Abstract
The survey of the workshop participants described in Chapter 8 offered a broad overview of the multiple stakeholder perspectives regarding the management of the national forests in the Sierra Nevada region. Even among groups that seem superficially homogeneous, such as individuals who work for the Forest Service, we found a diversity of opinions about how best to manage the forests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Block, J. 1961. The Q-sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas (reprinted in 1978 by Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA).
Brown, S. R., W. Durning, and S. Selden. 1999. “Q-methodology.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration, edited by Gerald J. Miller and Marcia L. Whicker. New York: M. Dekker.
Delbeq, A., and A. Van de Ven. 1971. “A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning.” Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 7: 467–92.
Dryzek, J. S., and J. Berejikian. 1993. “Reconstructive Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 48–60.
Durning, D., and D. Edwards. 1992. “The Attitudes of Consolidation Elites: An Empirical Assessment of Their Views of City-County Mergers.” Southeastern Political Review 20: 355–83.
Fishbein, M. 1967. “A Behavior Theory Approach to the Between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward the Object.” In Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, edited by M. Fishbein, 389–99. New York: Wiley.
Green, P. E., and V. Srinivasan. 1978. “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook.” Journal of Consumer Research 5: 102–23.
Green, P. E. 1990. “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing 54 (4): 3–19.
Greenhalgh, L., and S. A. Neslin. 1981. “Conjoint Analysis of Negotiator Preferences.”Journal of Conflict Resolution 25 (2): 301–27.
Luce, R. D., and J. W. Tukey. 1964. “Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 (2): 1–27.
Martin, I. M., and T. A. Steelman. 2004. “Using Multiple Methods to Understand Agency Values and Objectives: Lessons from Public Lands Management.” Policy Sciences 37: 37–69.
McKeown, B., and D. Thomas. 1988. Q methodology. Newbury Park: Sage.
National Research Council. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
O’Reilly, C. A., J. A. Chatman, and D. F. Caldwell. 1991. “People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit.” Academy of Management Journal 34: 487–516.
Pill, J. 1971. “The Delphi Method: Substance, Context, a Critique and an Annotated Bibliography.” Socio-Economic Planning Science 5: 57–71.
Reddy, V. S., R. J. Bush, and R. Roudik. 1995. A Market-oriented Approach to Maximizing Product Benefits: Cases in U.S. Forest Product Industries. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Department of Forest Economics, Publication no. 4. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_reddy001.pdf.
Ryan, M., and S. Farrar. 2000. “Using Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Health Care.” British Medical Journal 320: 1530–33.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Shamir, M., and J. Shamir. 1995. “Competing Values in Public Opinion: A Conjoint Analysis.” Political Behavior 17 (1): 107–33.
Shocker, A. D., and V. Srinivasan. 1977. “A Consumer Based Methodology for the Identification of New Product Ideas.” Management Science 20: 921–37.
Stephenson, W. 1935. “Technique of Factor Analysis.” Nature 136: 297.
Stephenson, W. 1953. The Study of Behavior: Q-technique and Its Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stephenson, W. 1978. “Concourse Theory of Communication.” Communication 3: 21–40.
Theiss-Morse, E. 1993. “Conceptualizations of Good Citizenship and Political Participation.” Political Behavior 15 (4): 355–80.
Thompson, W. 1935. “On Complete Families of Correlation Coefficients and Their Tendency to Zero Tetrad-differences.” British Journal of Psychology 26: 63–92.
Zinkhan, F. C., T. P. Holmes, and D. E. Mercer. 1997. “Conjoint Analysis: A Preference-based Approach for the Accounting of Multiple Benefits in Southern Forest Management.” Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 21 (4): 180–86.
Steelman, T. A., and L. A. Maguire. 1999. “Understanding Participant Perspectives: Q-methodology in National Forest Management.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18: 361–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Island Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balint, P.J., Stewart, R.E., Desai, A., Walters, L.C. (2011). The Sierra Nevada Example: Elicitation and Analysis of Preferences. In: Wicked Environmental Problems. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-047-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-047-7_9
Publisher Name: Island Press, Washington, DC
Online ISBN: 978-1-61091-047-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)
