Abstract
The process that led to the adoption of the latest amendment to the New England Fishery Management Council’s (NEFMC) Multispecies (groundfish) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) provides an excellent case study of the movement from primarily top-down management to a variation on adaptive co-management. The contributions of a policy entrepreneur and institutional leader to this process are noted as critical. Factors constraining the participation of fishing industry members in the development of groundfish regulations, a brief history of groundfish regulations, and the various combinations of rules offered as options by the Council are reviewed. In response to the harsh criticism and controversy over the degree to which those options would restrict fishing and be likely to devastate communities, the Council offered fishing industry members a last chance to recommend a different combination of management tools — as long as they adhered to the tools that had been discussed at public hearings. Three fishing organisations offered plans that were considered. The Council ultimately selected a plan from the Northeast Seafood Coalition, a broad-based industry group, which emphasises flexible or adaptive mechanisms and optimism for the future. This case suggests that the negotiation of power and authority is important in the context of management in a complex setting with a diverse constituency, and, equally important, communication and outreach are essential elements for change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acheson, J M (2003) Capturing the Commons, Hanover, University Press of New England
AMPC (2004) Auction manager’s personal communication
APC (2004) Anonymous personal communication
Berkes, F, Colding, J and Folke, C (2003) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Brazer, E (2003) Does the Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Have a Future In The Gulf of Maine?, Brown University Center for Environmental Studies Thesis
Dale, N (1989) ‘Getting to co-management: social learning in the redesign of fisheries management’ in E Pinkerton (ed) Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press: 49–72
Deese, H (2004) Personal communication
Dyer, CL and McGoodwin, JR (eds) (1994) Folk Management in the World’s Fisheries: Lessons for Modern Fisheries Management, Niwott, CO, University Press of Colorado
ENRC [Environment and Natural Resources Committee] (2001) Inquiry into Fisheries Management First Report: Co-Management, Australia, Government Printer for the State of Victoria, No. 124: Session 1999–2001
Gladwell, M (2000) The Tipping Point, Boston, MA, Little, Brown and Company
Hall-Arber, M, Dyer, C, Poggie, J, McNally, J, and Gagne, R (2001) New England’s Fishing Communities, Cambridge, MA, MIT Sea Grant College Program
Hall-Arber, M, Robinson, S, and Bergeron, D (2002) Fishing Industry Economic Needs Assessment, Massachusetts Fishermen’s Partnership Report, Gloucester MA
Holling, CS and Meffe, GK, (1996) ‘Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management’ Conservation Biology 10:328–37
Honneland, G (1999) ‘Co-management and communities in the Barents Sea fisheries’ Human Organization 58(4):397–404
Jentoft, S and Kristoffersen, T (1989) ‘Fishermen’s co-management: the case of the Lofoten fishery’ Human Organization 48(4):355–365
Jentoft, S and McCay, B (1995) ‘User participation in fisheries management: lessons drawn from international Experiences’ Marine Policy 19(3):227–246
McCay, B (1989) ‘Co-management of a clam revitalization project: the New Jersey “Spawner Sanctuary” Program’ in E Pinkerton (ed) Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press: 103–124
McCay, BJ and Finlayson, AC (1995) ‘The political ecology of crisis and institutional change: the case of the northern cod’ presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC, November 15–19
NAMA [Northwest Atlantic Marine Alliance] (2003) ‘Amendment 13 — a composite alternative to address rebuilding requirements: reduced days-at-sea with phased area management’, Comments submitted to NEFMC
NEFMC [Northeast Fishery Management Council] (2003a) ‘Northeast Multispecies Amendment’ 13 SEIS, 18 December 2003
NEFMC [Northeast Fishery Management Council] (2003b) ‘Public Hearing Document for Draft Amendment 13 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan’, New England Fisheries Management Council
Neis, T (2004) Personal communication
Odell, J (2004) Perception of Legitimacy in Fisheries Management: A case study of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Horseshoe Crab Fishery Management Plan, Kingston, RI, University of Rhode Island, Master’s Thesis
Olsson, P, Folke, C, and Hahn, T (2004) ‘Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden’ Ecology and Society 9(4):2
Ostrom, E (1990) Governing the Commons, New York, Cambridge University Press
Pinkerton, E (ed) (1989) Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press
Plante, J (2004) ‘Groundfish fleet tries DAS leasing, shuns transfers’ Commercial Fisheries News 31:12 (August)
Pomeroy, R and Guieb (2004) (in preparation) A Handbook on Community-based Fisheries Co-management, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada
Raymond, M (2004) Personal communication
Smith, ME (1990) ‘Chaos in Fisheries Management’ MAST 3(2):1–13
Stein, J (1997) ‘How institutions learn: a socio-cognitive perspective’ Journal of Economic Issues 31(3):729–740
USC [United States Code] (1996) 16 USC 1801–1882, April 13, 1976, as amended 1978–1980, 1982–1984, 1986–1990, 1992–1994 and 1996. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act: Public Law 94–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall-Arber, M. (2005). Co-Management at the Eleventh Hour? Participation in the Governance of the New England Groundfish Fishery. In: Gray, T.S. (eds) Participation in Fisheries Governance. Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3777-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3778-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)