Advertisement

Challenges and Approaches for Integrating Climate Science into Federal Land Management

  • S. Thomas Olliff
  • Andrew J. Hansen
Chapter
  • 367 Downloads

Abstract

Although private lands are prevalent, federally managed public lands—those managed by the US Forest Service, the National Park Service (NPS), the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—are uniquely positioned to coordinate climate adaptation across their lands and with other landowners and stewards. The federal government manages almost 30 percent of the land in the United States, nearly 650 million acres, including 401 units of the National Park System and 155 national forests and grasslands (GAO 2013).

Keywords

Vulnerability Assessment Climate Change Adaptation Adaptation Option National Park Service Conservation Target 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bingham B, Britten M, Garrett L, Latham P, Legg K (2010) Natural Resource Report NPS/IMR/NRR—2011/285. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO, Enhanced Monitoring to Better Address Rapid Climate Change in High-Elevation Parks: A Multi-network StrategyGoogle Scholar
  2. Chambers N, Tabor G, Converse Y, Olliff T, Finn S, Sojda R, Bischke S (2013) The Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative Strategic Conservation Framework., http://greatnorthernlcc.org/sites/default/files/documents/gnlcc_framework_final_small.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang T, Hansen AJ, Piekielek N (2014) Patterns and variability of projected bioclimatic habitat for Pinus albicaulis in the Greater Yellowstone area. PLOS ONE 9(11), e111669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters 8:024024. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience, Climate and Natural Resources Working Group. 2014. Priority Agenda for Enhancing the Climate Resilience of America’s Natural Resources. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/enhancing_climate_resilience_of_americas_natural_resources.pdf.
  6. Cross MS, Zavaleta ES, Bachelet D, Brooks ML, Enquist CAF, Fleishman E, Graumlich LJ, Groves CR, Hannah L, Hansen L, Hayward G, Koopman M, Lawler JJ, Malcolm J, Nordgren J, Petersen B, Rowland EL, Scott D, Shafer SL, Shaw MR, Tabor GM (2012) The Adaptation for Conservation Targets (ACT) framework: A tool for incorporating climate change into natural resource management. Environmental Management 50:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edgelow C (2005) Communicating Organizational Change. Lost Creek Press, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  8. Executive Office of the President (2013) The President’s Climate Action Plan. The White House, June, Washington, DC, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. GAO (US Government Accountability Office) (2009) Climate Change Adaptation: Strategic Federal Planning Could Help Government Officials Make More Informed Decisions. GAO-10-113. GAO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. GAO (US Government Accountability Office) (2011) Climate Change: Improvements Needed to Clarify National Priorities and Better Align Them with Federal Funding Decisions. GAO-11-317. GAO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. GAO (US Government Accountability Office) (2013) Climate Change: Various Efforts Are Under Way at Key Natural Resource Management Agencies. GAO-13-253. GAO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Garfin G, Hartmann H, Crescioni-Benitez M, Ely T, Keck J, Kendrick J, Legg K, Wise J, Graumlich L, Overpeck J (2011) Climate Change Training Needs Assessment for the National Park Service Intermountain Region. University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick P, Stein BA, Edelson N (eds) (2011) Scanning the Conservation Horizon: A Guide to Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment. Draft. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez P (2011) Science for natural resource management under climate change. Issues in Science and Technology 27(4):65–74Google Scholar
  15. Halofsky JE, Peterson D, Marcinkowski KW (2015) Climate Change Adaptation in United States Federal Natural Resource Science and Management Agencies: A Synthesis., USGCRP Climate Change Adaptation Interagency Working GroupGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen A, Goetz JS, Melton F, Monahan B, Gross J, Olliff T, Theobald D (2013) NASA Applied Sciences Initial Assessment Report: Using NASA Resources to Inform Climate and Land Use Adaptation: Ecological Forecasting, Vulnerability Assessment, and Evaluation of Management Options across Two US DOI Landscape Conservation Cooperatives., http://www.montana.edu/lccvp/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen LJ, Hoffman JR (2011) Climate Savvy: Adapting Conservation and Resource Management to a Changing World. EcoAdapt, Bainbridge Island, WACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jean C, Schrag AM, Bennetts RE, Daley R, Crowe EA, O’Ney S (2005) Vital Signs Monitoring Plan for the Greater Yellowstone Network. National Park Service, Greater Yellowstone Network, Bozeman, MTGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemieux CJ, Scott DJ (2011) Changing climate, challenging choices: Identifying and evaluating climate change adaptation options for protected areas management in Ontario, Canada. Environmental Management 48(4):675–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemieux CJ, Thompson JL, Dawson J, Schuster RM (2013) Natural resource manager perceptions of agency performance on climate change. Environmental Management 114:178–189Google Scholar
  22. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Howe P (2012) Global Warming’s Six Americas in September 2012. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and George Mason University, Center for Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CT, http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Six-Americas-September-2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
  23. McKinney M, Scarlett L, Kemmis D (2010) Large Landscape Conservation: A Strategic Framework for Policy and Action. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, http://www.lincolninst.eduGoogle Scholar
  24. National Fish, Wildlife and Plants Climate Adaptation Partnership (2012) National Fish, Wildlife and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Council on Environmental Quality, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, http://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/pdf/NFWPCAS-Final.pdfGoogle Scholar
  25. National Park Service (2011) A Call to Action: Preparing for a Second Century of Stewardship and Engagement., August 25, http://www.nps.gov/calltoaction/PDF/C2A_2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
  26. Northern Rockies Fire Sciences Network. 2011. Obstacles to using research: A survey of fire and fuels managers, resource managers, and line managers in the Northern Rockies. http://nrfirescience.org/your-input/needsassessment/survey/obstacles.
  27. Olliff, S. T., P. Benjamin, L. Chan, J. Cowley, N. Fisichelli, W. Monahan, L. Meyer, and T. Whittington. In review. National Park Service Intermountain Region Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan. Natural Resource Report NPS/IMRO/NRR—2015. Fort Collins, CO: National Park Service.Google Scholar
  28. Olliff T, Plumb G, Kershner J, Whitlock C, Hansen A, Cross M, Bischke S (2010) A science agenda for the Greater Yellowstone area: Responding to landscape impacts from climate change, land use change, and invasive species. Yellowstone Science 18(2)Google Scholar
  29. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovation. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitz OJ, Lawler JJ, Beier P, Groves C, Knight G, Boyce DA Jr, Bulluck J, Johnston KM, Klein ML, Muller K, Pierce DJ, Singleton WR, Strittholt JR, Theobald DM, Trombulak SC, Trainor A (2015) Conserving biodiversity: Practical guidance about climate change adaptation approaches in support of land-use planning. Natural Areas Journal 35(1):190–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shafer CL (2014) From non-static vignettes to unprecedented change: The U.S. National Park System, climate impacts and animal dispersal. Environmental Science & Policy 40:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stein BA, Glick P, Edelson N, Staudt A (eds) (2014) Climate-Smart Conservation: Putting Adaptation Principles into Practice. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Thrasher B, Xiong J, Wang W, Melton F, Michaelis A, Nemani R (2013) Downscaled climate projections suitable for resource management. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 94(37):321–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. USDA Forest Service (2012) National Forest System Land Management Planning: Final rule and record of decision. Federal Register 77(68)Google Scholar
  35. White PJ, Garrott RA, Olliff ST (2009) Science in Yellowstone: Contributions, limitations, and recommendations. In: Garrott RA, White PJ, Watson FGR (eds) The Ecology of Large Mammals in Central Yellowstone: Sixteen Years of Integrated Field Studies. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 671–688Google Scholar
  36. Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro, and C. D. Shapiro. 2009. Adaptive Management: The U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Guide. Washington, DC: Adaptive Management Working Group, US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  37. Yellowstone Center for Resources. 2011. Yellowstone National Park Vital Signs Report. http://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/management/upload/vitalsigns2-2.pdf.

Copyright information

© Island Press 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Thomas Olliff
  • Andrew J. Hansen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations