Skip to main content

Finding a Modern Role for the Prior Appropriation Doctrine in the American West

  • Chapter
Book cover Water Institutions: Policies, Performance and Prospects

Part of the book series: Water Resources Development and Management ((WRDM))

  • 696 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9.6 References

  • Anderson T, Johnson R (1986) The problem of instream flows. Economic Inquiry 24:535–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson R (1998) Maintaining the status quo: protecting established water uses in the Pacific Northwest despite the role of prior appropriation. Research Publication PO97-1, Northwest Water Law & Policy Project

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby B (1990) Transactions costs and efficiency in western water allocation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:1184–1192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufford W (1994) Water law after Sinking Creek. In: University of Washington (ed) Proceedings of the Sinking Creek decision: water rights in the 21st century, pp A2–A12

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2001) You say potato, I say electricity. July 12, 2001, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan C (1973) The doctrine of prior appropriation and its impact on water development: a critical survey. American Journal of Economics & Society 32:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould G (1988) Water rights transfers and third-party effects. Land and Water Law Review 23:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J, Whittlesey N (1992) Contingent water markets for salmon recovery. (Unpublished working paper, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J, Whittlesey N, Halverson P (1989) Interruptible water markets in the Pacific Northwest. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J, Huffaker R (2003) Conflict in US Irrigation. In: Lascano R, Sojka R (eds) Irrigation of Agricultural Crops Monograph. USDA-ARS, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson D (2003) Feds to take on Western water conflicts. The Spokesman-Review. May 3, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker R, Whittlesey N (2000) The role of prior appropriation in allocating water resources into the 21st century. International Journal of Water Resources Development 16:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman J (1983) Instream water use: public and private alternatives. In: Anderson T (ed) Water rights. Pacific Institute, San Francisco, pp 249–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymon S (2002) Klamath’s water is better used downriver, study finds. The Los Angeles Times, November 5, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson G, Sullivan G, Cosgrove D, Schmidt R (1999) Recharge of the Snake River Plain aquifer: transitioning from incidental to managed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman J (1959) Water law and private decision making: a critique. Journal of Law and Economics 2:41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millstein M (2002a) Top official pledges study of fish die-off. The Oregonian. October 3, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Millstein M (2002b) Klamath diagnosis is a warning for future. The Oregonian. December 19, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC) (2001) Farmers and conservationists agree on solution for Klamath Basin water crisis, in http://www.org.onrc.org, June 15, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulver R (1988) Liability rules as a solution to the problem of waste in western water law: an economic analysis. California Law Review 76:671, citing US Bureau of Reclamation 1973, Shut Off the Water-The Root Zone is Full: A Study of Irrigation Water Use

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettkowski V, (1993) Department of Ecology, 858 P 2d 232

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J (1980) The public trust: a sovereign’s ancient prerogative becomes the people’s environmental right. University of California Davis Law Review 14:195

    Google Scholar 

  • The Spokane Spokesman Review (1999) Water suit against agency headed to court. December 4, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Voluntary Settlement Agreement (2002) Benton County Superior Court Cases No. 09-2-82852-7 and 97-2-01041-9. November 20, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade J (1982) Efficiency and optimization in irrigation analysis. In: Whittlesey N (ed) Energy and water management in western irrigated agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C (1992) Crossing the next meridian. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson C (1991) West’s grand old water doctrine dies. High Country News 23:1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huffaker, R. (2005). Finding a Modern Role for the Prior Appropriation Doctrine in the American West. In: Gopalakrishnan, C., Biswas, A.K., Tortajada, C. (eds) Water Institutions: Policies, Performance and Prospects. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26567-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics