Abstract
Urban form, or the shape that a settlement takes on the ground, is key to describing and understanding any urban region. A region's urban form not only underlays its character and distinctiveness but has a major effect on its sustainability and livability. Its overall size and density, the location of major employment and residential areas, and the fine-grained texture of land uses in the different precincts of the region all affect how the region works. Urban form influences how urbanites get from place to place, their access to work and other life opportunities, the availability of housing of different types, and the overall prosperity of the region.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
- 1.
Joel Garreau, Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (New York: Anchor Books, 1992).
- 2.
Northwest Environment Watch and Smart Growth BC, Sprawl and Smart Growth in Greater Vancouver: A Comparison of Vancouver, British Columbia, with Seattle, Washington (Seattle, WA: Northwest Environment Watch, 2002).
- 3.
The relationship between density thresholds and transportation modes can be found in works such as Peter W. G. Newman and Jeffrey R. Kenworthy, Cities and Automobile Dependence (Brookfield. VT: Gower Technical Press, 1989).
- 4.
D. Hernandez, M. Lister, and C. Suarez, Location Efficiency and Housing Type: Boiling It Down to BTUs (Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2011).
- 5.
Reid Ewing and Robert Cervero, “Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis,” Transportation Research Record 1780 (2001): 87–114.
- 6.
John Miron, “Urban Sprawl in Canada and America: Just How Dissimilar?,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, New Orleans, LA, March 2003.
- 7.
Zachary T. Taylor, “The Politics of Metropolitan Development: Institutions, Interests, and Ideas in the Making of Urban Governance in the United States and Canada, 1800–2000” (PhD diss., Graduate Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 2015).
- 8.
US Census Bureau, 2013 Housing Profile: United States. American Housing Survey Factsheets, May 2015; Statistics Canada, 2011 Canadian Census.
- 9.
K. M. Leyden, “Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighborhoods,” American Journal of Public Health 93, no. 9 (2003): 1546–51.
- 10.
L. Frank, J. Sallis, T. Conway, J. Chapman, B. Saelens, and W. Bachman, “Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Walkability Associations with Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality,” Journal of the American Planning Association 72, no. 1 (2006): 75–87.
- 11.
Gil Tal and Susan Handy, “Measuring Non-motorized Accessibility and Connectivity in a Robust Pedestrian Network,” Final Research Report So2-2, UC Davis Sustainable Transportation Center.
- 12.
- 13.
Paul Torrens and Marina Alberti, Measuring Sprawl (London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, 2000).
- 14.
Pierre Filion, Trudi Bunting, Kathleen McSpurren, and Alan Tse, “Canada-U.S. Metropolitan Density Patterns: Zonal Convergence and Divergence,” Urban Geography 25, no. 1 (2004): 42–65.
- 15.
Filion et al., “Canada-U.S. Metropolitan Density Patterns.”
- 16.
Peter Mieszkowski and Edwin Mills, “The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (1993): 135–47.
- 17.
Michael Lewyn, “Sprawl in Canada and The United States” (draft LLM thesis, University of Toronto, 2010).
- 18.
Kim England and John Mercer, “Canadian Cities in Continental Context: Global and Continental Perspectives on Canadian Urban Development,” in Canadian Cities in Transition, 3rd ed., eds. Trudi Bunting and Pierre Filion (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2006), 24–39.
- 19.
Yong Eun Shin, V. R. Vuchic, and E. Christian Bruun, “Land Consumption Impacts of a Transportation System on a City: An Analysis,” Transportation Research Record 2110 (2009): 69–77.
- 20.
Todd Litman, Evaluating Transportation Land Use Impacts (Victoria, BC: Victoria Transport Policy Institute 2015).
- 21.
Robert A. Beauregard, When America Became Suburban (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006).
- 22.
Peter W. G. Newman and Jeffrey R. Kenworthy, Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence (Washington DC: Island Press, 1999).
- 23.
Reid Ewing, “Characteristics, Causes and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review,” Environmental and Urban Studies 21, no. 2 (1994): 1–15.
- 24.
Barry Edmonston, Michael A. Goldberg, and John Mercer, 1985. “Urban Form in Canada and the United States: An Examination of Urban Density Gradients,” Urban Studies 22, no. 3 (1985): 209–17.
- 25.
Tamim Raad, “The Car in Canada: A Study of Factors Influencing Automobile Dependence in Canada’s Seven Largest Cities 1961–1991” (master’s thesis, University of British Colombia, 1998).
- 26.
Peter Newman and Jeffrey Kenworthy, The End of Automobile Dependence: How Cities Are Moving beyond Car-Based Planning (Washington, DC: Island Press, 2015).
- 27.
The road measure includes all roads in each of the sample cities but does not account for variations in the number of lanes.
- 28.
Robert Cervero et al., Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experience, Challenges, and Prospects, prepared for the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004).
- 29.
Newman and Kenworthy, The End of Automobile Dependence.
- 30.
John Pucher and Ralph Buehler, “Why Canadians Cycle More Than Americans: A Comparative Analysis of Bicycling Trends and Policies,” Transport Policy 13 (2006): 265–79.
- 31.
John Pucher and Ralph Buehler, “International Overview,” in City Cycling, eds. John Pucher and Ralph Buehler (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012), 9–30.
- 32.
M. Winters, G. Davidson, D. Kao, and K. Teschke, “Motivators and Deterrents of Bicycling: Comparing Influences on Decisions to Ride,” Transportation 38 (2011): 153–68.
- 33.
John Pucher and Ralph Buehler, eds., City Cycling (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).
- 34.
John Pucher and Ralph Buehler, 2007. “Cycling in Canada and the United States: Why Canadians Are So Far Ahead,” Plan (Spring/Summer 2007): 13–17.
- 35.
P. Jacobsen, “Safety in Numbers: More Walkers and Bicyclists, Safer Walking and Bicycling,” Injury Prevention 9 (2003): 205–9.
- 36.
Paul Schimek, for one, has dismissed this factor as an explanation for differences in the mix of housing stock in the countries, noting that detached housing trends did not track income changes over time. See Paul Schimek, “Automobile and Public Transit Use in the United States and Canada: Comparison of Postwar Trends,” Transportation Research Record 1521 (1996): 3–11.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Ray Tomalty and Alan Mallach
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tomalty, R., Mallach, A. (2015). Differences in Urban Form and Transportation Systems. In: America’s Urban Future. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-597-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-597-7_5
Publisher Name: Island Press, Washington, DC
Print ISBN: 978-1-59726-255-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-61091-597-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)