Abstract
My contention is that this scheme is not just analytically simple, but is empirically true: that these types of government, studied historically (including contemporary history), reveal these broad characteristics; and also that these characteristics, if the questions they answer separately are put together, are in some way systematically related — as best expressed by the three main concepts. One should reach the same results whichever way one works. This is, of course, too neat by far. The characteristics are themselves generalisations of a considerable degree of abstraction, like any generalisations, so liable to particular exceptions and peculiar and famous hybrids at any given time and place. But the argument comes down to this (if advanced in full): to convince the historian that generalisation is sensible and that any generalisation involves simplification or abstraction; and to convince the political scientist that these apparent systematic relationships can be expressed thus simply — without any more elaborate conceptual framework or any special vocabulary of induced (i.e. quite unknown to the actors in political events) processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1973 Government and Opposition
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crick, B. (1973). Conclusions and Difficulties. In: Basic Forms of Government. Studies in Comparative Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01571-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01571-9_18
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-13753-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01571-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)