Geography of Happiness and Well-being

In recent decades, there's been a growing scientific interest in measuring subjective well-being (happiness or life satisfaction) in various domains. The UN even adopted a resolution in 2012 urging governments to enhance the well-being of their citizens. This focus extends beyond national governments to regional and local authorities. Notably, subjective well-being ranks high in public attention, evident in media rankings and its significance in the OECD Better Life Index. The 2020 European Strategy emphasizes promoting subjective well-being research. However, there's a gap in understanding the geography of well-being, both locally and regionally.

This special issues focuses on two themes: (1) unraveling the urban paradox and (2) advances in geography of happiness.

1. Unraveling the Urban Paradox: Despite cities being perceived as enriching and beneficial, higher urbanization is generally associated with lower well-being in the Western world. The debate questions why people migrate to cities despite this lower reported happiness. The causes are complex, involving negative agglomeration externalities and the selective migration of certain demographics. Urban problems like crime and congestion may contribute to lower well-being, while selective migration patterns may attract happier individuals to smaller cities or villages.

2. Advances in Geography of Happiness: Various well-being indicators exist, like the OECD Better Life Index, UNDP Human Development Index, UN World Happiness Index, and others. However, these often lack micro-geography specifics. The second part of the special issue explores place-specific elements influencing well-being at the local or regional level. Papers will cover factors such as access to green spaces, inequality, and social capital.

Overall, the special issue aims to contribute to understanding the geographical nuances of subjective well-being and its implications for policy and urban planning.