Skip to main content

Population Forecasting

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 30))

Abstract

Population forecasters have paid too little attention to forecast accuracy, uncertainty, and approaches other than the cohort-component method. They should track forecast errors and use them to adjust forecasts. They have chosen measures of forecast accuracy arbitrarily, with the result that flawed error measures are widely used in population forecasting. An examination of past forecasts would help establish what approaches are most accurate in particular applications and under what circumstances. Researchers have found that alternative approaches to population forecasting, including econometric models and extrapolation, provide more accurate forecasts than the cohort-component method in at least some situations. If they can determine the conditions under which these approaches are best, they can use them instead of the established method or in combination with it.

Methodological advances have made it possible to produce population forecasts with a greater degree of disaggregation and decomposition than before. If this decomposition allows a better understanding of the causal forces underlying population change, then decomposition may improve forecast accuracy. Even if disaggregation and decomposition do not improve overall forecast accuracy, they may lead to improved understanding or accurate forecasts of important components of the population, such as the elderly widowed population. Uncertainty has not been well-integrated into population forecasts. Researchers are pushing ahead in three main areas: population forecasts that include probability distributions; combining expert judgment and statistical methods; and the specification of situations that provide an internally consistent forecast of the population under particular circumstances. Evidence suggests that relying on experts to choose the fertility and mortality assumptions of the forecast has done little to improve forecast accuracy, but this is probably because expert opinion has been obtained in an unstructured way. Experience in other areas of forecasting has shown how to use experts to improve forecast accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlburg, D. A. (1992), “Error measures and the choice of a forecast method,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 99–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlburg, D. A. (1995), “Simple versus complex models: Evaluation, accuracy, and combining,” Mathematical Population Studies, 5, 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlburg, D. A. (1998), “Using economic information and combining to improve forecast accuracy in demography,” Working paper, Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlburg, D. A. and K.C. Land (1992), “Population forecasting: Guest editors’ introduction,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. (1990), “Stochastic methods in population forecasts,” International Journal of Forecasting, 6, 521–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. (1997). “Scenarios, uncertainty, and conditional forecasts of the world population,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Part 1,160: 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. and B. D. Spencer (1985), “Uncertain population forecasting,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. and B. D. Spencer, (1990), “Error models for official mortality forecasts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. G. and R. Fildes (2001). “Econometric forecasting,” in J.S. Armstrong, Ed., Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. (2001), “Overconfidence in judgmental forecasting,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (1985), Long-Range Forecasting (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (2001a), “Combining forecasts,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. ( 2001 b), “Evaluating forecasting methods,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. and F. Collopy (1992), “Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. and F. Collopy (1993), “Causal forces: Structuring knowledge for timeseries extrapolation,” Journal of Forecasting, 12, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, E. (1895), “The probability of a cessation of the growth of population in England and Wales during the next century,” Economic Journal, 5, 505–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2000) “Imparting structural instability to mortality forecasts: Testing for sensitive dependence on initial conditions with innovations,” Mathematical Population Studies, 8, 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, C. (2001), “Prediction intervals for time series,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R.T. (1989), “Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography,” International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 559–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, F. and J. S. Armstrong (1992), “Rule-based forecasting: Development and validation of an expert systems approach to combining time series extrapolation,” Management Science, 38, 1394–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, F. and J. S. Armstrong (1994), “Decomposition of time series by causal forces: Using domain knowledge to extrapolate highway deaths,” Working paper at hops.wharton.upenn.edu/forecast

    Google Scholar 

  • Collopy, F., M. Adya and J. S. Armstrong (2001), “Expert systems in forecasting,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fildes, R. (1992) “The evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, I. and N. Harvey (1999), “Combining forecasts: What information do judges need to outperform the simple average?” International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, S. and Y. C. Yu (1979), “United Nations’ new population projections and analysis of ex post facto errors.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isserman, A. (1977), “The accuracy of population projections for subcounty regions,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43, 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilman, N. (1990), Uncertainty in National Population Forecasting: Issues, Backgrounds, Analyses, Recommendations. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilman, N. (1997), `Ex-post errors in official population forecasts in industrialized countries,“ Journal of Official Statistics, 13, 245–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilman, N. (1998), “How accurate are the United Nations’ world population projections?” Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1981), “The limits of population forecasting,” Population and Development Review, 7, 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1982), “Can knowledge improve forecasts?” Population and Development Review, 8, 729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (1974), “Forecasting births in a post transition population: Stochastic renewal with serially correlated errors,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 607–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D. (1998), “Probabilistic approaches to population forecasting,” Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 156–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D., L. Carter and S. Tuljapurkar (1995), “Disaggregation in population forecasting: Do we need it? And how to do it simply,” Mathematical Population Studies, 5, 217234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. F. (1995), “Complexity, accuracy, and utility of official population projections,” Mathematical Population Studies, 5, 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W. (1994), Population, Development, Environment: Understanding their Interactions in Mauritius. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W. (1995), “Scenario analysis in population projection,” IIASA working paper 9557 Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., A. Goujon and G. Doblhammer-Reiter (1998), “Adding education to age and sex,” Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., W. Sanderson. and S. Scherbov (1998), “Expert-based probabilistic population projections,” Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W., J. W. Vaupel and D. A. Ahlburg (1998). “Frontiers of population forecasting,” in Special Issue of Population and Development Review, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, D. G. (2001) “Decomposition for judgmental forecasting and estimation,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNown, R. and A. Rogers (1992), “Forecasting cause specific mortality using tune series methods,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNown, R, A. Rogers and J. Little (1995), “Simplicity and complexity in extrapolative population forecasting models,” Mathematical Population Studies, 8, 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, S., R. Hamm, P. Voss, D. Fannin and B. Pecotte, (1991) “Evaluating small area population projections”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 57, 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, S., F. Leistritz, R.R. Hamm, S-S Hwang and B. Parpia (1984) “An assessment of the accuracy of regional economic-demographic projection models,” Demography, 21, 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant, P. N. and W. H. Starbuck (1990), “Innocents in the forest: Forecasting and research methods,” Journal of Management, 16, 433–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflaumer, P. (1988), “The accuracy of U.N. population projections,” Proceedings, Annual Meeting. American Statistical Association, New Orleans, August, Social Statistics Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflaumer, P. (1992), “Forecasting U.S. population totals with the Box-Jenkins approach,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (1995), “Population projections: Simple versus complex models,” Mathematical Population Studies, Special Issue, 5, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, G. and G. Wright (2001), “Expert opinion in forecasting: The role of the Delphi technique,” in J. S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, W. C. (1998), “Knowledge can improve forecasts! A review of selected socioeconomic population projection models,” Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 88–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R. and A. Crosetti (1951), “Accuracy of the ratio method for forecasting city populations,” Land Economics, 27, 346–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. S. (1953), “Forecasting the population of small areas,” Land Economics, 29, 7288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. (1987), “Tests of forecast accuracy and bias for county population projections,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 991–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. (1997), “Further thoughts on simplicity and complexity in population projection models,” International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. and M. Shahidullah, (1995), “Evaluating population projection errors for census tracts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. and T. Sincich (1988), “Stability over time in the distribution of population forecast errors,” Demography, 25, 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. and T. Sincich (1990), “On the relationship between length of base period and population forecast errors,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. and T. Sincich (1991), “An empirical analysis of the effect of length of the forecast horizon on population forecast errors,” Demography, 28, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. and T. Sincich (1992), “Evaluating the forecast accuracy and bias of alternative population projections for states,” International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.K., J. Tayman and D. Swanson, (2001), State and Local Population Projections:Methodology and Analysis. Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoto, M. (1983), “The accuracy of population projections,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayman, J., Schaefer, E. and L. Carter (1998), “The role of population size in the determination and prediction of population forecast error: An evaluation using confidence intervals for subcounty areas,” Population Research and Policy Review, 17, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Imhoff, E. and W. Post (1998), “Microsimulation methods for population projection,” Population, 10, 97–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, P. R. and B. D. Kale (1985), “Refinements to small-area population projection models: Results of a test based on 128 Wisconsin communities,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1954), “Empirical study of the accuracy of selected methods of projecting state populations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 480–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y., J. W. Vaupel and W. Zhenglian (1998), “Household projection using conventional demographic data,” Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahlburg, D.A. (2001). Population Forecasting. In: Armstrong, J.S. (eds) Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7401-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47630-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics