Skip to main content

Monitoring and Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • 1793 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

Monitoring has one single important function: to provide information to enable an evaluation of the project as it is developing. Monitoring data should evoke some type of response, even if it is a “do nothing” response. This response will be an informed one and, ideally, one reached by considering all of the various factors affecting your project. Making intelligent decisions concerning any action on a restoration project requires a sound monitoring report.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Refrences

  • Bonham, Charles D. 1989. Measurements of Terrestrial Vegetation. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell, Andre F. 1999. “Restoration of Riverine Forest at Hall Branch of Phosphate-Mined Land, Florida.” Restoration Ecology 7:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Caryl L., Daniel W. Salzer, and John W. Willoughby. 1998. Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations. Denver, CO: Bureau of Land Management, National Business Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga, Caryl L., Daniel W. Salzer, John W. Willoughby, and James P. Gibbs. 2001. Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Evelyn A., John A. Harrington, and Stephen B. Glass. 2012. Introduction to Restoration Ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentula, Mary E., Robert P. Brooks, Stephanie E. Gwin, Cindy C. Holland, Arthur D. Sherman, and Jean C. Sifneos. 1993. An Approach to Improving Decision Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation. Boca Raton, FL: C.K. Smoley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, James R., and Ellen W. Chu. 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Charles J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, Patricia N., Beatrice Van Horne, Julie K. Roth, William J. Zielinski, Michelle M. McKenzie, Theodore J. Weller, Floyd W. Weckerly, and Christina Vojta. 2006. Multiple Species Inventory and Monitoring Technical Guide. General Technical Report WO-73. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis, Richard, and Nick Salafsky. 1998. Measures of Success: Designing, Managing and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Michael L. 2009. Restoring Wildlife: Ecological Concepts and Practical Applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, William J., ed. 1996. Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, Thomas R. E., and Peter A. Henderson. 2000. Ecological Methods. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongway, David J., and John A. Ludwig. 2011. Restoring Disturbed Landscapes: Putting Principles into Practice. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 John Rieger, John Stanley, and Ray Traynor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rieger, J., Stanley, J., Traynor, R. (2014). Monitoring and Evaluation. In: Project Planning and Management for Ecological Restoration. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-566-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics