Skip to main content

Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3812))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Off-the-shelf packages such as SAP need to be configured to suit the requirements of an organization. Reference models support the configuration of these systems. Existing reference models use rather traditional languages. For example, the SAP reference model uses Event-driven Process Chains (EPCs). Unfortunately, traditional languages like EPCs do not capture the configuration-aspects well. Consider for example the concept of “choice” in the control-flow perspective. Although any process modeling language, including EPCs, offers a choice construct (e.g., the XOR connector in EPCs), a single construct will not be able to capture the time dimension, scope, and impact of a decision. Some decisions are taken at run-time for a single case while other decisions are taken at build-time impacting a whole organization and all current and future cases. This position paper discusses the need for configurable process models as a basic building block for reference modeling. The focus is on the control-flow perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Basten, T.: Inheritance of Workflows: An Approach to Tackling Problems Related to Change. Theoretical Computer Science 270(1-2), 125–203 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basten, T., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Inheritance of Behavior. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 47(2), 47–145 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Knackstedt, R.: Konstruktion von Referenzmodellierungssprachen: Ein Ordnungsrahmen zur Spezifikation von Adaptionsmechanismen für Informationsmodelle. Wirtschafts informatik 46(4), 251–264 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Dreiling, A., Knackstedt, R., Kuropka, D.: Configurative Process Modeling – Outlining an Approach to increased Business Process Model Usability. In: Proceedings of the 15th Information Resources Management Association International Conference, New Orleans (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernus, P.: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, Version 1.6.3. IFIPIFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curran, T., Keller, G.: SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model, Upper Saddle River (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dreiling, A., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Sadiq, W., Khan, S.: Modeldriven process configuration of enterprise systems. In: Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J., Eckert, S., Isselhorst, T. (eds.) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005. eEconomy, eGovernment, eSociety, pp. 687–706. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Methoden zur Wiederverwendung von Referenzmodellen – Übersicht und Taxonomie. In: Becker, J., Knackstedt, R. (eds.) Referenzmodellierung 2002: Methoden – Modelle – Erfahrungen, Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik Nr. 90, pp. 9–33. University of Münster, Münster (2002) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Glabbeek, R.J., Weijland, W.P.: Branching Time and Abstraction in Bisimulation Semantics. Journal of the ACM 43(3), 555–600 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture, and Implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.W.: Semantische Processmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Processketten (EPK). Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Heft 89, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken (1992) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kindler, E.: On the Semantics of EPCs: A Framework for Resolving the Vicious Circle. In: Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3080, pp. 82–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Milner, R.: A Calculus of Communication Systems. LNCS, vol. 92. Springer, Berlin (1980)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen, M., Raj, J.: BPMN and Business Process Management – Introduction to the New Business Process Modeling Standard, Popkin Software (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosemann, M.: Komplexitätsmanagement in Prozessmodellen: methodenspezifische Gestaltungsempfehlungen für die Informationsmodellierung. Gabler, Wiesbaden (1996) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosemann, M.: Application Reference Models and Building Blocks for Management and Control (ERP Systems). In: Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Enterprise Architecture, pp. 596–616. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Configurable Reference Modelling Language. In: Information Systems (2005) (to appear, also available from BPMCenter.org)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosemann, M., Schütte, R.: Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Referenzmodellierung. In: Becker, J., Rosemann, M., Schütte, R. (eds.) Entwicklungsstand und Perspektiven der Referenzmodellierung, Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik Nr. 52, pp. 16–33. University of Münster, Münster (1997) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scheer, A.W.: Business Process Engineering, Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheer, A.W.: ARIS: Business Process Modelling. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Schütte, R.: Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Referenzmodellierung – Konstruktion konfigurations- und anpassungsorientierter Modelle. Gabler, Wiesbaden (1998) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schwegmann, A.: Objektorientierte Referenzmodellierung: theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. Gabler, Wiesbaden (1999) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.H. (2006). Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3812. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11678564_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11678564_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32595-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32596-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics