Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Ecosystem Services Framework

  • Chapter
People, Forests, and Change

Abstract

Ecosystem services are the full range of social, ecological, and economic benefits that people obtain from nature (Millennium Assessment 2003; Smith et al. 2011). These services include both biophysical (e.g., water, food, and fiber) and intangible (e.g., cultural or health) benefits. The concept originated in ecological economists’ attempts to assign monetary valuations to the goods and services humans receive from naturally functioning ecosystems, so that the full array of direct and indirect benefits are captured in environmental policy, management, and decision making (Westman 1977). The importance and value of ecosystem services are being recognized internationally (Farley and Costanza 2010; Muradian et al. 2010), as illustrated by the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES 2012), which is currently supported by 124 nations. Many US state and federal natural resource agencies have adopted policies that include analyses of ecosystem services in planning and decision making. The US Environmental Protection Agency, US Geological Survey, and US National Park Service all have new initiatives regarding the identification and mapping of ecosystem services. Specific to national forestlands, the US Forest Service’s new planning rule (USDA 2012) requires all 175 national forests to report key ecosystem services for forest plan assessments and revisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Asah, S. T., D. J. Blahna, and C. M. Ryan. 2012. Involving forest communities in identifying and constructing ecosystem services: Millennium Assessment and place specificity. Journal of Forestry 110:149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asah, S. T., A. D. Guerry, D. J. Blahna, and J. J. Lawler. 2014. Perception, acquisition, and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications. Ecosystem Services 10:180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad, K. J., F. Villa, D. Batker, J. Harrison-Cox, B. Boigt, and G. W. Johnson. 2014. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society 19(2):64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06523-190264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blahna, D. J., and S. Yonts-Shepard. 1990. Preservation or use? Confronting public issues in forest planning and decision making. Chap. 13. Pages 161–176 in Outdoor recreation policy: Pleasure and preservation. Edited by J. Hutcheson, F. Noe, and R. Snow. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael, N. E., A. M. Freeman, R. J. Kopp, P. R. Portney, and V. K. Smith. 2000. On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science and Technology 34:1384–1389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J., and S. Banzhaf. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 69:616– 626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champ, P. A., K. J. Boyle, and T. C. Brown. 2003. A primer on nonmarket valuation. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. M. A., A. D. Guerry, P. Balvanera, and 14 coauthors. 2012b. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62:744–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. M. A., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012a. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74: 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. N., and G. H. Stankey. 2006. Integrated research in natural resources: The key role of problem framing. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-678. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, and 10 coauthors. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. C., A. Juhar, A. Arnberger, and 19 coauthors. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:8812–8819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, R., E. Weidner, and N. Smith. 2014. Integrating ecosystem services into U.S. Forest Service programs and operations. In Federal resource management and ecosystem services guidebook. Durham, NC: National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Duke University. Available at: www.nespguidebook.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/FRMES-CE-10-FULL-PDF.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management, and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7:260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada, J., D. Blahna, R. Krannich, and M. Brunson. 1998. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 8:891–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., and R. Costanza. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics 69:2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., R. K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68:643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, T., J. Bowles, N. Smith, and P. Calligiuri. 2014. An ecosystem services approach to management of a complex landscape: The Marsh project. Case 7 in Federal resource management and ecosystem services guidebook. Durham, NC: National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Duke University. http://www.nespguidebook.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/FRMES-CE-7-FULL-PDF.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES (Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2012. Resolution on the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. http://www.ipbes.net/images/Resolution%20establishing%20IPBES_2012.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUFRO (International Union of Forest Research Organizations). 2015. Contribution of biodiversity to ecosystem services in managed forests. http://www.iufro.org/science/task-forces/biodiversity/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, H. L., and D. J. Blahna. 2006. Achieving integrative, collaborative ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 20:1373–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, J. D., and M. J. Mazzotta. 2012. Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services in the management of public lands. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-865. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, J. D., M. J. Mazzotta, T. A. Spies, and M. E. Harmon. 2013. Applying the ecosystem services concept to public land management. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 42:139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Introduction and conceptual framework. Chap. 1 in Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, and P. H. May. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69:1202– 1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahlik, A. M., M. E. Kentula, M. S. Fennessey, and D. H. Landers. 2012. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological Economics 77:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Ecosystem Services Partnership (NESP). 2016. Federal resource management and ecosystem services guidebook. https://nespguidebook.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penaluna, B. E., D. H. Olson, R. L. Flitcroft, M. Weber, J. R. Bellmore, S. M. Wondzell, J. B. Dunham, S. L. Johnson, and G. H. Reeves. 2016. Aquatic biodiversity in forests: A weak link in ecological and ecosystem service resilience. Biodiversity and Conservation. doi:10.1007/s10531-016-1148-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M. G., R. Molina, C. H. Flather, R. S. Holthausen, R. L. Johnson, B. G. Marcot, D. H. Olson, J. D. Peine, C. H. Sieg, and C. S. Swanson. 2007. A process for selection and implementation of conservation approaches. Chap. 12. Pp. 334–362 in Conservation of rare or little-known species. Edited by M. G. Raphael and R. Molina. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M., G. G. Singh, K. Benessaiah, J. R. Bernhardt, J. Levine, H. Nelson, N. J. Turner, B. Norton, J. Tam, and K. M. A. Chan. 2013. Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience 63:536–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, T. H., G. C. Dailey, P. R. Ehrlich, and C. D. Michener. 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:12579–12582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ringold, P. L., J. Alegria, R. L. Czaplewski, B. S. Mulder, T. Tolle, and K. Burnett. 1996. Adaptive monitoring design for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:745–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringold, P. L., J. Boyd, D. Landers, and M. Weber. 2013. What data should we collect? A framework for identifying indicators of ecosystem contributions to human well-being. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J. 2015. Have ecosystem services been oversold? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30:641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., R. Deal, J. Kline, D. Blahna, T. Patterson, T. Spies, and K. Bennett. 2011. Ecosystem services as a framework for forest stewardship: Deschutes National Forest overview. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-852. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tallis, H., P. Kareiva, M. Marvier, and A. Chang. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:9457–9464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. P., B. G. Marcot, F. R. Thompson, S. McNulty, L. A. Fisher, M. C. Runge, D. Cleaves, M. Tomosy. 2013. The science of decision-making: Applications for sustainable forest and grassland management in the National Forest System. General Technical Report WO-GTR-88. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NECSCS): Framework design and policy application. EPA-800-R-15-002. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service). 2012. National Forest System land management planning. Final rule and record of decision. 36 CFR Part 219. Federal Register 77:21162–21267. http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5362536.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service). 2013. National Forest System land management planning directives. Federal Register 78(39):13316–13319. http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5411235.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. and D. W. Bromley. 1994. Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26:129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman, W. E. 1977. How much are nature’s services worth? Science 197:960– 964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. P., B. Jiang, A. P. Kinzig, K. N. Lee, and Z. Ouyang. 2015. Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecology Letters 18:108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Dale J. Blahna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stanley T. Asah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert L. Deal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, SW Jefferson Way 3200, 97331, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Deanne H. Olson  & Beatrice Van Horne  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blahna, D.J., Asah, S.T., Deal, R.L. (2017). An Ecosystem Services Framework. In: Olson, D.H., Van Horne, B. (eds) People, Forests, and Change. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-768-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation