Abstract
The resistance that the peasants of Eastern Europe offered to the establishment of communist power was centred on the conflict stemming from the peasants’ dekire to retain an independent form of agriculture in contrast to the communist leaders’ determination (more pronounced in some cases than in others) to achieve the social transformation of the countryside in a collectivist direction. It is now a decade and a half since this collectivisation process was largely brought to a close. This transformation of the social features of the East European countryside, commencing in 1949, lasted some thirteen years and turned out to be a smoother and more thoroughgoing process in some countries than in others. The pace of collectivisation slowed markedly following Stalin’s death and in some countries a number of collective farms were dissolved. A second phase of collectivisation was launched between 1957 and 1959 and the establishment of collective agriculture in most countries of Eastern Europe was more or less complete by 1962. In Yugoslavia and Poland a second phase of collectivisation never was launched and agriculture there has largely remained in the hands of independent farmers since the fifties. The trauma of collectivisation thus lies even further back in those countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
R. C. Gripp; The Political System of Communism ( London: Nelson, 1973 ), p. 88.
V. V. Kusin, Political Grouping in the Czechoslovak Reform Movement ( London: Macmillan, 1972 ), p. 54.
S. Fischer-Galati, Twentieth Century Rumania (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), p. 213.
H. G. Skilling, Czechoslovakia’s Interrupted Revolution ( Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1976 ), p. 586.
A. E. Adams and J. S. Adams, Men versus Systems: Agriculture in the USSR, Poland and Czechoslovakia ( New York: Free Press, 1971 ), pp. 189–91.
Cf B. D. Denitch, The Legitimation of a Revolution: the Yugoslav Case ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976 ), pp. 68–9.
P. Green ‘The third round in Poland’, New Left Review, no. 101–2 (April, 1977), pp. 78, 96.
E. Ciupak ‘The changing face of rural Catholicism’, Polish Perspectives, vol. XIII (March 1975), p. 31.
Z. Salzmann and V. Scheufler, Komarov: a Czech Farming Village ( New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974 ), p. 120.
E. Fel and R. Hofer, Proper Peasants ( Chicago: Aldine, 1969 ), p. 384.
I. Winner, A Slovenian Village: Zerovnica ( Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press, 1971 ), p. 197.
S. K. Pavlowitch, Yugoslavia ( London: Ernest Benn, 1971 ), p. 348.
N. Pano, The Albanian cultural revolution’, Problems of Communism, vol. xxoi, no. 4 (July-August 1974 ), p. 49.
J. Halpern, ‘Farming as a way of life: Yugoslav peasant attitudes’, in J. Karcz, ed., Soviet and East European Agriculture ( Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1967 ), p. 381.
W. G. Lockwood, ‘The peasant-worker in Yugoslavia’, in B. L. Faber, ed., The Social Structure of Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger, 1976 ), p. 284.
P. Toma and I. Volgyes, Politics in Hungary ( San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman, 1977 ), p. 131.
G. Konrad and I. Szelényi, ‘Social conflicts of underurbanization: the Hungarian case’, in M. Field, ed., Social Consequences of Modernization in Communist Societies ( Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976 ), p. 166.
A. Matejko, Social Change and Stratification in Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger, 1974 ), p. 75.
A. Olszewska, Wies uprzemysiowiona (Warsaw, 1969), pp. 142–3.
K-E Wädekin, ‘The place of agriculture in the European communist economies: a statistical essay’, Soviet Studies, vol. xamc (August, 1977), p. 249.
B. Racz, ‘Political changes in Hungary after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia’, Slavic Review, vol. xamc, (December, 1970), p. 645.
B. Mieczkowski, Personal and Social Consumption in Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger, 1975 ), p. 41.
K. Sontheimer and W. Bleek, The Government and Politics of East Germany ( London: Hutchinson, 1975 ), p. 162.
T. Bergmann, Farm Policies in Socialist Countries ( Westmead: Saxon House, 1975 ), p. 97.
F. Donath, ‘Economic growth and socialist agriculture’, New Hungarian Quarterly 66 (Summer 1977), pp. 121–2.
F. Singleton, Twentieth Century Yugoslavia ( London: Macmillan, 1976 ), p. 224.
D. Dyker, ‘Yugoslavia: unity of diversity?’, in A. Brown and J. Gray, eds., Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States ( London: Macmillan, 1977 ), p. 68.
P. Shoup, ‘The national question in Yugoslavia’, Problems of Communism, vol. XXI (January-February, 1972), p. 24.
N. Lang, The dialectics of decentralisation: economic reform and regional inequality in Yugoslavia’, World Politics, vol. XXVIII (April 1975), p. 328.
J. Tepicht, ‘A project for research on the peasant revolution of our time’, Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. II, ( April 1975 ), p. 263.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1979 Paul G. Lewis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, P.G. (1979). Potential Sources of Opposition in the East European Peasantry. In: Tőkés, R.L. (eds) Opposition in Eastern Europe. St Antony’s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04472-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04472-6_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-04474-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-04472-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)