Abstract
At age 4, Michelle was a cheerful and creative little girl, but something set her apart from her peers. She had an unremarkable birth history, had been relatively healthy, and achieved her early speech, language, and motor milestones within age expectations. Despite these positive indicators, her parents felt a nagging concern about her that they could not identify. Michelle's paternal uncle had a history of learning and behavior difficulties, but her parents felt that his problems were different than hers. As a preschooler, she was immature, inattentive, and impulsive compared with other children of her age. She had difficulty maintaining eye contact and following directions, and did not always respond when her name was called. She often lacked energy to complete physical activities expected for her age. Her parents' suspicions were somewhat confirmed when Michelle did not do well on the language and motor portions of a kindergarten screening. This prompted their quest to find out what was causing her developmental and social difficulties. Over the course of the next 5 years, she underwent two neuropsychological evaluations, three comprehensive Individualized Education Program (IEP) assessments, as well as informal assessments by academic tutors. None of the testing resulted in a satisfactory diagnosis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Resources for Clinicians
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders [Technical report]. Available at http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journls/deskref/default.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). (Central Auditory Processing Disorders— the Role of the Audiologist [Position statement]. Available at http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
Bellis, T. J. (2003). Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: from science to practice (2nd Ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Learning.
Katz, J., & Tillery, K. L. (2005). Can Central Auditory Processing Tests Resist Supramodal Influences? American Journal of Audiology, 14, 124–127.
Masters, M., Stecker, N., & Katz, J. (1998) Central auditory processing disorders: Mostly management. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Richards, G. J. (2001). The source for processing disorders. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.
Rosenberg, G. (2002). Classroom acoustics and personal FM technology in management of auditory processing disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 23(4), 309–318.
Resources for Families
American Academy of Audiology. 11730 Plaza America Drive, Suite 3000. Reston, VA 20190. Toll Free: (800) 222–2336 at http://www.audiology.org
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 10801 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. Toll free: (800) 638–8244 at http://www.asha.org
National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders at http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/voice/auditory
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carneol, S.O. (2010). Elusive, Inclusive, or Conclusive? (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder. In: Apps, J.N., Newby, R.F., Roberts, L.W. (eds) Pediatric Neuropsychology Case Studies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78965-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78965-1_29
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6080-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-78965-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)