Skip to main content

Abstract

Although prerequisites involve the complex requests and information that the client gives to the designer, the urban design team needs to take additional steps to delve more deeply into the site and its context, parts, and components. This is the part of the process we define as knowledge. This stage is pivotal in the process. It is the time when designers investigate a site and its surroundings to understand the place that they will attempt to transform. Kevin Lynch states: “Every site, natural or man-made, is to some degree unique, a connected web of things and activities. That web imposes limitations and offers possibilities” (Lynch and Hack 1984, 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Institute of Architects. 2007. Architecture Graphic Standards. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Planning Association. 2006. Planning and Urban Design Standards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, Donald, Kevin Lynch, and John R. Myer. 1964. The View from the Road. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Edmund N. 1974. Design of Cities. Rev. ed. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Tridib, and Michael Southworth. 1990. “Kevin Lynch: His Life and Work.” In City Sense and City Design: Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch. Edited by Tridib Banerjee and Michael Southworth, 1-34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baradaran, Siamak. 2001. The Influence of Deterrence Function in Large Scale Accessibility Models: Baltic Sea Region as a Part of Europe, GIS-Analysis of the Transport Infrastructure and Accessibility. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baradaran, Siamak, and Farideh Ramjerdi. 2001. “Performance of Accessibility Measures in Europe.” Journal of Transportation and Statistics (September/December): 31-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevilacqua, Mario, ed. 2005. Nolli, Vasi, Piranesi, Immagine di Roma Antica e Moderna [Nolli, Vasi, Piranesi, Ancient and Modern Image of Rome]. Rome: Artemide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, Matthew. 2010. “Contemporary Public Space, Part Two: Classification.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (2): 157-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullingworth, Barry, and Vincent Nadin. 2006. Town and Country Planning in the UK. 14th ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastil, Raymond W., and Zoe Ryan. 2004. “Introduction.” In Open: New Design for Public Space, edited by Raymond W. Gastil and Zoe Ryan, 8-9. New York: Van Alen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, Jan. 1987. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. First published in 1971 as Livet mellem fusene. Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, Susan. 1992. Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Variations in Suburban Form and the Effects on Non-work Travel. PhD diss., Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, Susan L., and Debbie A. Niemeier. 1997. “Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives.” Environment and Planning A 29: 1175-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, Leonard J., ed. 2006. Landscape Architecture Graphic Standards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Jie-Eun, and Kimberlie Koile. 2005. “Heuristic Nolli Map: Representing the Public Domain in Urban Space.” Proceedings of CUPUM05 1 (July): 16. http://publications.csail.mit.edu/abstracts/abstractso5/hwang-koile/hwang-koile.html (accessed July 28, 2011).

  • Irace, Fulvio (a cura di). 2007. Renzo Piano. Le città visibili [Renzo Piano. The visible cities]. Milan, Italy: Triennale Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Roger A. 1983. Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines. Alexandria, VA: National Recreation and Park Association., ed. 1990. Recreation, Park, and Open Space Standards and Guidelines. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, Nicola Giuliano. 2004. Elementi della città e dell’urbanistica [Components of the city and urbanism]. Palermo, Italy: Palumbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Kevin, and Gary Hack. 1984. Site Planning. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malfroy, Sylvain. 2001. “Urban Morphology and Project Consulting: A Berlin Experience.” Urban Morphology 5 (2): 63-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Brian. 1994. Transparent Cities. New York: Sites Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, Ian L., and Frederick R. Steiner, eds. 1998. To Heal the Earth: Selected Writings of Ian L. McHarg. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, Phil, and Graham Haughton. 2006. “Planning with Ecological Footprints: A Sympathetic Critique of Theory and Practice.” Environment and Urbanization 18 (1): 113-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeda, Bally, Neil Parkyn, and David Stuart Walton. 2006. Graphics for Urban Design. London: Thomas Telford Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, Anne Vernez. 1997. “Urban Morphology as an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field.” Urban Morphology 1 (1): 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moughtin, Cliff, Rafael Cuesta, Christine Sarris, and Paola Signoretta. 2004. Urban Design: Method and Techniques. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Architectural Press/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, Lewis. 1938. The Culture of Cities. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndubisi, Foster. 2002. Ecological Planning: A Historical and Comparative Synthesis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeier, Debbie A. 1996. “Accessibility: An Evaluation Using Consumer Welfare.” Transportation 24 (4): 377-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North Ireland Planning Service. 2004. Open Space, Sport and Outdoor Recreation. http://www.planningni.gov.uk/index/policy/policy_publications/planning_statements/pps08.htm (accessed July 17, 2011).

  • Rydin, Yvonne. 2003. Urban and Environmental Planning in the UK. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, Ivor. 2004. “Introduction to the First English-Language Edition.” In Urban Forms. The Death and Life of the Urban Blocks, edited by Philippe Panerai, Jean Castex, Jean-Charles Depaule, and Ivor Samuels, vi-viii. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, Gerrit. 2009. Basic Urban Analysis. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Executive. 2003. Scottish Planning Policy Addendum to NPPG17 Transport andPlanningMaximum Parking Standards. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/03/16663/19411 (accessed July 17, 2011).

  • Smith, Mary S. 2005. Shared Parking. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrel, John. 2006. “Foreword.” In Sarah Gaventa, New Public Spaces, 7. London: Mitchell Beazley, Octopus Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirn, Anne Whiston. 1984. The Granite Garden: Urban Nature and Human Design. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. The Language of Landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Frederick, and Dean Almy. 2010. “Conservation as Catalyst: Lady Bird’s Urbanism.” Topos 71: 74-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Frederick, and Kent Butler, eds. 2007. Planning and Urban Design Standards (student edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, Carl. 2009. “Sketches from the Road.” Landscape Architecture 99 (6): 78-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trancik, Roger. 1986. Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treu, Maria Cristina (team leader). 1999. Piano Particolareggiato per l’Area di Fiera Catena a Mantova [Detailed plan for the Fiera Catena area in Mantova]. Milan, Italy: Department of Regional Science, Milan Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government. 2002a. Assessing Needs and Opportunities: A Companion Guide to PPG17. http://www.communities.gov.uk (accessed May 5, 2010).

  • Urban Task Force. 1999. Toward an Urban Renaissance. London: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veal, A. J. Tony. 2008. “Open Place Planning Standards in Australia: In Search of Origins.” School of Leisure, Sport and Tourism Working Paper 5. Lindfield, New South Wales: University of Technology, Sydney. http://www.business.uts.edu.au (accessed June 16, 2010).

  • Wall, Ed, and Tim Waterman. 2009. Basics Landscape Architecture: Urban Design. Lausanne, Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Paul F. 1985. “The Golden Fleece: The Search for Standards.” Leisure Studies 4 (2): 189-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo Palazzo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Danilo Palazzo and Frederick Steiner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palazzo, D., Steiner, F. (2011). Knowledge. In: Urban Ecological Design. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-226-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships