Abstract
Hardy came of artistic age with The Return of the Native, and by this sixth novel had thoroughly learned the technique of allusion. But a study of Hardy would seem incomplete without some investigation of the final results of the long process of stylistic honing, without a look at his two final great novels, Tess of the d’Urbervilles and Jude the Obscure.1 By The Return, most key character traits were in place, and he continually intensified them: Eustacia’s sexuality becomes Tess’s passion; Thomasin’s virginity, Sue’s frigidity; Wildeve’s propositions, Alec’s rape; Clym’s asexuality, Angel’s devastating priggishness; and Jude’s dual nature has remnants of both Wildeve and Clym. Technique still complements content, as Hardy allusively elevates his prose, dignifies his plots, and undermines his characters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
J. T. Laird, The Shaping of ‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles’ (London, 1975). See especially 190 ff. See also Mary Jacobus, ‘Tess’s Purity’, E1C, xxvi (October 1976) 318–38.
Florence Emily Hardy, The Life of Thomas Hardy: 1840–1928 (London, 1962) p. 240.
W. R. Rutland, Thomas Hardy: A Study of his Writings and their Background (Oxford, 1938) p. 240.
Roy Morrell, Thomas Hardy: The Will and the Way (Singapore, 1965) p. 32.
See Philip Mahone Griffith, ‘The Image of the Trapped Animal in Hardy’s Tess of the d’Urbervilles’, TSE mu (1963) 88.
Irving Howe, Thomas Hardy (London, 1967) p. 112.
See Benjamin Sankey, The Major Novels of Thomas Hardy (Denver, 1965) p. 51.
Dorothy Van Ghent, The English Novel: Form and Function (New York, 1953) pp. 208–9.
F. B. Pinion, Thomas Hardy: Art and Thought (London, 1977) p. 116.
Varley Lang, ‘Crabbe and Tess of the d’Urbervilles’, MLN, un (May 1938) 369–70.
David J. De Laura, ‘“The Ache of Modernism” in Hardy’s Later Novels’, ELH, xxxiv (1967), especially 392 ff.
See Robert Gittings, The Older Hardy (London, 1978), and Peter Casa-grande, Unity in Hardy’s Novels: ‘Repetitive Symmetries’ (London, 1982).
For a review of Hardy’s attitude towards Shelley and a list of criticism on the topic see Lennart A. Björk (ed.), The Literary Notes of Thomas Hardy 2 vols (Göteborg, 1974) pp. 357–8. Of the other four allusions to modern poetry, two are appropriately from Swinburne, another poet of ambiguous sexuality, while two are taken from Browning and used ironically.There is no discernable pattern to these clusters.
See R. G. Cox, Thomas Hardy: The Critical Heritage (New York, 1970) p. 236.
D. H. Lawrence, ‘Study of Thomas Hardy’, in Edward McDonald (ed.), Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence (New York, 1972) p. 486.
Howe, op. cit., p. 128. See also James Hazen, ‘The Tragedy of Tess Durbeyfield’, TSLL xi (spring 1969) 779–94;
Michael Murray, ‘The Patterns of Biblical and Classical Myth in the Novels of Thomas Hardy’, unpublished dissertation, New York University, 1972, p. 88;
Michael Millgate, Thomas Hardy: His Career as a Novelist (New York, 1971) p. 272;
James Hazen, ‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles and Antigone’, ELT, xiv (1971) 207–15;
Arnold Kettle, An Introduction to the English Novel Vol. II (New York: Harper & Row Torchbooks Edition, 1960) pp. 49–62; and
Douglas Brown, Thomas Hardy (London, 1954) pp. 89–98.
Bernard J. Paris, ‘“A Confusion of Many Standards”: Conflicting Value Systems in Tess of the d’Urbervilles’, NCF xxfiv (June 1969) 76.
M. D. Faber, ‘Tess and The Rape of Lucrece’, ELN, v (June 1968) 292–3.
J. I. M. Stewart, Thomas Hardy: A Critical Biography (New York, 1971) p. 191.
F. R. Southerington, Hardy’s Vision of Man (New York, 1971) p. 144.
Ian Gregor, The Great Web: The Form of Hardy’s Major Fiction (London, 1974) p. 209.
For a thorough discussion of this allusion, see L. M. Findlay, ‘Horace’s “Carmen Saeculare” and Jude the Obscure’, N&Q, xxn, (October 1977) 428–30.
See Norman Holland’s fine article, “Jude the Obscure”: Hardy’s Symbolic Indictment of Christianity’, NCF ix (June 1954) 54. See also Walter Gordon, ‘Father Time’s Suicide Note inJude the Obscure’, NCF xxii (December 1967) 299.
See Lewis Home,‘“The Art of Renunciation” in Hardy’s Novels’, SNNTS Iv(winter 1972) 556–67.
See Frederick McDowell, ‘In Defense of Arabella: A Note on Jude the Obscure’, ELN, i (June 1964) 274–80;
Lascelles Abercrombie, Thomas Hardy: A Critical Study (New York, 1927) p. 31; Pinion, A Hardy Companion p. 300.
See Robert Heilman, ‘Hardy’s Sue Bridehead’, NCF xx (March 1966) 307–23; Michael Steig, ’Sue Bridehead’, Novel, i (spring 1968) 260–6; the book-length studies of Hardy by Albert J. Guerard (Thomas Hardy: The Novels and Stories Cambridge, 1949) and Howe (op. cit.). For a treatment of Sue in historical perspective see also my essay in What Manner of Woman (New York, 1977) pp. 124–59.
See Mary Jacobus, ‘Sue the Obscure’, EIC, xxv (July 1975) 320.
For further discussion of the parallels between Jude’s and Sue’s relationship and the couple in ‘Epiphsychidion’ see Michael E. Hassett, ‘Compromised Romanticism in Jude the Obscure’, NCF, xxv (March 1971) 440–2.
For a discussion of this scene and a comparison with the death of Tess’s baby see Penelope Vigar, The Novels of Thomas Hardy (London, 1974) p. 207.
See Ward Hellstrom, ‘Hardy’s Scholar-Gypsy’, in George Goode (ed.), The English Novel in the Nineteenth Century, ’Illinois Studies in Language and Literature’, no. 63 (Urbana, 1972) p. 204.
Herman Meyer, The Poetics of Quotation in the European Novel trans. Theodore and Yetta Ziolkowski (Princeton, 1968) pp. 73, 89.
See David Leon Higdon, ‘The Sovereign Fragments: A Study of George Eliot’s Epigraphs’, unpublished dissertation, University of Kansas, 1968, pp. 1–2, 115.
Lionel Stevenson, The Ordeal of George Meredith (New York, 1953) pp. 322, 62.
Copyright information
© 1983 Marlene Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Springer, M. (1983). Aftercourses: Tess of the d’Urbervilles and Jude the Obscure. In: Hardy’s Use of Allusion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06389-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06389-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-06391-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-06389-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)