup Relations. In: Marx and the Missing Link: “Human Nature”. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09184-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics