Skip to main content

Processing of Champ ACC and RSO Data in the Earth Gravity Field Determination

  • Conference paper
A Window on the Future of Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 128))

  • 2436 Accesses

Abstract

The high frequency accelerometer can provide non-gravitational perturbation force acceleration acting on CHAMP satellite. In CHAMP standard science product level-2 data, the acceleration, star camera, thruster firing and some corrections data are available. They play important roles in the determination of the earth gravity field. In this paper, the level-2 data (Day of year 1–100, 2002) are processed. Before applying the corrections, the curves of mean acceleration per day are very rough. After corrections, the curves show clear trend. On the other hand, the precise orbit of CHAMP is necessary for the determination of the earth gravity field. Now, the rapid science orbit data are provided by two organizations, GFZ and JPL. The data of a randomly chosen period (Day of year 267–269, 2002) from the two organizations are compared. The results of the comparison show that the difference between the two RSO data is notable, especially at the end part of orbit files. After getting rid of the end part of each file, there is no obvious system bias exists between the two RSO data and the magnitude of the difference keeps only about 0.1 m. Finally, some conclusions are drawn and some suggestions are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bae S. and Schutz B. E., Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) Precision Attitude Determination, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2001.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappellari J. O., Velez C. D. and Fuchs A. J., Mathematical Theory of Goddard Trajectory Determination System (N76-24291-24302), Goddard Space Flight Center, 1976.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Förste Ch., Format Description:The CHAMP Data Format. GFZ-Potsdam, 2002.3

    Google Scholar 

  • GFZ, Announcement of Opportunity for CHAMP. GFZ-Potsdam, 2001.5

    Google Scholar 

  • König R., Format Description:The CHAMP Orbit Format CHORB. GFZ-Potsdam, 2001.6

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D., IERS Convention (1996). USA: U.S. Naval Observatory, 1996.7

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer Ch., The Sensitivity Analysis of GPS-tracked Satellite Missions (Case Study CHAMP): Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Stuttgart, 2000.10

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R., Baustett G. König R. and Reigber Ch., Orbit Predictions for CHAMP — Development and Status. First CHAMP Science Meeting, GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany, Jan 22–25, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Luo, J., Ning, J.S. (2005). Processing of Champ ACC and RSO Data in the Earth Gravity Field Determination. In: Sansò, F. (eds) A Window on the Future of Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27432-4_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics