Advertisement

Climate Change, Extinction Risk, and Public Policy

  • Jonathan Mawdsley
  • Guy Midgley
  • Lee Hannah
Chapter

Abstract

When initial estimates of the extinction risk from climate change appeared, there was immediate public and media interest. Authors of Thomas et al. appeared on CNN, BBC, and other major national and international television networks. Newspaper headlines, often front page, appeared on the day of the report’s release. Magazine, radio, and other media treatments of the subject followed for weeks after. But to what extent was this media interest driven by policy relevance, and to what extent were the implications of the extinction risk estimates taken up in policy dialogue?

Keywords

Polar Bear Extinction Risk Public Policy Debate Incorporate Climate Change Government Decision Maker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). 2010. Accessed January 31, 2010. Available at http://www.cites.org
  2. Da Fonseca, G. A. B., W. Sechrest, and J. Ogelthorpe. 2005. “Managing the matrix."In Climate Change and Biodiversity, edited by T. E. LovejoyandL. Hannah, 346-358. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Endangered Species Act of the United States (ESA). 1973. Accessed January 31, 2010. http://www.fWs.gov/Endangered/pdfs/esaall.pdf
  4. Foden, W, G. Mace, J.-C. Vié, A. Angulo, S. Butchart, L. DeVantier, H. Dublin, A. Gutsche, S. Stuart, and E. Turak. 2008. “Species susceptibility to climate change impacts.” In The 2008 Review of The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, edited by J.-C. Vié, C. Hilton-Taylor, and S. N. Stuart. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  5. Goble, D. D., J. M. Scott, and F. W. Davis, eds. 2005. The Endangered Species Act at30: Volume 1: Renewing the ConservationPromise.Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hannah, L., G. Midgely, G. Hughs, and B. Bomhard. 2005. “The view from the Cape: Extinction risk, protected areas, and climate change.” BioScience 55 (3) : 231-242.Google Scholar
  7. Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 1999. “Coral bleaching, climate change and the future of the world’s coral reefs.” Marine and Freshwater Research 50: 839-866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 4 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2008. Species susceptibility to climate change impacts. Accessed January 31,2010. Available at http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/climate_change_and_species.pdf
  10. International Union for the Conservation of Nature-Species Survival Commission Polar Bear Specialist Group (IUCN-SSC PBSG). 2005. Summary of polar bear population status per 2005. Accessed January 31, 2010. Available at http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/status-table.html
  11. Lemieux, C., and D. Scott. 2005. “Climate change, biodiversity conservation and protected area planning in Canada.” The Canadian Geographer 49: 384-397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lovejoy, T. E. 2005. “Conservation with a changing climate.” In Climate Change and Biodiversity, edited by T. E. Lovejoy and L. Hannah, 325-328. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mawdsley, J. R., R. O’Malley, and D. Ojima. 2009. “A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation.” Conservation Biology 23 (5): 1080-1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Neill, B. C., and M. Oppenheimer, 2002. “Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol.” Science 296: 1971-1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruhl, J. L. 2007. “Climate change and the Endangered Species Act.” Accessed January 31, 2010. Available at http://works.bepress.com/j_b_ruhl/l/
  16. Scott, D., and C. Lemieux. 2005. “Climate change and protected area policy in Canada.”Forestry Chronicle 81: 696-703.Google Scholar
  17. Thomas, C. D., A. Cameron, R. E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L. J. Beaumont, Y. C. Collingham, B. F. N. Erasmus, et al. 2004. “Extinction risk from climate change.”Nature 427: 145-148.Google Scholar
  18. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1992. “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” Accessed April 18, 2010. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
  19. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2007. “Climate change: Impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in developing countries.” Accessed January 31,2010. Available at http ://unfccc.int/resource /docs/publications/impacts.pdfGoogle Scholar
  20. US Department of the Interior and US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOI and USFWS). 2008. “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of threatened status for the Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus) throughout its range” (Final Rule). Federal Register: May 15, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 95). Accessed January 31, 2010. Available at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2008_register&docid=fr15my08-18
  21. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. “2006 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation.” Accessed January 31, 2010. Available at http://library.fws.gov/pubs/nat_survey2006_final.pdf
  22. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. “Digest of Federal Resource Laws of Interest to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.” Accessed January 31, 2010. http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/treaty.html
  23. Zacharias, M. A., L. R. Gerber, and D. K. Hyrenbach. 2006. “Review of the southern ocean sanctuary: Marine protected areas in the context of the International Whaling Commission sanctuary programme.” Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 8: 1-12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Island Press 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Mawdsley
    • 1
  • Guy Midgley
    • 2
  • Lee Hannah
    • 3
  1. 1.The Heinz CenterWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.South African National Biodiversity InstitutePretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations