Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender and Interaction

  • Chapter
Handbook of the Sociology of Gender

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1992). Topic transitions in physician-patient interviews: Power, gender and discourse change. Language in Society, 21, 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. (1989). Networking among women entrepreneurs. In O. Hagan, C. Rivchun, & D. Sexton (Eds.), Women-owned businesses. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing a sociological perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. R., & Blanchard, P. N, (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 10–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E. (1982). Verbal and non-verbal behavior in single-sex and mixed-sex groups: Are traditional sex roles changing? Psychological Reports, 51, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, E., & Johnson, F. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9, 1183–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkwell, J. W., & Berger, J. (1994). Gender, status and behavior in task situations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. N., & Bielby, V. T. (1984). A woman’s place is with other women: Sex segregation in the workplace. In B. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, H., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M, (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. & Schwartz, J., (1984). Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1979). Socialization influences on personality development in males and females. In M.M. Parks (Ed.), APA Master lecture series on issues of sex and gender in psychology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1972). Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review 37, 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, P. H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women’s speech: An empirical examination. Communications Monographs 48, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. & Lui, L. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7, 262–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, D., Gerritsern, M. M., & De Haan, D. (1979). Speech differences between men and women: On the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I., Vogel, S., Broverman, D., Clarkson, N, F., & Rosenkrantz, P. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A reappraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review 56, 836–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Cast, A. (1997). Parental status and gender identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S, (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., & Geis, F. L. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. E. (1988). Gender differences in job-related networks. Work and Occupations, 15, 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M. (1986a). An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 12, 137–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M. (1986b). Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon. Instructional Science, 14, 381–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. L. (1989). Gender differences in interaction style and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 565–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. (1990). Gender, language and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. L. (1991). Gender, status, and influence. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. L. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes, Vol. 8, (pp. 89–113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., & Loeber, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cota, A., & Dion, K. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 770–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoffs hypotheses. Language in Society, 6, 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. M., & Gilbert, L. A. (1989). Effect of dispositional and situational influences on women’s dominance expression in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. R, Brown, C. E., Heltman, K. Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drass, K. A. (1986). The effect of gender identity on conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 294–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 543–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakins, B., & Eakins, R. G. (1978). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In B. L. Dubois & I. Crouch (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on the Sociology of Languages of American Women (pp. 53–62). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D., & Hallinan, M. T. (1978). Sex differences in children’s friendships. American Sociological Review, 43, 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S. L., Dovidi, J. P., & Brown, C. E. (1992). The look of power: Gender differences and similarities. In C. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality, (pp. 50–80). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filardo, E. K. (1996). Gender patterns in African American and white adolescents’ social interactions in same-race, mixed-sex groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S., & Oliker, S. J. (1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle. Social Forces, 62, 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. M. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems 25, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. M. (1983). Interaction: The work women do. In B. Thorne, C. Kramaraea, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perpsectives (pp. 89–101). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173–196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, R. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. (1986). Effects of dominance and sex on leader selection in dyadic work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59,237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (1996). Status in same-gender and mixed-gender police dyads: Effects on personality attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 350–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T. (1974). The structure of positive sentiment. New York: American Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T, & Kubitschek, W. N. (1988). The effects of individual and structural characteristics on intransitivity in social networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T., & Kubitschek, W. N. (1990). The formation of intransitive friendships. Social Forces, 62,124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding Events. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1989). Centrality and innovativeness: Effects of social network position on innovation involvement. Unpublished dissertation, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1990). Women’s access to informal networks at work: An intergroup perspective. Paper presented at Academy of Management meetings, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1997). New directions in social network research in gender and organizational careers. In S. Jackson & C. Cooper (Eds.), Creating tomorrow’s organizations: A handbook for future research in organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D. & Clarke, S. (1988). Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 231–280). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D., & Drakich, J. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281–312). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1994). Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinante conversations. American Sociological Review, 59, 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., Clay-Warner, J., & Funk, S. J. (1996). Effects of authority structures and gender on interaction in same-sex task groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., & Crawford, G. (1980). Work and network: The relationship of the social circle to the economic action of poor men. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meetings, New York, August 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, P. E., Crosby, F, & Wong-McCarthy, W. J. (1980). Androgyny, dyadic compatibility and conversational behavior. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 115–119). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communications 47, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P, (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women’s place. Language in Society, 2, 45–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, S. (1973). The development of transitive structure in children’s interpersonal relations. Behavioral Science 12, 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J. (1978). Sex differences in the complexity of children’s play and games. American Sociological Review, 43, 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E. (1985). Sex and social influence: A meta-analysis guided by theory. In J. Berger & M. Zeldtich (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 406–429). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 196–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 51–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V. (1992). Network diversity, substructures and opportunities for contact. In C. Calhoun, M. Meyer, & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Structures of power and constraint: Papers in honor of Peter M. Blau. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. R., Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D. & Gale, W. S. (1977). Women’s language: Uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? Sex Roles 3, 545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1982). Women and weak ties: Differences by sex in the size of voluntary organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 883–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 51, 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, B. F., & Weitzel-O’Neil, P. A.. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1986). Pathways in the workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1975). Isolation in organizations: Alienation from authority, control and expressive relations. Administrative Science Quarterly 20, 260–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Labovitz, S., & Fry, L. (1975). Inequities in the organizational experiences of women and men: Resources, vested interests and discrimination. Social Forces, 54, 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch, A. R., McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1997). Gender, children and social contact: The effects of childrearing for men and women. American Sociological Review, 63, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1985). Toward a model of members’ methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 14, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, P. M. (1992). Men’s friendships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, L., & Spence, J. T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. ( 1992). Friendships between women: A critical review. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, D., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1996). Don’t change the subject: Gender and topic transitions in task-oriented groups. Paper presented to the American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliker, S. (1989). Best friends and marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, J. A., & Martin, R. R. (1978). The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction. Sex Roles, 4, 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47,76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1992). Gender, interaction and inequality. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1993). Gender, status, and the social psychology of expectations. In P. England (Ed.), Theory ongender/feminism on theory (pp. 175–198). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C., & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72, 1051–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, D., & Nesshoever, W. (1987). Individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies: A further study. British Journal of Social Psychology 26, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, D., & Schumaker, A. (1983). Effects of individual differences on dyadic conversational strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 700–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, F., & Sherblom J. (1987). Qualification in male language as influenced by age and gender of conversational partner. Communication Reports, 4, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, D. (1987). The bonds of men: Problems and possibilities in close male relationships. In H. Bred (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men’s studies (pp. 213–239). Boston: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussion: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review 54, 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Heise, D. R. (1988). Analyzing social interaction: Research advances in affect control theory. New York: Gordon & Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & McPherson, M. (1992). You are who you know: A network perspective on gender. In P. England (Ed.), Theory an gender/feminism on theory (pp. 223–254). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Robinson, D. (1992). Gender and conversational dynamics. In C. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Corder, J., & Markham, W. T. (1982). Sex and power in the federal bureaucracy: A comparative analysis of male and female supervisors. Work and Occupations, 9, 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. (1997). Status and marital Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 185–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1996). Gender, control and interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59, 193–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. (1956). Sex role differentiation injury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 468–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. (1989). Covert intimacy: Closeness in men’s friendships. In B. J. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1983). When is an overlap not an interruption? One component of conversational style. In R. Di Pietro, W. Frawley, & A. Wedel (Eds.), The First Delaware Symposium on Language Studies (pp. 119–129). Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimboli, C., & Walker, M. B. (1984). Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. G., Ford, R. S., & Ford, T. W. (1986). Can gender inequalities be reduced? American Sociological Review, 51, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (1994). Men, women, and friendship: What they say, what they do. Gender and Society, 8, 246–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1985). Domestic work, paid work and net work. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Ed.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 159–191). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, D. K., & Anderson, L. R. (1984). Emergent leadership as a function of sex and task type. Sex Roles, 11, 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1993). Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological approach. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 151–174). New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9, 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Garcia, A. (1988). Conversational shift work: A study of topical transitions between men and women. Social Problems, 35, 551–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C.,& Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. A., & Verdi, A. F. (1992). Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artifact? Sex Roles, 27, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, B. (1980). Culture and social behavior: A model for the development of social behavior. Ethos, 8, 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. (1985), Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles, 12, 587–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1987). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Sex differences in interaction style in task groups. In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 97–121). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. H. (1988). Interpreting research on gender differences in friendship: A case for moderation and a plea for caution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, E. M., Tjosvold, D., & Draguns, J. G. (1983). Effects of sex-linked situations and sex composition on cooperation and style of interaction. Sex Roles, 9, 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305

    Cecilia L. Ridgeway

  2. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721

    Lynn Smith-Lovin

Authors
  1. Cecilia L. Ridgeway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn Smith-Lovin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ridgeway, C.L., Smith-Lovin, L. (2006). Gender and Interaction. In: Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36218-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation