Skip to main content

Slowing the Race by Slowing the Attack

  • Chapter
Chasing the Red Queen
  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

Though it may seem counterintuitive, we have seen that the more effective a pesticide is, the more likely it is to promote resistance. As a rule, the more intense the killing agent (i.e., pesticide), the greater the stress on the target organism and the greater the selective pressure favoring existing genetic variation that protects the target organism from that stress. This is no more than an extension of Darwin’s five postulates outlining the process of natural selection (as was discussed in chapter 3): most individuals in every population die before they reproduce, and those that survive have some adaptive trait that reduces the environmental stress below lethal levels and allows them to live long enough to reproduce. Adaptation is simply the rapid spread throughout a population of a genetic mutation that promotes survival in the face of the most potent stress. Thus, the greater the proportion of a population that a pesticide kills, the faster the resistant mutant allele will come to dominate the subsequent population, because most of the offspring of the survivors will possess the mutation. The Red Queen governs the process and is capable of shifting into hyperdrive when selective forces, such as pesticides, are very intense. The only way to beat the system using pesticides as the only environmental stress is to eliminate all individuals so that not a single resistant gene survives the chemical assault.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    J. K. Norsworthy et al., “Reducing the Risks of Herbicide Resistance: Best Management Practices and Recommendations,” Weed Science 60 (2012): 31–62.

  2. 2.

    S. O. Duke and S. B. Powles, “Glyphosate: A Once-in-a-Century Herbicide,” Pest Management Science 64 (2008): 319–25.

  3. 3.

    Even Rachel Carson (Silent Spring, 1964) suggested the general rule: “‘Spray as little as you possibly can’ rather than ‘Spray to the limit of your capacity.’”

  4. 4.

    See: Phillips McDougall (company website), www.phillipsmcdougall.com/ for estimates of time to market and costs of development; see also: S. O. Duke, “Why Have No New Herbicide Modes of Action Appeared in Recent Years?” Pest Management Science 68 (2012): 505–12.

  5. 5.

    Insecticide Resistance Action Committee International MoA Working Group, IRAC website, 2012, www.irac-online.org/.

  6. 6.

    Weed Science Society of America, “Summary of Herbicide Mechanism of Action,” 2011, http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/WSSA-Mechanism-of-Action.pdf. WSSA and HRAC lists of MOA are equivalent.

  7. 7.

    G. B. Frisvold, T. M. Hurley, and P. D. Mitchell, “Adoption of Best Management Practices to Control Weed Resistance by Corn, Cotton, and Soybean Growers,” Agbioforum 12 (2009): 370–81.

  8. 8.

    See, for example: S. Ossowski et al., “The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Science 327 (2010): 92–94. This paper estimates that mutations are inherited at the rate of two per individual for this species.

  9. 9.

    See, for example: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program, “UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Cotton,” Publication 3444, 2013, www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/selectnewpest.cotton.html: “Using selective insecticides and miticides to kill the target pest without killing natural enemies helps maximize as well as integrate chemical and biological controls.”

  10. 10.

    See: Phillips McDougall company website (www.phillipsmcdougall.com/) for further information regarding the challenges and costs of bringing new agricultural chemical products to market.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Andy Dyer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dyer, A. (2014). Slowing the Race by Slowing the Attack. In: Chasing the Red Queen. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-520-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics