Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, J. D. (1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 673–702.
Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge Transfer from MIT. Management Science 48(1), 44–60.
Anselin, L, Varga, A. and Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–48.
Anselin, L., Varga, A. and Acs., Z. (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science 79(4), 435–43.
Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1996a). Innovation clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), 253–73.
Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1996b). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 63(3), 630–40.
Audretsch, D. and Stephan, P. (1996). Company-Scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652.
Black, G. (forthcoming). The geography of small firm innovation. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cohen, W. Nelson, R. and Walch, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
Deng, Z., Lev B. and Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20–32.
Feldman, M. and Audretsch, D. (1999). Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization, and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43, 409–429.
Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–70.
Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of innovation: technological change in 20 th -century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Narin, F., Hamilton K. and Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–30.
National Research Council (1995). Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (1999). Measuring the science and engineering enterprise: Priorities for the division of science resources studies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Board (2002). Science and engineering indicators—2002. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation/Science Resources Statistics (2001). Academic research and development expenditures: Fiscal year 1999. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Powell, W., Koput, K., Smith-Doerr, L. and Owen-Smith, J. (1999). Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 129–159.
Sanderson, A., Dugoni, A., Hoffer, T. and Myers, S. (2000). Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 1999. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
Stephan, P. (2002). Using human resource data to illuminate innovation and research utilization. In S. Merril and M. McGreary (Eds.). Using human resource data to track innovation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Zucker, L. and Darby, M. (1997). The economists’ case for biomedical research: Academic scientist-entrepreneurs and commercial success in biotechnology. In: C. Barfield and B. Smith, (Eds.). The future of biomedical research. Washington, D.C. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research and The Brookings Institute.
Zucker, L., Darby, M. and Armstrong, J. (1998a). Intellectual capital and the firm: The technology of geographically localized knowledge spillovers. Economic Inquiry, 36, 65–86.
Zucker, L., Darby M. and Brewer, M. (1998b.) Intellectual capital and the birth of the U.S. biotechnology enterprise. American Economic Review, 88(1), 290–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stephan, P.E., Sumell, A.J., Adams, J.D., Black, G.C. (2005). Firm Placements of New PhDs: Implications for Knowledge Transfer. In: Fornahl, D., Zellner, C., Audretsch, D.B. (eds) The Role of Labour Mobility and Informal Networks for Knowledge Transfer. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23140-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23140-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-23141-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-23140-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)