Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is Observation-Based Ecology Scientific?

  • Chapter
Observation and Ecology

  • 1176 Accesses

Abstract

Questions and criticisms that arise around observational approaches boil down to one fundamental question: “Is this really science?” This question could be asked of any kind of research, but because observational approaches have been out of the scientific mainstream for a long time, and because they invite so many nonscientists as well as investigators from the so-called soft sciences to be part of the life sciences, it is frequently directed at observational studies. So now that these kinds of studies are being integrated into science, the natural follow-up to the fundamental question becomes “Are observational approaches scientific?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Buck, Carol. “Popper’s Philosophy for Epidemiologists.” International Journal of Epidemiology 4, no. 3 (1975): 159 – 72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, John R. “‘Strong Inference.’” Science 146, no. 3642 (1964): 347 – 53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. “Competition Theory, Hypothesis-Testing, and Other Community Ecological Buzzwords.” American Naturalist 122, no. 5 (1983): 626 – 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elner, R. W., and R. L. Vadas. “Inference in Ecology — The Sea-Urchin Phenomenon in the Northwestern Atlantic.” American Naturalist 136, no. 1 (1990): 108 – 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Jacob. “On the Practice of Ecology.” Journal of Ecology 83 (1995): 153 – 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garst, J., N. L. Kerr, S. E. Harris, and L. A. Sheppard. “Satisficing in Hypothesis Generation.” American Journal of Psychology 115, no. 4 (2002): 475 – 500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, Katharine A., ed. Breaking Through: Essays, Journals and Travelogues of Edward F. Ricketts. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, George B. “The Pleasure of Observing.” In Field Notes on Science and Nature, edited by Michael R. Canfield, 19 – 32. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. “Basic Inferences of Scientific Reasoning, Argumentation, and Discovery.” Science Education 94, no. 2 (2010): 336 – 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., and C. R. Allen. “Adaptive Inference for Distinguishing Credible from Incredible Patterns in Nature.” Ecosystems 5, no. 4 (2002): 319 – 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M. “Are Ecology and Evolutionary Biology ‘Soft’ Sciences?” Annales Zoologici Fennici 39, no. 2 (2002): 87 – 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, Paul K., and Enric Sala. “Natural History: The Sense of Wonder, Creativity, and Progress in Ecology.” Scientia Marina 65, no. Suppl. 2 (2001): 199 – 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, D. W. “Causal Inference in Environmental Impact Studies.” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17, no. 3 (1998): 367 – 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, Robert C., and Steven R. Hare. “Decadal-Scale Regime Shifts in the Large Marine Ecosystems of the North-East Pacific: A Case for Historical Science.” Fisheries Oceanography 3, no. 4 (1994): 279 – 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, A. M. “Concept-Centered Versus Organism-Centered Biology.” American Zoologist 29, no. 3 (1989): 1177 – 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, James F., and Arthur E. Dunham. “On Hypothesis Testing in Ecology and Evolution.” American Naturalist 122, no. 5 (1983): 620 – 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., and J. A. Buchanan. “The Weaknesses of Strong Inference.” Behavior and Philosophy 29, no. 1 (2001): 1 – 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., and D. Ludwig. “The Limits of Applied Ecological Research.” Ecological Applications 3, no. 4 (1993): 550 – 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, David G., Richard L. Veit, Sarah G. Allen, Larry B. Spear, and Peter Pyle. “Variations in Marine Bird Communities of the California Current 1986 – 1994.” California Cooperative Fisheries Reports 36 (1995): 72 – 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi, R., J. J. Armesto, B. Goffinet, W. Buck, F. Massardo, J. Silander, M. T. Arroyo, S. Russell, C. B. Anderson, L. A. Cavieres, and J. B. Callicott. “Changing Lenses to Assess Biodiversity: Patterns of Species Richness in Sub-Antarctic Plants and Implications for Global Conservation.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6, no. 3 (2008): 131 – 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, Robert T. “Macroecology: Does It Ignore or Can It Encourage Further Ecological Syntheses Based on Spatially Local Experimental Manipulations?” American Naturalist 176, no. 4 (2010): 385 – 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. A., D. D. Ackerly, F. Adler, A. E. Arnold, C. Caceres, D. Doak, E. Post, P. J. Hudson, J. Maron, K. A. Mooney, M. Power, D. Schemske, J. Stachowicz, S. Strauss, M. G. Turner, E. Werner. “Filling Key Gaps in Population and Community Ecology.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 (2007): 145 – 52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, Daniel. “Community Ecology: Is It Time to Move On?” American Naturalist 163, no. 6 (2004): 787 – 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntire, E. J. B., and A. Fajardo. “Beyond Description: The Active and Effective Way to Infer Processes from Spatial Patterns.” Ecology 90, no. 1 (2009): 46 – 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L. S., P. R. Krausman, and M. L. Morrison. “The Habitat Concept and a Plea for Standard Terminology.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, no. 1 (1997): 173 – 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, and R. E. Schapire. “Maximum Entropy Modeling of Species Geographic Distributions.” Ecological Modelling 190, nos. 3 – 4 (2006): 231 – 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, D. R. B., and D. P. Peters. “The GARP Modelling System: Problems and Solutions to Automated Spatial Prediction.” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 13 (1999): 143 – 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirzel, A. H., J. Hausser, D. Chessel, and N. Perrin. “Ecological-Niche Factor Analysis: How to Compute Habitat-Suitability Maps without Absence Data?” Ecology 83, no. 7 (2002): 2027 – 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, J. A. Royle, K. P. Pollock, L. L. Bailey, and J. E. Hines. Ecological-Niche Factor Analysis: How to Compute Habitat-Suitability Map without Absence Data. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, N. Sutton, K. Kawanishi, and L. L. Bailey. “Improving Inferences in Population Studies of Rare Species That Are Detected Imperfectly.” Ecology 86, no. 5 (2005): 1101 – 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. G., E. Fleishman, D. S. Dobkin, and S. R. Hurteau. “Relationship between Avifaunal Occupancy and Riparian Vegetation in the Central Great Basin (Nevada, USA).” Restoration Ecology 17, no. 5 (2009): 722 – 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, Carol E. “Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science.” Philosophy of Science 69 (2002): 474 – 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobstein, Paul. “Revisiting Science in Culture: Science as Story Telling and Story Revising.” Journal of Research Practice 1, no. 1 (2005): Article M1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeck, John, and Edward F. Ricketts. Sea of Cortez: A Leisurely Journal of Travel and Research, with a Scientific Appendix Comprising Materials for a Source Book on the Marine Animals of the Panamic Faunal Province. Mamaroneck, NY: P. P. Appel, 1941, reprinted 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, David. “Competitive Interactions between Neotropical Pollinators and Africanized Honey Bees.” Science 201 (1978): 1030 – 32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, Robert. “Curve Fitting.” Science 202, no. 4370 (1978): 823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, Luis W., Walter Alvarez, Frank Asaro, and Helen V. Michel. “Extraterrestrial Cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinction — Experimental Results and Theoretical Interpretation.” Science 208 (1980): 4448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, Walter, and Frank Asaro. “An Extraterrestrial Impact.” Scientific American, October 1990, 78 – 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas, R. L. “The Anatomy of an Ecological Controversy — Honeybee Searching Behavior.” Oikos 69, no. 1 (1994): 158 – 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Thomas C. “The Perils of Paradigm Mentalities: Revisiting Kuhn, Lakatos, and Popper.” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (2010): 433 – 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, Steward T., Clive G. Jones, and Jurek Kolasa. Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier/ Academic Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W. “Abuse of Hypothesis Testing Statistics in Ecological Risk Assessment.” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2, no. 2 (1996): 331 – 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Judi E., Simon F. Thrush, Paul K Dayton, and Erik Bonsdorff. “The Effect of Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity on the Design and Analysis of Empirical Studies of Scale-Dependent Systems.” American Naturalist 169, no. 3 (2007): 398 – 408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman, D. W. “Evolutionary Rebound from Selective Harvesting.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23, no. 3 (2008): 117 – 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman, D. W., P. O’Donoghue, J. T. Jorgenson, J. T. Hogg, C. Strobeck, and M. Festa-Bianchet. “Undesirable Evolutionary Consequences of Trophy Hunting.” Nature 426, no. 6967 (2003): 655 – 58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, Edward F. “Essay on Non-Teleological Thinking.” In Breaking Through: Essays, Journals and Travelogues of Edward F. Ricketts, edited by Katharine A. Rodger, 119 – 33. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Janet, Peter Marsack, John Trueman, Brett Calcott, and Robert Heinsohn. “Story-Telling: An Essential Part of Science.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, no. 10 (2007): 510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bart, David. “Integrating Local Ecological Knowledge and Manipulative Experiments to Find the Causes of Environmental Change.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4, no. 10 (2006): 541 – 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, United States

    Rafe Sagarin (marine ecologist)

  2. University of Montana and North Carolina State University, United States

    Aníbal Pauchard (professor)

Authors
  1. Rafe Sagarin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aníbal Pauchard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Rafe Sagarin and Aníbal Pauchard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sagarin, R., Pauchard, A. (2012). Is Observation-Based Ecology Scientific?. In: Observation and Ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-230-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation