Abstract
Run-time checks are often assumed to be a cost-effective way of improving the dependability of software components, by checking required properties of their outputs and flagging an output as incorrect if it fails the check. However, evaluating how effective they are going to be in a future application is difficult, since the effectiveness of a check depends on the unknown faults of the program to which it is applied. A programming contest, providing thousands of programs written to the same specifications, gives us the opportunity to systematically test run-time checks to observe statistics of their effects on actual programs. In these examples, run-time checks turn out to be most effective for unreliable programs. For more reliable programs, the benefit is relatively low as compared to the gain that can be achieved by other (more expensive) measures, most notably multiple-version diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blum, M., Wasserman, H.: Software reliability via run-time result-checking. Technical Report TR-94-053, International Computer Science Institute (October 1994)
Jhumka, A., Gärtner, F.C., Fetzer, C., Suri, N.: On systematic design of fast and perfect detectors. Technical Report 200263, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFDL), School of Computer and Communication Sciences (September 2002)
Lee, P.A., Anderson, T.: Fault Tolerance; Principles and Practice, 2nd edn. Dependable Computing and Fault-Tolerant Systems, vol. 3. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)
Leveson, N.G., Cha, S.S., Knight, J.C., Shimeall, T.J.: The use of self checks and voting in software error detection: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(4), 432–443 (1990)
Meyer, B.: Design by contract. Computer (IEEE) 25(10), 40–51 (1992)
Popov, P., Strigini, L.: The reliability of diverse systems: A contribution using modelling of the fault creation process. In: DSN 2001, International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Göteborg, Sweden (July 2001)
Rela, M., Madeira, H., Silva, J.G.: Experimental evaluation of the fail-silent behavior of programs with consistency checks. In: FTCS-26, Sendai, Japan, pp. 394–403 (1996)
Skiena, S., Revilla, M.: Programming Challenges, March 2003. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
van der Meulen, M.J.P., Bishop, P.G., Revilla, M.: An exploration of software faults and failure behaviour in a large population of programs. In: The 15th IEEE International Symposium of Software Reliability Engineering, St. Malo, France, November 2–5, pp. 101–12 (2004)
van der Meulen, M.J.P., Revilla, M.: The effectiveness of choice of programming language as a diversity seeking decision. In: Dal Cin, M., Kaâniche, M., Pataricza, A. (eds.) EDCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3463, pp. 199–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Vinter, J., Aidemark, J., Folkesson, P., Karlsson, J.: Reducing critical failures for control algorithms using executable assertions and best effort recovery. In: DSN 2001, International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Goteborg, Sweden (2001)
Wasserman, H., Blum, M.: Software reliability via run-time result-checking. Journal of the ACM 44(6), 826–849 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
van der Meulen, M.J.P., Strigini, L., Revilla, M.A. (2005). On the Effectiveness of Run-Time Checks. In: Winther, R., Gran, B.A., Dahll, G. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11563228_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11563228_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29200-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32000-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)