Skip to main content

Opposition and Para-Opposition: Critical Currents in Hungary, 1968–78

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: St Antony’s ((STANTS))

Abstract

The definitions of opposition in East European societies have tended to be derived from Polish, Czechoslovak and Soviet experience. They assume the existence of groups of individuals, acting in a more or less organised fashion, who have mounted direct or indirect challenges of their governments by seeking to exert pressure on these governments for specific policy objectives. The aim of constraining these governments to abide by their own legality seems to be one of the characteristic features of opposition in the 1970s. Equally significant is that this opposition prefers generally to act outside the functioning of the system and to bring pressure on the system from outside. The use of western media as a significant lever is, again, one of the striking features of the modus operandi of the opposition. In this context, the free and untrammelled distribution of information has played a central role in the self-generation and self-sustaining aspects of the opposition. Mutual example — encouragement from one opposition group to another — and also imitation are a further feature of opposition. Comparatively little of this is applicable to Hungary.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ivan Szelényi, ‘Notes on the “Budapest School”’, Critique, no. 8 (Summer 1977) pp. 61–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tamâs Földvâri, ‘Informalizmus az ipari szövetkezetek és az Miami iparvâllalatok külső kapcsolataiban’, Ergonómia, vol. 10, no. 2 (1977) pp. 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stefan Mandel, ‘Filling a Vacuum’, Index on Censorship, vol. 7, no. 2 (March 1977) pp. 40–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. György Markus, ‘Vitâk és irânyzatok a marxista filozófiâban’, Kortdrs, vol. 12, no. 7 (July 1968) pp. 1109–28.

    Google Scholar 

  5. György Berkovits, ‘Vâltozatok a szociografiâra’, Valosdg, vol. 18, no. 5 (May 1975) pp. 46–61 at p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gyula Borbândi, ‘Mit fedeznek fel Magyarorszâg felfedezzi?’, Clj LktOhatkr(Munich) vol. 28, nos. 3–4 (December 1977) pp. 315–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. William Robinson, ‘Who are the real Marxists now?’, Index on Censorship, vol. 2, no. 3 (1973) pp. 71–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agnes Heller, Portrévkzlatok az etika történetébifl (Budapest, 1976); ‘A kötelességen til’, Korunk, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mik1ös Haraszti, The Worker in a Worker’s State ( London: Penguin, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. György Konrad and Ivan Szelényi, ‘A késleltetett varosfejlödés târsadalmi konfliktusai’, Valôsdg, vol. 15, no. 12 (December 1971) pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. György Berkovits, Vildgvdros Hatdrdban (1976); seep. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  12. György Konrad, A vdrosalapftö (1977). In English: The City Builder (New York-London: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferenc Karinthy, ‘Irôszobam — beszélgetés Komlós Aladarral’, Kortdrs, vol. 21, no. 5 (May 1977) pp. 816–27 at p. 819.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bulcsu Bertha, Interjd Csurka Istvannal’, Jelenkor, vol. 20, no. 2 (February 1977) pp. 109–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karoly Szakonyi, ‘Hongkongi parôka’, Uj Irds, vol. 13, no. 11 (November 1973) pp. 16–58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agnes Havas, ‘Nacionalista hatâsok gyermekeinkre’, Tdrsadalmi Szemle, vol. 22, no. 3 (March 1967) pp. 97–111 at p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mâria Mârkus, ‘Biiszkeség és előitélet’, Valosdg, vol. 10, no. 4 (April 1967) pp. 63–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ivan Sândor, A vizsgdlat iratai: tudósttds a tiszaeszldri per körülményeiröl (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. (Compiler) Levente Sipos, ‘Vita a történetszemléletrel és a hazafias nevelésrel’, Pdrttörténeti Közlemények, vol. 18, no. 2 (1972) pp. 121–46.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gyula Illyés, Hajszdlgyökerek (1971) and Itt élned kell, 2 vols. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Csaba Pléh and Istvân C zigler, ‘Politikai foglmak érzelmi jelentése’, Rddió is Televizió Szemle, vol. 8, no. 3 (1976) pp. 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 George Schöpflin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schöpflin, G. (1979). Opposition and Para-Opposition: Critical Currents in Hungary, 1968–78. In: Tőkés, R.L. (eds) Opposition in Eastern Europe. St Antony’s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04472-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics