Skip to main content

Predicting the Hydrologic Response of Salt Marshes to Tidal Restoration

The Science and Practice of Hydraulic Modeling

  • Chapter
Tidal Marsh Restoration

Part of the book series: The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

The hydraulic gradients caused by tides are the primary source of physical energy in coastal salt marshes. The salt marsh ecosystem is driven by the interaction of tidal and freshwater hydrology, hydraulics, and sediment processes that determine water depth, duration of inundation, and amount of sediment erosion and deposition. The movement of water through tidal creeks and over marshes also establishes local water quality such as salinity, temperature, and dissolved oxygen as freshwater and saltwater mix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aubrey, D., and P. E. Speer. 1985. “A Study of Non-linear Tidal Propagation in Shallow Inlet/Estuarine Systems: Part I.” Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 21:185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkau, R. L. 2001. UNET, One-Dimensional Unsteady Flow Model, Users Manual. Davis, CA: US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., R. Enion, C. Morgan, and J. Westrum. 2006. “Oyster River Restoration, Old Saybrook, CT.” Unpublished student paper, Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Agency. 2008. “Understanding and Managing Morphological Changes in Estuaries, Great Britain.” The Estuary Guide. http://www.estuary-guide.net/pdfs /morphological_change_guide.pdf.

  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 1985. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBroom, J. G. 1992. “Pine Creek Tidal Hydraulic Study.” Pp. 1154–58 in Hydraulics Engineering: Saving a Threatened Resource—In Search of Solutions: Proceedings of the Hydraulic Engineering Sessions at Water Forum ’92, edited by M. Jennings and N. G. Bhowmik. New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milone and MacBroom Inc. 2002. West River Memorial Park Tidal Marsh and River Restoration, New Haven, Connecticut. Cheshire, CT: Milone and MacBroom Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrick, R., and L. Leopold. 1963. “Hydraulic Geometry of a Small Tidal Estuary.” Professional Paper 422-B. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, C. 1973. Guide to Bridge Hydraulics, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillip Williams and Associates, Ltd. (PWA). 1995. Design Guidelines for Tidal Channels in Coastal Wetlands. Prepared for US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. T., W. A. Niering, and R. S. Warren. 1984. “Salt Marsh Vegetation Changes in Response to Tidal Restriction.” Environmental Management 8:141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffranek, R. W. 1987. “Flow Model for Open Channel Reach or Network.” US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffranek, R. W., R. A. Baltzer, and D. E. Goldberg. 1981. “A Model for Simulation of Flow in Singular and Interconnected Channels.” US Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 7, Chapter C3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, D., and D. J. Yozzo. 1998. National Guidebook for Application of Hydrogeomorphic Assessment to Tidal Fringe Wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-16. Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1963. Tides and Tidal Drainage in the Northeastern States. Technical Release EWP-NO6. Upper Darby, PA: US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, J. M., and L. Weishar. 2005. “Ecological Engineering, Adaptive Management, and Restoration Management in Delaware Bay Salt Marsh Restoration. Ecological Engineering 25:304–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE). 1991. Tidal Hydraulics. Engineering Manual EM 1110-2-1607. Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division (NED). 1999. The Highway Methodology Workbook Supplement: Wetland Functions and Values (NAEEP-360-1-30a). Concord, MA: US Army Corps of Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., and P. Faber. 2004. Design Guidelines for Tidal Wetland Restoration in San Francisco Bay. Prepared for the Bay Institute, Funded by California State Coastal Conservancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. B., M. Orr, and N. Garrity. 2002. “Hydraulic Geometry: A Geomorphic Design Tool for Tidal Marsh Channel Evolution in Wetland Restoration Projects.” Restoration Ecology 10:577–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, M. L. 1999. “Salt Marsh Channel Morphometry: Application for Wetland Creation and Restoration.” Restoration Ecology 7:205–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, L. W., P. F. Lagasse, and B. L. Edge. 2004. Tidal Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Scour at Bridges. Publication no. FHWA-NHI-05-077. Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 25. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacBroom, J.G., Schiff, R. (2012). Predicting the Hydrologic Response of Salt Marshes to Tidal Restoration. In: Roman, C.T., Burdick, D.M. (eds) Tidal Marsh Restoration. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-229-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics